Hakann: Unity consciousness

Channel: A.S.

My dearest brothers and sisters,

This is Hakann speaking. I greet you in peace and love.

Let’s talk about individualism versus collectivism first. We’ll get to unity consciousness later in this message.

People who like individualism may argue that individualism equals freedom and that it has led to a free and prosperous West. They also point out that collectivism means that people’s rights and self-expression and individuality get trampled on, and that people get forced into a societal mold. They may say that collectivism means the Soviet Union and that it failed and that it wasn’t a good place to live in.

On the other hand, people who like collectivism may argue that everything goes to hell if people just individualistically do what they wish, as indeed the individualistic West has been declining of late. Furthermore, it’s lonely in a sense if everyone is just individually doing what they want.

So, what is better, individualism or collectivism?

Well, if half the population prefers one thing and the other half of the population prefers the other thing, then usually both are flawed in a way. If one of these concepts actually was simply correct, then it wouldn’t have become such a discussion.

Personally, us Pleiadians don’t really use the concepts of individualism versus collectivism. Instead we value unity consciousness and freedom.

So we have the freedom that on Earth comes from individualism, and the group harmony and group prosperity that on Earth comes from unity consciousness. Meanwhile we don’t have the oppression or stifling of expression that can come from collectivism, because we’re pro-freedom. And we don’t have the destructive selfishness that can come from individualism, because we have unity consciousness.

So: we wouldn’t dream of forcing someone to conform, or forcing someone to serve the state, in the way that Earth collectivist societies may do. Yet this works out because our unity consciousness means that people don’t do the evil, selfish things that happen in individualistic societies.

Of these two things, freedom should be self-explanatory. We have no taxes and barely any laws, and this works for us because we have a relatively high level of consciousness. And our society is good enough that people feel happy to volunteer and contribute.

What does unity consciousness really mean, though? Because it’s nice to call people “brother or sister”, or to say things like “we are all one”, but that’s just the surface level. What does it really mean?

Well, unity consciousness means that you perceive others as being part of yourself to at least a large extent. It doesn’t mean that you’re literally unable to distinguish you from others, but it does mean that for example if others are suffering you feel at least to an extent the same kind of motivation to help that you would feel if your shoulder was wounded. Now a unity consciousness person might not feel the urge to help others to quite the same extent as treating a physical wound on their own body, but it’s not that different either. To a unity consciousness person, ignoring the suffering of others just literally doesn’t make sense, in the same sense that ignoring a wound on your physical body wouldn’t make sense.

Now, many people will agree with this definition, but the problem is that to many people this is just a rational concept, and rationally understanding this isn’t yet unity consciousness. To achieve unity consciousness, you need to embody it. And from the definition it’s not immediately obvious how you could go about embodying this. Sure, a high consciousness person can just be, and automatically embody unity consciousness without effort. However, most people receiving this message aren’t yet in unity consciousness.

So I will suggest a way of behaving that can serve as one possible stepping stone towards unity consciousness.

One possible stepping stone towards unity consciousness is:

Who you are is first determined by your own reincarnating soul. So first, you should listen to your soul.

Who you are is second determined by you being an Earth human. So second, you should work to benefit Earth humans.

Who you are is third determined by your mind. So third, you should work to benefit yourself.

For example: most likely you are more spiritually advanced than the average person on Earth, because you are tuning in to these messages. Probably your soul, who you could see as the real you, nudged your mind and orchestrated events so that you woke up, at least partially. So who you are is first determined by your own reincarnating soul, which is why you’re most likely more spiritually advanced than the average person on your world.

Second, who you are is determined by the fact that you are an Earth human. After all, if you were born in one of the reptilian worlds where reptilians harm each other for their own benefit, most likely you would do the same thing too — except perhaps if your soul nudged you to be higher consciousness than the people around you. But if your soul didn’t nudge you one way or the other, it is quite unlikely that your mind would decide to start behaving in a very un-reptilian-like way.

And also, if you were born in a Pleiadian world, most likely you would be a reasonably typical Pleiadian, except perhaps if your soul strongly nudged you into a non-standard direction.

Most Pleiadians are Pleiadian-like, and most Arcturians are Arcturian-like, and most reptilians are reptilian-like, and most Earth humans are Earth-human-like.

So a being’s birth planet more strongly affects who they are than their own rational mind. You see few beings behave in a way that’s atypical for their planet purely because that’s what their mind decided, except if their soul nudged their mind in that direction.

So, who you are is determined first by your soul, second by you being an Earth human, and third determined by your mind.

Correspondingly, it only makes sense to first listen to your soul, to second try and benefit Earth humans as a whole, and third to try and benefit yourself.

What does that look like?

