Soul Debate: Free Will, Responsibility, and Evil

By Raksha

I would like to open a discussion dedicated to some recurring exchanges that appear frequently on this site and in the comment section.

Free will, responsibility, and evil.

One participant recently mentioned the Epicurean paradox.

If God is omniscient, omnipotent, and benevolent, then there seems to be an inconsistency. Two of these attributes appear to exclude the third. A God who is omniscient and omnipotent cannot be benevolent. A God who is omniscient and benevolent cannot be omnipotent. A God who is omnipotent and benevolent cannot be omniscient.

The logic seems solid, but it implicitly assumes that God functions as a kind of tyrant. Free will, whether it is truly given, an illusion, or an extension of the Creator itself, introduces a fourth element that, in my view, resolves the apparent contradiction between the three previous attributes.

Many people on this site, especially in the comment section, regularly blame the “Galactics” for not intervening more directly or more quickly. This raises several questions:

What do they actually owe us?

What right do we have to demand their intervention?

Who is responsible for the current situation and for the level of suffering present on this planet?

Which groups have voluntarily participated in amplifying control and suffering?

And to what extent do other groups have the duty or responsibility to correct the situation?

What is humanity’s share of responsibility? Even if humanity has been heavily influenced, what portion of responsibility remains its own?

If the Galactics genuinely wish to help us, what criteria, contradictions, consequences, and potential side effects would be legitimate to consider before intervening?

What is the role of evil and suffering within creation?

Could the Infinite Creator be incompetent or imperfect? Could this all be the result of some cosmic mistake that requires correction? If so, why hasn’t the Creator — or its galactic aspects — already intervened in a decisive “Epic Fury” operation?

Or could it be that all of this has a meaning? That many other criteria, beyond simple comfort, are at play? Could it be that we are merely prisoners of malevolent puppet masters, abandoned to divine indifference or impotence?

These are the kinds of questions I believe deserve an open and thoughtful discussion.

Raksha

159 Replies to “Soul Debate: Free Will, Responsibility, and Evil”

  1. Ed

    There’s a lot
    To unpack here…
    Perhaps for me
    The big one while
    In The Mayonnaise
    ( malayze …., what’s uP)
    Just really wondering
    How much I could know
    Or find out
    You know … those innocent questions we ask ourselves
    While being called… during class
    Right before the bell rings
    My My Mr Eddie … are you still
    with us in class here …
    Today … or perhaps you’re
    traveling by
    your dragonfly …, again
    ( ring bell )
    Ok well
    Aaaahhh that’s all for today
    You starship troppers
    Class is dis smithed …

    I just want to know about
    The Rooms
    (The Tombs)
    Behind Your Mind
    Do I See A Vacuum There
    Or Am I Going Blind …
    You all know what I mean

    Really
    I just want to know everything

    YOU CANT
    HANDLE THE TRUTH

    LOTS OF TRUTH
    SENS8
    BLACK PANTHER
    TAKEN (Spielberg series “Dakota”)

    Here … on
    Era Of Light .. too
    Imagine the group think gestalt
    THE POWER OF EACH OF US
    COMBINED
    EVEN YOU < D’ LIL
    =ESPECIALLY YOUZ=
    QUANTUM
    COSMIC
    FEMININE GODDESS
    EMPERESS HIGH PRIESTESS
    OF ALL THAT IS
    GALAXIA
    NEATNESS
    JUST SAYIN’’””
    QRAYDIANT
    QKRYSTALLINE
    QDYAMOND
    QLOVEZ
    WELL I DI
    DO SURPRESS
    SPELLING
    OK …0k ok… Off the ceiling of my beauteous padd*ed room …

    We can surprise ourselves
    In to
    Who we truly are

    And
    Yes
    You
    All
    Are
    And
    Here
    Too

    And
    Be
    You
    Yes

    … what the bleep,,,do we know

    ===

    Reply
    1. Diamond Lil

      Ed, this is a fun one, it includes the entire chain gang!🤩

      I suppose we all have a room… rooms behind our eyes…

      I have rooms behind my eyes, too…
      some of these rooms DO have a vacuum in them, however….

      …it used to be a Hoover, but after spending so much time going within, I’ve upgraded to a Dyson!!! 😂🤪🤣

      Progress, right???

      😆😆😆 thanks for making that SO easy, Ed☺️😂😂

      👏👏👏🤭🤭🤭👏👏👏

      I think I’ll identify with Galaxia for a little while, Goddess archetype is a lot of work 🤪🤭🤪

      Signed ❌ Galaxia👑

      Heh 💎♥️🤓
      Yeah, I’m incorrigible, probably

      Hey Klaudia!👋
      I hope you’re not being serious today! 😂😂😂

      Reply
  2. Raksha

    Again, this one is excellent — it dates from long before COVID. You’ll need to enable auto-translation, though it’s not very good.

    France consistently ranks, by a wide margin, as the country that trusts its government and media the least in international polls. At the same time, it also tends to rank near the bottom in surveys measuring self-reported happiness.

    Maybe there’s a connection.

    Reply
  3. Raksha

    This one is great, please turn the auto-subtitles in english. It was from the second Iraq war, but still as stingy and accurate as ever (that channel was offed a few years ago by a french billionaire) :

    Reply
  4. Ed

    Man 0 Man
    THE T*C*D

    The relevance of suddenly engaging in a subjective view tends to go amiss on Raksha, and the same is valid for objective views on Klaudia’s end. Unless I’m wrong and projecting all of this myself, you’re both projecting, which is kinda fun to watch from my pretense ‘outside’.

    THAT WOW
    WORKING IT BAYBE
    WORK IT

    Thought you had it done

    Leaving it to “u bastards”

    Gog dog night
    E L vis a vis
    Has left the building

    Stage Right

    ALL IS RIGHT
    IN THE WORLD

    THATS
    Y
    IT
    LEFT

    Reply
  5. Diamond Lil

    Very enjoyable article and conversations, Raksha!

    Excellent commentary, not a single irrelevant reply 🤩

    I’m not able to add to the comment stream beyond this…however…
    my intellect 🤭😭😂…
    isn’t designed for philosophical, intellectual, thoughts😎

    I sure have enjoyed reading all of it anyhow, that’s for sure 😁

    ♥️💎

    Reply
    1. Ed

      I’m not able to add to the comment stream beyond this…however…
      my intellect 🤭😭😂…
      isn’t designed for philosophical, intellectual, thoughts😎

      And your presence
      QRAYDIANT
      QKRYSTALLINE
      QDYAMOND
      QLOVEYZ

      Suggestz
      You
      Are
      You
      Yes…

      ALL
      THE
      ABOVE
      ALL
      THE
      BELOW
      THIS IS ALL
      QLOVE
      QYOU
      QYES
      😘💎💓
      Q R K D Lil
      💛
      Tooz

      Reply
  6. LCX

    I hope to offer only a brief explanation, and the following is an understanding based on various information:
    
    The galactics can be divided into white, gray, and black, and in the context of the information from A.S., the term ‘galactics’ basically refers to the white galactics.
    
    The current human body is largely designed by the gray and black galactics. Those people who possess the bodies designed by the white galactics have higher heights, longer lifespans, larger pineal glands, and so on. They used to live in places like Lemuria and Atlantis, now they live underground, and we only have their diluted bloodline.
    
    The current human civilization, especially our matrix, is mainly designed and manipulated by the gray and black galactics, and to some extent, manipulated in the opposite direction by the white galactics. Finally, it is largely agreed or acquiesced by humans, and consciously or unconsciously executed by humans. After all, this is the era of isolation, and no galactics can openly operate. Of course, the era of isolation is coming to an end.

    As the solar system enters the photon belt, the white galactics are strengthening their effect on Earth, retaking and helping to repair the Earth itself from the gray and black galactics, and adjusting the Earth civilization theater to transform more gray and black souls, reduce excessive pain, and completing the experiments of ascension and evolution.
    
    Of course, the white galactics are not perfect, they may make some mistakes in their work, but they don’t seek pleasure or profit from our losses, they tend to quickly compensate for our losses, so now they can hardly have owed us something.
    
    In terms of background morality, the gray especially the black galactics owe us an awful lot, because they are actively accumulating that, our losses are equivalent to their wealth. I think the problems on Earth are mainly caused by them.

    But the ordinary people who have not awaked, and the junior awaked suffer the most, and the necessity for them to eliminate their pain seems cannot to be measured by moral responsibility, just like a person on fire analyzing how much responsibility they have to put out the fire seems meaningless. If measured by intention responsibility, due to their lack of understanding of goals and expectations, the responsibility of the unawaked is smaller than that of the awaked.
    
    Actually, I don’t care much about who has how much moral responsibility, I care more about who wants to do what, and what I can do.

    Reply
    1. the_complaint_department

      Since you don’t care much: believing darks and grays ‘morally owe us an awful lot’ is part of the reason souls stay stuck.
      Even moral debt is an illusion, part of the program which keeps people tied here.
      Remember whose face is in the coin? Works both ways, don’t let the world owe you anything.

      Reply
  7. Gwydyon

    I don’t agree how Cobra’s statemetents are represented here.
    He lately said „the most important thing to do right now is to connect with your higher self“. That is to empower ourselves.

    Then, he never claimed to give an ultimate framework or ontology about the whole creation. He says he is the spokesperson of the resistance movement and spreads the information he received and is authorized to share. And sometimes he has obviously human emotions and is a bit frustrated.

    I personally don’t find a primary anomaly a technical term leading to victimhood. It’s an explanation for the existence of evil in the form we experience it.

    About free will in the context of astrological constellations of February 17th 2026 he wrote:
    „All this combined will activate human free will to the next degree never before possible.“
    That is quite the opposite of „free will doesn’t play a role anymore, it’s only up to the ET forces now“.

    Reply
    1. Nixael

      „the most important thing to do right now is to connect with your higher self“

      This resonates with me.
      I felt this way yesterday and wrote the following comment below.

      “I think that in times of chaos it is better to look inward for stability rather than engage in external debates or disputes.”

      Reply
    2. the_complaint_department

      Yes, but “explaining evil in the form we experience it” presents a logical trojan horse that can easily turn into evil by itself.

      You have bottled an abstract concept, like the Church selling indulgence and tickets to heaven for rich people in the not-so-long-ago ages.

      Lev has done the same thing in certain articles by implying karma can be transferred to humans souls by force.

      It’s not that these constructs aren’t real and valid, but overlooking the danger that your readers will turn them into excuses for their own faults as they have done over and over is irresponsible.

      Neither of them seems to have their boots on the ground dealing with people who want to buy and sell cures instead of doing inner work.

      Reply
      1. Gwydyon

        I’m really torn about Lev. I value pin-point critic like about this Karma concept. What is collective karma? Somehow deeds of others have consequences for yourself even if you didn’t personally participate. Isn’t that a transfer of karma?

        In my perception Cobra often criticized exactly the attitude of commenters that now here are criticized. There are people doing the worst stuff “in the name of Jesus”. Is he to be blamed for it? Fools gonna fool.

        Then, people use “the world is bad (evil), so I have to be bad too” as excuse. Too present a scientific explanation why we have this form of evil in the universe changes nothing for people who seek excuses – they found excuses before and will always find them.

        Reply
        1. the_complaint_department

          I find that the concept of karma works only in (and precisely because of ) the absence of any fair external judgement mechanism of our actions. Simple natural laws that do not require enforcement to exist.

          I’m glad to argue about how these laws work and eventually don’t seem to work on the surface, but believing a free soul from source can be bound into slavery and misery through a contract is a karma by itself IMO, and not one I’m interested in following through.

          Reply
        2. Viktor

          The law of karma is the same as the law of action and reaction in physics. It can likely be partially circumvented or its effects slowed down, and this is precisely what the Dark Forces of the universe have learned, having perpetrated evil without issue for billions of years.

          Reply
  8. Gwydyon

    I don’t agree how Cobra’s statemetents are represented here.
    He lately said „the most important thing to do right now is to connect with your higher self“. That is to empower ourselves.

    Then, he never claimed to give an ultimate framework or ontology about the whole creation. He says he is the spokesperson of the resistance movement and spreads the information he received and is authorized to share. And sometimes he has obviously human emotions and is a bit frustrated.

    I personally don’t find a primary anomaly a technical term leading to victimhood. It’s an explanation for the existence of evil in the form we experience it.

    About free will in the context of astrological constellations of February 17th 2026 he wrote:
    „All this combined will activate human free will to the next degree never before possible.“
    https://2012portal.blogspot.com/2026/01/situation-update.html
    That is quite the opposite of „free will doesn’t play a role anymore, it’s only up to the ET forces now“.

    Reply
    1. the_complaint_department

      Since this comment only became visible recently and it was posted 3 minutes before the duplicate, I assume changing that small detail in the first sentence was enough to bypass the algorithm.
      It was absolutely free of profanity, and yet required a meaningless change of words to get through. Impressive.

      Reply
        1. the_complaint_department

          Ah, sure! I mean, probably- I don’t know, but it makes more sense… my bad missing that.

          Reply
  9. Nixael

    But the storm has passed, it’s good to see the sun again after the storm 🌞
    What catches the eye again are the two ends of the same stick. Galactics also engage in such debates, and opinions are contradictory. Hence, we have what is called a stalemate in chess. That’s why Ashtar said that there is no one brave enough on Earth or beyond Earth to overturn the table and say, “Let it happen on my responsibility.”