Well, first listen to either your soul, or your intuition which comes from your soul. (Don’t confuse emotions and unconscious beliefs with intuition.) Or if you’re unable to do either, listen to your guides or follow what resonates. Probably your soul will want you to dedicate a certain amount of time and energy to spiritual practice and self-healing; and a certain amount of time and energy to helping others or being kind to others; and a certain amount of time and energy to things that you find fun or that nourish you. And likely your soul will give you some guidance and advice here, without micromanaging everything in your life.

Second, for the time that your soul wants you to help others, go do whatever you think is most needed. Be the change you want to see in the world, even if it’s hard.

And third, for your personal time, just do what you find fun or what nourishes you. And remember that most likely your soul wants you to have a reasonable amount of fun time and relaxation et cetera. Most likely your soul doesn’t want you to spend every moment of the day volunteering to help humanity.

You can see how society would tremendously benefit if everyone would behave like this. Because after all, most Earth people are doing the third thing on the list most or even all of the time, where they just do what benefits them individually and perhaps a few loved ones. And most people aren’t listening to their soul and thus aren’t living an authentic life.

On the other hand, most Pleiadians understand that who they are was determined more by the fact that they were born in the Pleiades than by their own rational mind. Hence Pleiadians understand the importance of protecting, maintaining and further improving our society, because our society is so determinative to ourselves and to the other people in our society. We’re not under the illusion that it’s primarily our personal intelligence and ambition that is the reason why we are the way we are — instead we know that we are the way we are because we grew up in the Pleiades.

This is why our society works with no taxation and practically no laws. Because if people to an extent identify with their society and their group — if they have unity consciousness — then they are happy to do volunteer work and treat other people with kindness.

Some people might point out that average Earth humans already see themselves as an American, or a Christian, or a left-winger, et cetera. I wouldn’t quite categorize that as unity consciousness, because while those people may see some people as being part of themselves to an extent, they typically see other people as very much not being part of themselves. It’s not unity consciousness to include the people you like and exclude the people you don’t.

In fact, hating evil people isn’t unity consciousness. Sure, wanting evil people to be stopped is consistent with unity consciousness, but hating them is not.

So, we’re near the end of this message.

For the very few people who already embody unity consciousness, this message may not have been too useful. That said, most people don’t yet embody unity consciousness, and there’s a huge difference between rationally understanding the concept of unity consciousness and embodying it. This applies to many spiritual principles, by the way: rationally understanding them is useful, but you usually have to do significant amounts of spiritual practice to actually embody them, and embodying them is where the real gold is.

For the majority who doesn’t yet embody unity consciousness, I think this stepping stone can be a useful tool: basically listen to your soul first, work to benefit humanity second, and do what benefits yourself third. That said, keep in mind that your soul likely wants you to spend some amount of time having fun and nourishing yourself, so you don’t need to spend every waking moment doing volunteer work. In fact, if you’re in a tough situation, your soul might very well want you to put on your own air mask first.

Listening to your soul first and working to benefit humanity second is, I think, one possible good stepping stone towards unity consciousness. It is not the only possible path — doing a whole bunch of meditation is another path that can lead to embodied unity consciousness. But this is a possible path.

I respect you very much and you are in my thoughts, every single day.

With all my love,

Your star brother,
Hakann

If you are interested in local meetings with other people also seeking first contact with benevolent ETs, then please see https://eraoflight.com/2024/06/19/hakann-local-meetings-for-those-seeking-first-contact-with-benevolent-ets/ . If you search with control-F for @, then you can quickly find email addresses of those who are organizing local groups. It’s also not too late to post a new (secondary) email address yourself to start a new local group, because we plan to keep linking to that post for the foreseeable future.

For Era of Light

** Source

** These messages are exclusively submitted to Eraoflight.com by the channeler. If you wish to share them elsewhere, please include a link back to the original post

10 Replies to “Hakann: Unity consciousness”

  1. heleen meijerink

    Weer een prachtig artikel van Hakann en A.S. Van een grote kwaliteit hoor ! Lees al jaren lichtwerkartikelen. Werkt Hakann ook voor het Asthar Commando ? Domme vraag misschien. Maar dan lachen ze vast even.

    Reply
    1. the_complaint_department

      Ja. Zoek naar artikel “Hakann: Comparing Yourself to Others” van 25-11-2023

      (2023/11/25/hakann-comparing-yourself-to-others/)

      Reply
  2. Llevcon

    “if people to an extent identify with their society and their group — if they have unity consciousness — then they are happy to do volunteer work and treat other people with kindness”

    You literally just described the exact reason I DON’T do any of these things. Because even when I want to, people just don’t want to be helped by me. Therefore I don’t identify with anyone on this planet, because they ALSO don’t do those things. I’m tired, drained of my energy every single day by a bunch of zombies, and I want out. If I’m not gonna be able to help change this planet the way a Pleiadian would, then I want out and back home.