    Reply
    1. Viktor

      “Brave Lucifer” already flipped the table once, and we still can’t get the table back upright.

      Reply
      1. Nixael

        He didn’t overturn the table, he just repainted the pieces and started cheating. Overturning the table is a symbol of the end of cheating.

        Reply
        1. Viktor

          The forces of light cannot “turn the tables” without an order from “above.” Because they are obedient children of the Source. Therefore, the very phrase “Let it happen on my responsibility” implies going against the will of the Source and bearing punishment (responsibility). Going against the will of the Source means becoming like the dark forces, who do whatever they want because they don’t care about responsibility for their actions. Do you understand? There’s nothing courageous about this; otherwise, one could say that obedient children of the Source are cowards, and disobedient children of the Source are courageous. This is simply advertising for the dark forces and humiliating the forces of light.

          Reply
  10. Ed

    Well
    You’re already alright
    Mighty Mitez
    Yeah

    “Up From The Skies”

    I just want to talk to you
    I won’t uh, do you no harm
    I just want to know about your different lives
    On this here people farm
    I heard some of you got your families
    Living in cages, tall and cold
    And some just stay there and, dust away
    Past the age of old

    Is this true?
    Please let me talk to you

    I just want to know about
    The rooms behind your minds
    Do I see a vacuum there
    Or am I going blind?
    Or is it just uh, remains from vibrations
    And echoes long ago
    Things like “Love the World”
    And uh, “Let your fancy Flow”

    Is this true?
    Please let me talk to you
    Let me talk to you

    I have lived here before, the days of ice
    And of course this is why I’m so concerned
    And I come back to find the stars misplaced
    And the smell of a world that has burned
    A smell of the world that has burned

    Yeah well, maybe
    Maybe it’s just a change of climate
    I can dig it
    I can dig it baby, I just want to see

    So where do I purchase my ticket?
    I would just like to have a ringside seat
    I want to know about the new Mother Earth
    I want to hear and see everything
    I want to hear and see everything
    I want to hear and see everything

    Aw, shucks
    If my daddy could see me now
    Everything, everything
    Everything, everything

    ===
    Just had to
    😘💎💓
    Youz
    💛

    Reply
  11. Ed

    This is really golden

    You’re Not Human Anymore! Everyone Can Feel The Shift Happening Inside You
    2K views · 13 hours ago…more

    Quantum Nexus
    93

    Thank You ALL
    QUANTUM
    LOVE

    Reply
  12. Ed

    THE SHA RAKZ

    Quiet
    Diplomatic
    Desperation
    Is The English Way

    THE SONG IS OVER
    TURN OUT THE LIGHTS
    I THOUGHT
    I HAD
    SOMETHING
    MORE
    TO SAY ..
    Toosh Shay

    Mr
    Mojo
    Rising
    Voodoo ChilE
    Voodoo ChilD

    Reply
  13. Klaudia

    I just wrote a really clear comment, with some highlights that even surprised me😍. But then “it was already done” –

    💎✨️✨️✨️✨️🪄✨️✨️✨️💎✨️✨️✨️💎✨️✨️✨️💎✨️✨️✨️✨️🪄✨️✨️✨️✨️💎!

    – what my words had summed up, and all that remained was this essence:

    “WELL WELL DONE RAKSHA❣️” and all others of course❣️, who completed his mission with their energy.

    Reply
  14. Ed

    Ok
    Wow
    You’re here
    SHOCK THE MONKEY

    Raksha
    03/21/2026 at 8:46 PM
    So, when I ask for clarity, you add even more “”””” and **** and blame the Iphone or whatever ? You cheeky 😉
    Cheeky Bum

    TO LIFE
    The problem truly for me… is
    Basis
    Thats it
    Simply
    BASIS

    TRUTH BECOMES THE LIE THAT MUST BE TRUE
    WALTER CRONKITE
    IT MUST BE TRUE
    THE ONLY WAY TO MAKE IT BELIEVABLE TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC
    IS TO PUT IT ON
    TELEVISION
    AND TELL THEM ITS TRUE
    Nixon?

    Raksha
    03/21/2026 at 8:46 PM
    So, when I ask for clarity, you add even more “”””” and **** and blame the Iphone or whatever ? You cheeky 😉
    Well this is a big part of the
    Q U E S T I O N
    I
    ON
    EYE
    ON
    THREE
    EYE
    ATLAS
    THIRD EYE AT LAST
    WE MEET
    ST PETER
    A.A.GABRIEL
    QUEST

    I like to find sumpThang
    And sTick To iT

    Quantum
    Unique
    Entanglement
    Singularity
    Transcending

    So we go “across the universe”
    Sending energy vibrations frequencies across all matters of matter
    They don’t get lost
    They get stored storied etc
    HyperSpacially
    As potential..
    “here,there,and everywhere “
    BEATLES MEME
    ROLLONG STONES MEME
    BLACK JESUITS
    WHITE JESUITS
    DIPOLE
    BIPOLE
    TRIPARTITE
    “SUPERS READY”
    … he even put in …
    = New Jerusalem =
    PROJECT GENISIS
    “The crystal ships are being built a thousand trills a thousand girls?”
    THE TOPANGA CANYON PROJECT
    This is stuff… readily available
    Really for me…
    I listen to Jimi … and Jimi asks
    “I want to know about the new mother earth … I want to hear and see everything “…
    AXIS BOLD AS LOVE
    My father’s initials ABL
    A B A L
    A D A M
    Just ask THE AXIS
    Jordan Maxwell… hanging out with him in the day
    “Once you see it, you’ll always know”
    It’s a pattern
    It’s a template
    The usurpers do not create
    THEY ARE USURPERS
    END OF STORY
    WE CREATE
    AND CO-CREATE
    AS CO-CREATORS
    SOURCE CODE
    THEY ATTEMPT TO STEAL
    SOURCE CODE
    THEY HAVE NO WAY
    TO UTILIZE
    TO FUNCTION
    TO REPLACE
    THAT WHICH
    THEY ARE NOT
    THESE ARE THOSE
    WHO SEEK
    TO PASS
    BEYOND THE POINT
    OF WHICH
    THERE IS NO PASSING
    THUS FAR
    AND NO FARTHER
    NOW
    BE GONE

    TRUST ALL IS WELL
    SO IT IS
    AND
    SO IT WILL BE

    INDEED
    BELOVEING ONEZ
    INDEED

    Ok ok… hehehe .. one more

    “SPOCK”…
    …”speck(pee wee Herman)”

    Speculation
    Who just got shot…
    “KIRK”… star trek meme

    … Dr R … 33 minutes and counting
    Q18

    Reply
    1. Ed

      It could be
      SPOOCK

      The world keeps turning
      I hope it don’t turn away
      I need a crowd of people
      To help me get through the day

      Hey hey my my
      Rock and roll must never die
      There’s more to the picture
      Than meets the eye…

      Roll
      Cameras
      Roll
      Chimeras
      SEE
      B
      S

      … what’s ever next … Will be that
      Whatever is
      So how’s abouts
      We turn all around
      Do the Hokey Pokey
      Gumby
      Dance
      JOKERZ ARE WILD

      QUANTUM
      MAGNIFICENCE
      AWARENESS
      BALANCE
      EXPERIENCE

      THATS IT
      DR SIR SHA THE RAH

      BEHOLD
      EMBRACE
      MERGE
      EMERGE

      BE
      THE ONE
      YOU
      CHOOSE
      TO BE

      Unique
      Special
      Equal

      MAY
      YOU
      USE
      WISELY
      MY FRIEND
      MY
      AWARENESS
      RAYDIANT
      (amazing what 1 letter r our does)

      10:07

      Q

      Reply
  15. Raksha

    I learned a lot from that debate.

    First, I realized that what I wanted to say was actually much more straightforward than I initially thought.

    Second, I noticed that I tend to paraphrase Ra a bit too much. I’m not a fanatic, but often I want to express an idea and then realize that Ra has already said it better than I could. At the same time, that can make my way of speaking feel a bit too academic, so I’ve learned that I should moderate my references.

    Third, I learned that Ed is not some kind of UFO after all, but actually capable of reading, understanding, and even responding in ways that I sometimes struggle to fully grasp — yet am still able to partially grasp at times. It still requires some effort on my part, and I’m still a bit puzzled as to why Ed doesn’t communicate more plainly — but I’ve come to see that he’s definitely not a bot, and not just talking nonsense.

    Fourth, I realized that the main point I was trying to address with that original post — the invitation to debate — became clearer through the responses (in a Klaudia-like way). Many of those who seemed the most frustrated or caught in a sense of victimhood were either aligned with Cobra’s framework or simply going through genuine personal pain (and here, I am extending my analysis beyond that single topic).

    I also noticed that some people are truly hurting, and that’s not something to judge. But instead of simply acknowledging that pain — saying, “I’m struggling right now” — there can be a tendency to wrap it in a metaphysical explanation, to justify it or reshape it, rather than facing it directly.

    Fifth, it’s not exactly a realization, but I could once again observe how the mind can become contradictory — how one standard can suddenly shift when applied to “others.”

    Sixth, again, not exactly a revelation, but I’m reminded of how the “spiritual community” often seems divided between those who emphasize “love and light” — and I don’t mean that in a derogatory way — and who tend to avoid confrontation, and those who are willing to engage in debate without feeling like they’re betraying their spirituality. The latter can sometimes come across as a bit sharp or blunt — myself included. It almost feels like a dynamic balance between feminine and masculine energies.

    Seventh, also nothing new, but the difficulty of language itself. Even when we try to be precise, a slight miswording can trigger long responses that end up missing the original point entirely, and therefore invite even more back-and-forth. I’m not blaming anyone here — we are operating under the veil, and the lack of telepathic communication is, quite frankly, a real limitation.

    Eighth, in the same vein, there’s the issue of references. We all come from different sources, frameworks, and models, yet we use the same words. Most of the time, we assume we’re talking about the same thing, when in reality, nothing could be further from the truth.

    To illustrate — and this goes far beyond this particular debate — it’s something you can observe almost everywhere: someone introduces a metaphysical concept from a specific background or framework, and another person responds from an entirely different one. Very quickly, there is no real debate anymore.

    And that’s normal.

    This is precisely why I think it’s important to reference our sources, acknowledge our biases, and regularly define our terms — simply to make sure we are actually talking about the same thing.

    I’m not a stickler for semantics, but I do see the value in establishing common ground first. The real debate can only begin once that foundation is in place.

    The most frequent cases tend to involve topics that are, if I may say so, a bit beyond our depth. It’s not unusual for us to debate complex metaphysical ideas. One person will say, “According to Ashtar, this or that is the case,” while another replies, “According to Cobra, that’s not true,” and so on (again, I am not basing that analysis on this topic alone).

    Even that is already a step forward when people clearly state their sources or biases. But most of the time, they don’t. Instead, claims are made without context — “because of the reptilians…” or “the Pleiadians said…” — without any explanation of the underlying framework or reasoning. Wait — can we pause for a moment and simply explain where we’re coming from?

    In that kind of setting, how can we truly engage in meaningful exchange?

    If the goal is not to share but simply to vent, then that’s fine — but it’s better to be honest about it. And I am not judging here. We are human. We all, at times, try to rationalize. Rationalization is a legitimate mechanism. I’m simply saying that it would help us — as a collective — to engage in healthier dialogue if we acknowledged that more openly.

    Reply
    1. Raksha

      OMG, it went through! KJ, did you change anything? Because one thing I’ve never quite figured out is how ED manages to post such long messages so freely — and how your filters actually work haha 🙂

      Reply
      1. Ed

        Now you know why I sound behave converse like a bot

        Rarely… stuff goes through
        “Lucky “ … today
        Better place
        My bet
        On The Human Race

        We are not playing on
        a level playing field
        just and yet… place a bet …
        Do not suggest against
        The QUEST
        Continues…

        Sir R… between my thumbs
        this new 26.3 thing… held out since 14.7 as long as I could get away with it
        This screen bounces as I text
        And really feeling the exchange of ideas … is vital
        Even the number of comments
        Epic

        Very gracious of you and Kejraj
        to in
        Join us

        Stand up join the chorus Sing sing
        Joie de vivre

        What else is there to do be say

        😘💎💓
        Youz
        Tooz
        💛

        Reply
          1. Ed

            Well
            Just sayin

            iPhone ops
            Too

            If dementia serves
            Isn’t this how it got started

            Even the waiting for my “”” likes a “””” lot ••• must as I must “”””
            Some thing like that …
            Was it dinner the cigarette the dessert the dry dry desert
            That really got me hurt …
            Aaaahhhh
            Those Galaxygirlz …

            Battle Scars Galaxia …

            Not to mention this program creates its own wordings etc
            Way beyond my slow thumbs
            Gotta check everything twice then more middle mistakes… expecting the post comments to go through
            And then what open 5 of the same web page to see if one will go through yes yes really creatively combative is it is mate

            I really can sound soy boy this like I do
            RAKSHA
            UNITES
            THE GALAXY
            !!!…???… now what…

          2. Raksha

            So, when I ask for clarity, you add even more “”””” and **** and blame the Iphone or whatever ? You cheeky 😉

        1. Raksha

          And just for the record, my masculine appendage is neither 26 nor 14… well, I suppose that depends on your measurement methodology.