    Unless you want to prove me wrong. Show me I’m actually important SOMEHOW in this goddamn 5D liberation chess game.

    Your cue is tonight. Show me a sign, any clear sign, during my dreams. You know who I am. That’s your cue. Do your thing. I’m paying attention.

    Reply
    1. the_complaint_department

      Hold on, let me see if I got this right…

      You can’t identify or develop ‘unity consciousness’ with anyone on this planet; but you want to be proven WRONG by receiving a sign from people who are NOT from here?

      I empathize, but with that kind of logic it’s no wonder you’re tired.

      Reply
  3. John

    Very interesting. It fosters the notion that however unique, souls are neither entirely individual or collective.
    So while individual minds can and certainly do disagree, as do galactic societies; souls ultimately don’t conflict with each other, in spite of appearances.
    Therefore no matter how much individualistic and free one becomes, through their soul there can always be a connection to unified consciousness.

    Reply
  4. Aga

    Drogi Hakann, bardzo lubię Twoje przekazy, rezonują ze mną💜Pragnę z całego serca, by na Ziemi panowała taka harmonia jak w Plejadach💜Cieszę się, że myślisz o nas, a ja spoglądam w niebo i myślę o Was – Gwiezdnych braciach i siostrach💜Śnią mi się gwiazdy, piękne kolory na niebie i statki kosmiczne💜Greetings! 💜

    Reply
  5. LCX

    If defined broadly, collectivism can have several kinds, “individualism” and “libertarianism” can be interchanged depending on the situation. My following analysis is based on broad definitions.
    
    Regarding which is better, individualism or collectivism, my view is that if collectivism is based on true all-win or unity consciousness, then most people usually think that collectivism is better. But this does not mean that every society should be collectivist, but in an ecosystem composed of many societies, societies that tend to be collectivist are more common. Individualistic societies are wilder, and there are some people who really like it for various reasons, so it will not disappear.

    Historically, due to leadership defects and interference from dark forces, the Soviet Union basically did not establish democratic mechanisms in its early days, and basically did not even have democratic mechanisms based on collectivism. This to a certain extent led to the lack of democracy in its subsequent imitator countries. However, in theory, collectivism, as the name suggests, often requires democratic mechanisms to regulate its various plans, and collectivism based on all-win requires such feedback even more, and even in a broad democratic referendum, collectivism is often more likely to win because collectivism often produces very favorable effects for more than half of the people.

    Due to leadership defects and the lack of democratic regulation, the total amount of policy errors in the Soviet Union was particularly huge, and the Soviet Union was eventually ruled by a group of generally rather corrupt officials. Generally speaking, under the same supervision conditions, officials of collectivist governments are indeed more likely to be corrupt, because collectivist probably involves larger and more concentrated resources and human resources management, so collectivism requires stricter and more complex supervision and checks and balances mechanisms on officials. Of course, even if the additional democratic mechanism can keep the Soviet Union going, it’s still very imperfect and tight. It’s just that collectivism is not as bad in principle as some people think.

    Unity consciousness solves the problem from another angle. It is more collectivist, but it relies on more connections and more empathy, rather than complex rules of supervision and checks and balances to ensure the execution of many plans. The key purpose of these rules is to achieve things such as “using A to consistently outperform B+C” through clever design to ensure the stable maintenance and execution of plans. A = the majority of people are willing to maintain certain reasonable plans in most cases, B = the majority of people want to break these plans in a few cases, and C = the minority of people often want to break these plans, so it is not just as simple as the majority suppressing the minority, but also involves the majority managing themselves indirectly. In fact, the higher the level of consciousness such as unity consciousness and public morality, the simpler the rules required to maintain a collectivist society. Conversely, there is a limit, if the level of consciousness of a society is too low, the rule system will collapse anyway. Raising the level of consciousness is the ultimate direction of solution, but I think it often cannot be an immediately available solution on its own. It can be considered that each level of consciousness corresponds to a set of social rules, and it is often consciousness and rules that together constitute a set of immediately available solutions.

    Finally, at the general level of consciousness, although individualism saves a lot of trouble of dealing with complex rules, it is easier to fall into various internal offsets, repetitive creations, and Prisoner’s Dilemma. Moreover, with the intensification of monopoly and the gap between the rich and the poor, it will eventually form a system similar to monarchy or more acute slavery. But individualism can be improved. By adding more and more coordination rules and democratic checks and balances, it will maintain its moderateness for a longer time and become more and more like collectivism. There could be some relatively novel designs near the middle of this spectrum, such as the low-competitionism I described in the reply to the post “Hakann: Local Meetings for those Seeking First Contact with Benevolent ETs”, which includes a few relatively new enlightenments. Well, just to give an example.
    
    Thanks to A.S. and Pleiadian friends for co-creation.

    Reply

Comment