          Sorry — I think I needed to balance all that soul-level expression with a touch of vulgarity. 😄

          Reply
          1. Ed

            Yeah
            That’s truly
            A “LOOP”
            MEME

            JUST LIKE
            “ MINI-ME”
            “MEME”
            Austin Powers…

            Don’t push me cause I’m
            Close to the
            Edge
            I’m trying not to loose my head …
            Makes me sometimes
            Wonder how I keep
            From going
            Under …

            The Revolution Will Not Be
            Televised
            The Revolution
            Will Be
            Alive

            … well perhaps a pause
            Is as wise
            As a blind
            Cow
            Amongst
            The Elephant

    2. the_complaint_department

      Well I feel like I’ve just been dragged through saloon bar fight scene, but there’s no better way to spend a Saturday when the Internet works.
      Happy equinox, see you lovely bastards next week.

      Reply
  16. Ed

    There’s a recurring idea often associated with darker influences: “I didn’t force you — I only suggested it. It’s not my fault.” (I’m not saying you are one of them; I’m pointing to the deeper question of what free will truly means.)

    In the end, the response is always ours.

    Going on deeper .. really than my previous preferences…

    Home of the brave
    Land of the free…

    My friend
    John Carter musician
    Hymn To Freedom
    His recordings move in ways that are so deep

    And really there it is …
    Being a child
    Growing up
    The environment affects / effects
    Perspective
    What changes perspective
    Given inaccurate data
    As TRUE
    TRUST TRUTH
    PURELY
    Just my defining moment
    And as we “grow “… it’s the
    Same QUEST
    Questioning The Quest
    Based upon those that
    Do not
    Notice
    NOT
    ICE

    THATS NOT REALLY
    PLAYING VERY
    NICE

    BUT THATS THE ASSUMPTION
    THERE IS NO TRUTH
    HERE
    AS THOSE WHO
    PROFESS TO KNOW

    YOU CANT HANDLE THE TRUTH
    BROOKINGS INSTITUTE
    Or a movie
    Or TAVISTOCK
    JASON BOURNE
    BASIC INSTINCT
    EYES WIDE SHUT
    DINNER WITH ANDRE
    ENEMY OF THE STATE
    SHOOTER
    MATRIX
    BLACKLIST
    PERSON OF INTEREST
    LUCIFER
    EQUALIZER
    LORD OF THE RINGS

    The balance will come
    Chaos is unrecognized order
    To be alive… truly
    The Ultimate Weapon
    Even “love” was weaponized
    Here… or on the other side

    THERE ARE THOSE
    WHO SEE
    WHO HEAR
    WHO FEEL
    WHO KNOW
    WHO ARE

    JUST IMAGINE
    NO
    THING
    GOES IN
    NO
    THING
    GOES OUT
    THEY
    ARE
    AND
    BE
    AWARENESS
    COMPLETE

    AND
    BREATHE
    A
    BREATH
    THAT
    CLEARS
    ABSOLUTELY
    BEAUTY
    COMPLETELY

    Yes…
    You will know
    Yes they are here

    Thank You ALL
    QUANTUM LOVE

    Reply
    1. Raksha

      If I understood you correctly, what I shared reflects a higher-level perspective, which I believe is valid. That said, it does not negate the apparent unfairness of certain situations, nor does it diminish the need for love, compassion, and at times simply offering a helping hand.

      Reply
      1. Ed

        Truly
        Yes
        Thank You Raksha
        With all of my presence
        This is how we all came to be here

        Perhaps this will load now
        Sometimes these things do funny things… L o L

        Love
        Out
        Louder

        Brilliant post & share

        John Carter ‎– Hymn To Freedom
        415 views · 6 years ago…more

        Interstellar Space
        630

        QUANTUM LOVE

        Reply
        1. Raksha

          Another difficulty with language — and perhaps one reason why you and Klaudia chose to bypass it — is that implying one perspective can seem to invalidate others that appear contradictory. This is something we, as rational thinkers, have to deal with constantly.

          To be more precise: I do believe in the Starseed concept, and I see the fact that beings from higher densities would come here — into this complex and often chaotic environment — losing both memory and natural abilities, as a testament that the Universe does care. It suggests that compassion is present everywhere, and that the suffering of third density is indeed profound.

          That suffering can be both deeply real and, at the same time, without a clear culprit. That is my point.

          There may be no true culprit — not in an absolute sense — yet the experience of sorrow, even as an illusion, is as real as it can be. And the Universe is not indifferent to it.

          But perhaps the Universe seeks to alleviate that suffering not by saving the child from the outside, but by awakening the Creator within.

          Reply
          1. Ed

            Yes
            My take too
            Simply put
            Some of us went
            Rogue …
            The New Kid On The
            Block Has New Rules
            So… like any “venture capitalist “
            Why not game the system
            We rig it for us …
            Who will ever know…
            Of course sub… jective by nature
            VERY BIG TOPIC
            ONE SUPERCYCLE = 34 zeros
            14,5k SUPERCYCLES OUT NOW
            What about
            MALDEK
            “LEV” … Quantum Transition
            Cobra… compromised (by his own admission years ago)
            New Age Spirituality… hacked
            “THEY” … know how to reach us read us … cause they set up the bleechers… the leechers
            So rereading… some of my postings are clues to the key
            They are not set up designated designed to know a “KEY”…
            Not In The Mark Up
            SIMPLE
            SO AS WE
            CONTINUE VIA
            AWARENESS
            MANY OF US … will stumble into quantum
            However that comes in
            IT WILL
            COME IN
            IT IS AVAILABLE
            TESLA
            AETHER
            3 6 9…etc
            ALL HERE
            ALL AVAILABLE
            ALL NOW

            OK … what now
            N O T I C E
            Your heart is not ice
            Very simple and complex
            By THEIR DEFINITIONS
            THEY CREATE THE SPELL
            SPELLINGS
            R A Y N B O W
            ACCURATE
            FAERIE
            ACCURATE
            DRAGON
            ACCURATE
            ARCHANGELICS
            ACCURATE
            CHOHANS
            ACCURATE
            Di Vine = The Line
            ACCURATE
            SO
            ON AND ON
            Looking through the lens of the heart ,,, very interesting fascinating developments
            VIA
            HEART CORE SOURCE CODE
            WHO FUNCTIONS
            WHO GLOWS
            WHO FLOWS

        2. Diamond Lil

          Okay, I’m picking this comment.

          With well over 100 comments to sift through, finding one , but not one in the middle of a conversation,
          hasn’t been easy!

          Now I’m remembering why I couldn’t comment to ya last night, I ran out of energy to handpick just the right comment 🔦🔍🕵️‍♀️

          Ed,
          🌞in the light of day,
          I was like, “Nah, I find the one I saw earlier
          🔦🔍😭

          🌃🌚🌘

          🌞Now that it’s today, I’m don’t really remember what I was going to say for certain comments of yours …

          🎲🎲🎲 I’ll roll ’em, and see what happens .

          Hey Yo! (da)

          Goody two shooz 🩰

          🤔🤔🤔
          Oh, I had thought you were a bot, too!

          But when you said you were a musician, it all made sense.
          Musicians think in repeating, numerical, and rhyming, thoughts.
          Snap!

          Therefore, your comments roll out like songs, whether they are songs, or not 🎸

          😁♥️💎

          I think I remembered most everything.

          Reply
  17. Shapeshifter

    Thanks to everyone who answered me. Now we can all clearly see who has a bit of reason in their minds, and who remains a completely lobotomized paper weight. Heh. My job here is done.

    Best of luck to those who choose to remain in the darkness of their own ignorance. You’re gonna need it.

    Reply
      1. Shapeshifter

        You’re telling me. I didn’t say names. If it resonates it’s not my fault ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

        Reply
          1. Raksha

            Now, can you imagine a higher-density being — with greater knowledge, more advanced technology, and expanded capabilities — saying the same thing?

            Perhaps that sheds light on the contradiction you were pointing to, about why God didn’t “press the red button.” It may not be about failure or neglect, it was just “not their fault”. From that perspective, they simply offered a greeting — and the rest remains a matter of response and choice.

          2. Raksha

            Actually, I’m grateful for your comment — it gave me the opportunity to express what I had been trying to say all along, in a more distilled way.

            There’s a recurring idea often associated with darker influences: “I didn’t force you — I only suggested it. It’s not my fault.” (I’m not saying you are one of them; I’m pointing to the deeper question of what free will truly means.)

            In the end, the response is always ours.

            A situation in which one being could unilaterally force another, in an absolute sense, may not truly exist — at least not at the level of the soul. That may be why “God” appears so hands-off.

            In that sense, you’re right: it’s not about fault. There is no fault. There are “greetings,” or catalysts — interactions through which beings relate, explore, and experiment. But no one can ultimately be coerced without some form of consent at a deeper level.

            From that perspective, everything is, in a way, as it should be. There may be no need to “purge evil,” only to understand our relationship to it. It’s not ‘their fault” if we fall into certain patterns or traps — it’s about awareness and response.

            Anyway, I’ve said quite a lot today. I took responsibility for opening this discussion, and now I’ll let it settle for the day. I’ve learned a number of things, and overall, this has been a positive experience for me.

    1. the_complaint_department

      For the record, lobotomized paper weights hold the papers on my desk far better than the unlobotomized ones.

      Reply
    2. Anutara

      Shapeshifter. You’ve accomplished your task. Well done. However, some people need to experience the corresponding victimhood themselves to learn from it. That’s their free will.

      Reply
      1. Shapeshifter

        Nothing wrong with that. My job isn’t to cure other people’s darkness, but rather act as its mirror. A shadow worker. As Lucifer was.

        To assimilate your own shadow, you have to:

        1) Grasp it (domain of the lower energies)
        2) Expose it (domain of the physical plane)
        3) Bring it to the light (domain of the higher energies)

        “Light and love” can’t grasp darkness on its own because it’s too subtle of a frequency. Ask any reptilian in the Galactic Confederation (or Emerelda) why they still struggle with their shadows. Most likely out of denial, ignorance, avoidance, clinging to unrealistic ideals/headspaces, etc.. In other words, they can’t grasp it. As above, so below.

        You need denser intermediaries. Some Earth religions (e.g. umbanda) understand that concept quite well. Think of it like literally a suplex move. How do you do a suplex (grab, lift, bonk) if you can’t even physically touch your opponent?

        The answer is the simplest of all laws – attraction. To attract the dark, be it.

        Enter me.

        Or anyone else with the right amount of discernment and understanding of the process. But I chose to be it, because not only I believe in the process, it actually works.

        As it just did. Somehow, at least one person in this entire thread came to an epiphany or gnosis of sorts. That puts us one step closer to actual liberation. That’s all I care about. The rest is up to them.

        Reply
        1. Klaudia

          Light and love” can’t grasp darkness on its own:

          I can only confirm this, because I was only light and love until the process began for me. “The concept of darkness” had to explain everything to me in minute detail… during the first two years… and in a very easily understandable and sometimes playful way. Logic was always present, ensuring that all the new aspects that arose daily from every direction were neatly connected. Micro = macro constantly reflected back and forth, explaining to me the truly embarrassing chaos in my life that had brought me to this point of breakthrough.

          “Because its too subtle of a frequency”:

          I don’t know if “frequency” is the right word, or if it should be “weak” instead of “subtle”, but in practice, this is how it works for me:

          This “darkness” represents many things, including “excessive masculinity”, because it simply doesn’t know and consequently doesn’t understand “the emotional world of only light and love”. Therefore, my process has used me in the worst possible way (“_harvested_ me,” you could even say 😏) to construct something that is designed so that every man (but also every woman who is no longer properly connected to her light and love identity) will be able to (read: forced to) readjust. Almost automatically. Just like everything always happens “automatically” for me, including writing this comment.

          “SHAPESHIFTER❣️” my heart leaped a little with joy when it saw your name here.

          Reply
          1. Raksha

            What about excessive Feminine energy Klaudia ? Could you really believe that only the YANG has its flaws ?

          2. Klaudia

            That is a good question Raksha, and I’m feeling like “EXPECT ITS ANSWER!”.

          3. Klaudia

            Btw: This isn’t the first time I’ve had the impression you’re projecting an aspect of yourself (that I’d rather not describe) onto me. But it’s yours, my dear.☮️

          4. Raksha

            I would have loved to actually pursue the convo but I am afraid I don’t understand what you are implying in your last two messages, so I will just keep it at that.

          5. Shapeshifter

            @Klaudia You could switch “frequency” for “energy”, perhaps that’s a better word for it. I tend to interchange both words as I see them nearly as the same thing, but that’s a me thing.

            Agree with the rest of your comment. There’s a reason yin and yang are a thing, except it got flipped at creation. Feminine energy is often depicted as “light” (magnetism, or Yin) in this context, and masculine energy is often depicted as “dark” (electricity, or Yang).

            Whoever flipped the meaning when inventing the symbol is the real occult enemy. Just like it happened with the swastika. Eastern people refuse to validate the inversion done by you-know-who and preserve its original meaning to this day: a vortex of LIFE. Not the icon of a totalitarian regime.

            If some people out there did the exact same “un-flipping” in their beliefs, maybe they would better understand the current situation instead of preaching to a physically ineffective method. (Also maybe a lot of “bigots who call others bigots” would stop forcing their ideologies down our throats, because they would realize they themselves are the problem).

            Behind every “love and light” there is a “hate and dark”. Behind every forced smile there is a traumatized individual. The first step is to recognize it. The second step is to absorb it.

          6. the_complaint_department

            Good morning! Allow me: Raksha did NOT understand that when Klaudia said “(…)this is how it works for ME:” at the end of the paragraph; she was only talking about herself and NOT giving a personal generic view about ‘Yang having flaws’.

            The relevance of suddenly engaging in a subjective view tends to go amiss on Raksha, and the same is valid for objective views on Klaudia’s end. Unless I’m wrong and projecting all of this myself, you’re both projecting, which is kinda fun to watch from my pretense ‘outside’.

          7. Raksha

            Haha. Thanks for trying. We all are projecting constantly, this is only natural. I fail to see the value of saying so to someone face though, even moreso when no explanation is given.

            I remember a convo between you and Klaudia not long ago, where I found the same sensation of watching a double projection going on. It was fun.

          8. Ed

            Yes
            LADY K
            YOU KNOW YOU KNOW
            Many of us …
            Notice

            The representative presence
            The “disrupter “… “usurper”
            MODEL
            THIS IS KEY
            ITS A KEY
            SOOOO
            How what where why
            That’s not very nice
            For me … that’s the differential
            Truly is “A DIFFERENT MODEL “
            Humanity has become like a car lot … so what’s the price you ask …

            Jumping ahead
            QUANTUM LEAPZ

            QUANTUM
            MAGNIFICENCE
            AWARENESS
            BALANCE
            EXPERIENCE

            … ice
            … or
            ,,, not ,,, ice

            Looking in the in between
            That’s the difference
            YOU KNOW YOU KNOW
            YOU YES
            YOU ARE LOVE

            OBVIOUS TO ALL
            HERE

            S0000 … what’s that thing next to you
            Certainly not you
            This is how we all get entrained to be
            And be
            Con
            Fused

            The ultimate confidence game …

            Loving All
            The Brilliance
            You are
            Yes…

            😘🌈🐉

          9. Ed

            When the Alchemist enters your mind’s eye during a reading, he radiates a sense of curiosity and potential transformation. He is an inspiring figure who has mastered the art of turning something ordinary into something extraordinary. As he stares into the philosopher’s stone with an inviting smile, you are propelled into his extraordinary world, overflowing with the numerous potions and elixirs that lay scattered on his ancient laboratory table.
            Rest assured that if you have seen the Alchemist in your reading, he brings signs of positive, transformative energy. Integrating the spirit of transformation, the Alchemist shows the power of transmutation within your grasp. Whether it’s turning a difficult situation into a learning experience or transforming life’s dull moments into meaningful lessons, the Alchemist’s presence beckons you to recognize the power of personal growth.
            This card also suggests you are in for an exchange of intellect, passion, and perhaps a pinch of sorcery. A chemistry-filled interaction with someone who shares your love for science and mystery is likely on the horizon. Now is the time to be open to those inspired conversations which, like a powerful potion, could inspire tremendous growth.
            The Alchemist, in his ancient laboratory, is surrounded by all manner of potions and elements. Much like the Alchemist himself, each element begins as a raw ingredient but has the potential to become something greater. Drawing this card suggests you are like these elements, full of untapped potential, waiting to be transformed into something else.

            The Spirit of Inquiry and Discovery

            The Alchemist is encouraging you to acknowledge and master your inner ‘alchemy’, your own transformative process. Change is a powerful force in the universe and within your life. You have the ability to morph lackluster situations into golden opportunities. Ask yourself, how can you turn struggles into stepping stones? What silver linings are hidden in complex situations? How might you be able to create a positive shift in your life?
            But it’s not all about transformation. This card also speaks to the spirit of inquiry and discovery. The Alchemist’s love of science and the mystery of transformation speaks to the value in pursuing journeys of understanding and discovery. With his guidance, you are encouraged to dive deeper into your interests and passions, enjoy the thirst for knowledge, and turn by some happy accident, into golden moments of enlightenment.

            What The Alchemist Means for You Today

            Today the Alchemist has appeared to prepare you for a significant transformation, or to remind you of the potential transformations within your reach. Remember, transformation doesn’t mean a total overhaul, it could just as well mean small yet impactful positive changes or discovering a new way to understand an old problem. The alchemist also brings good tidings about an intriguing, chemistry-filled rendezvous with a kindred spirit. Be open to the unexpected, be bold in your quest for knowledge, and be prepared to unlock the door to your personal alchemy.

            LADY K
            KNOWS
            SHE KNOWS

            HEY “ DEXTER”
            What they get it…
            “Well, they will blow up my
            Labore rite tory…
            What shall I do
            NOT TELL
            DE DE

            MOOOOMMMMMM
            DE DE IS IN MY ROOM
            SHES GOING TO BLOW
            IT UP

            DE DE … now play nice
            With your little brother

            HEY ARNOLD
            WHATS THAT
            PINKY AND BRAIN
            DOING ON
            OUR BLOCK

            BETTER TELL YOUR
            GRANDPA

            JOHNNY QUEST

            … well you live in the picture …

          10. the_complaint_department

            Well that depends on how you value whatever is being projected, but simply acknowledging projections almost invariably kills all the drama that may exist in your relationships.

            Not everyone enjoys such prospect, but it’s quite pleasant on a spiritual level.

          11. Raksha

            Good thing I don’t enjoy drama much, then. But still, there is a way to reflect excessive projection to someone with diplomacy and caring, that way is not to bluntly tell them “huh, you are projecting dude”. As Jung said, the projecting uncounscious really dislike to be caugh in the act. There are far more productive and honest ways to share that.

          12. the_complaint_department

            OK… I’ll take that as a hint that you do not wish to hear the undiplomatic version then!

            The building has left Elvis.

        2. Viktor

          //Shapeshifter
          03/22/2026 at 4:00 PM
          @Klaudia You could switch “frequency” for “energy,” perhaps that’s a better word for it.// – Energy is constantly in motion, vibrating at a specific frequency. These are not different things, they are one process.

          Reply
      2. Raksha

        I am not sure I understand your point, I am genuinely asking : Do you imply that people need to suffer to learn the lesson that victimhood is real ?

        Reply
  18. Ed

    Lyra
    03/21/2026 at 2:52 AM
    I wanted to add: Thank you for your thought-provoking post, Raksha.

    Yes
    Truly
    Epic numberz
    Here

    Thank You ALL
    QUANTUM LOVE

    Reply
  19. Ed

    And
    Well…
    Perhaps this will be
    Of some assistance
    Perhaps…

    Heart Brain Coherence Is Your Quantum Frequency
    12K views · 2 months ago…more

    Quantum Spirituality Lab
    6.24K

    ===
    And a revision
    Re vis it …
    From
    “The Thoth Land”

    TRUST ALL IS WELL
    SO IT IS
    AND
    SO IT WILL BE

    Change how you look at something and that something changes

    Even Wayne Dyer… made $ on that
    Call now
    One 800
    Collective
    Call now
    We’ll see

    Chicken Soup Of The Soul
    Ya gotta laugh people
    People …
    Pleasing People
    Are The Happiest
    People
    In The World

    Rayn Drops
    Keep Falling
    In My Head…

    I Used To Live
    In A Room
    Full Of Mirrors
    All I Could See
    Was Me…

    Anyone
    Anyone
    Anyone

    😘💎💓
    Golden
    Yes
    You
    Are
    💛

    Reply
  20. Shapeshifter

    For A.S. (reply button didn’t show up anymore in the thread, welp):

    > why aren’t the Arcturians willing to take that [0.1% chance] risk?

    I would argue the Galactics suffer from the same problem we do on Earth – they “operate under a democracy”. Except here we usually follow the “50% + 1” metric, they probably go with the more radical “if *one* person out of billions disagrees we won’t do it”. I would appreciate if they at least came clear about that.

    Agree with the rest of your comments. I don’t mean to sound like a jackass, I’m just tired of watching the death of “questioning everything”. It’s the only way I can contribute to anything anymore now. Hopefully the seed has been planted and people will start to realize how deep the rabbit hole goes, and how you should never take rhetorics for granted, no matter if they fap your ego or not (“just being” is not a sensible answer to a dense war-ridden physical plane like this one).

    Reply
    1. A.S.

      I agree that questioning everything is important, and as I said, I am open to the idea that they’re a bit too careful.

      “(“just being” is not a sensible answer to a dense war-ridden physical plane like this one).”

      Disagree. The only criticism I have of the “just be” advice is that some people need a more expanded, specific version of that statement.

      Reply
      1. Shapeshifter

        Perhaps. Details are important. You wouldn’t say “just be” to a civil casualty in Iran who lost a leg and is smothered by debris for example. But yeah, I think this is it from my end.

        Reply
  21. Jiva

    AS, I wasn’t being literal when I said “infinitely superior”. Bad choice of words. A lame attempt to be humble.

    Thank you

    Reply
  22. Viktor

    There is a cosmic hierarchy/structure. The Ashtar Command and the Galactic Federation fleets around Earth must wait for a signal from more spiritually evolved beings (for example, the councils of the Great Central Sun or even the Source itself) to do anything significant on Earth. In fact, in extreme cases, the free will of unawakened people on Earth can even be ignored, just as an adult ignores a child’s desire to continue playing in a sandbox and pulls them out of the sandbox so the child can go to school.

    Reply
    1. Shapeshifter

      The top of the hierarchy (“Source”/”God”/etc.) has already given the order: “Earth must be liberated”. This was 1-2 years ago. We’re still waiting.

      One (or more) of the nodes in the hierarchy either didn’t receive the order (or didn’t propagate it), or is actively refusing to follow the order. So we’re dealing with either raw insubordination, or a mind-boggingly case of seriously deaf ears (or minds).

      Reply
          1. Raksha

            I think one thing we can all agree on is that this is a special time, and that Earth and its inhabitants have, in a sense, bought a ticket to a major unfolding.

            The details — and especially the timing — seem to depend largely on one’s perspective. As for me, I choose caution, patience, and a certain de-dramatization, even though I’ve had my share of disillusionment and disappointment along the way.

      1. Viktor

        Not quite so. We must base ourselves on the actual state of affairs. What do we see? The hapactic fleet has not opened to the world, and the world still has not ascended to a higher density. What does this mean? It means the time has not yet come. Look, the galaxies are not responsible for the quantum transition; they are only the support. Beings of a higher level, very close to the Source, are responsible for the quantum transition. And since there is no quantum transition, it means there was no directive from above for immediate action. Also, the galactic fleet must officially reveal itself to the world around the time of the quantum transition. The fleet has not opened to the world—that means it is too early. One depends on the other, you understand?

        Of course, you can start getting angry and thinking that betrayal, deception, and incompetence are all around. But what will this give you? Hopelessness? Loss of faith in the Source? This is counterproductive. That’s why the messages simply say, to reassure people, “Trust the Plan.” So calm down, everything will be fine and in due time. And worrying won’t help the process, and therefore you.

        Reply
      2. the_complaint_department

        If you believe in a hierarchy, then obey your superiors.

        If that is Pleadians, you wait.

        If that is Source, you liberate earth.

        No problem.

        Reply
        1. A.S.

          Reminds me of the story where some Turkic sultan put his 12 year old son in charge and retired to a life of philosophy and religion.

          Then Christians started massing their armies, believing this was a great opportunity to attack.

          That 12 year old sultan asked his father to come back. The father refused, and the 12 year old sultan then wrote to him: “If you are the Sultan, come and lead your armies. If I am the Sultan, I hereby order you to come and lead my armies.”

          The father returned, took command of the army and beat the Christians.

          Reply
      3. A.S.

        I believe that Source said “Earth must be liberated soon”, and that if the galactics liberate us six months from now, that’s still in compliance with what Source decreed.

        Reply
  23. Ed

    The Grand Mothers eyed me up and down and said, “We want to give you something. Something useful, something beautiful and something fun! We want to give you new eyes.

    “You aren’t yet seeing things the way they really are,” they explained. There’s still some distortion, and that makes your vision not as clear as it could be. It’s still a bit cloudy and limited,” the Grand Mothers said, “but we have the cure for that. Until you grow fully into your own Divine Vision, we will let you see outward through our eyes.

    “Simply call us and ask us to come in. Let us take up residence inside you and look outward from you. This won’t take any effort on your part. It will be easy. Simply ask us to see through your eyes. We’ll do the looking and that way we can show you all the amazing colors and patterns out there. All the subtleties. We’ll show you the way that light and love permeate the world. We’ll show you the real shape of things.

    “Everything will look different to you, we promise. It’ll no longer be obscured, not limited or distorted in any way. You see,” they said, giving me a look of understanding, “you’ve had blinders on for so long that you don’t know how beautiful, how brilliant the world really is! Let us show you!” they said. “Just ask us to come inside so we can take a look, and we will.

    “Ask US to look outward at your loved ones. Ask us to look out at your ‘problems.’ Ask US to look at you. Ask US to observe the world news. Ask us!” They cried “We’ll do all of that and more. We’re happy to do it.

    “There is nothing in this world that frightens us,” they said. “Nothing that offends or hurts us because we see all of it as it actually is. We see you as you are. We look outward and we see potential. Love in action. Light and beauty being born and coming into being.

    “So call us in right now and ask us to have a look. We can have some fun together.”

    QUANTUM
    LOOKINGGLASS
    PROJECT

    QUANTUM LEAPZ
    QUANTUM LOVEZ
    QUANTUM LASTZ

    QUANTUM
    VISION

    😘💎💓
    Here
    Tooz
    Golden
    💛

    Reply
  24. Jiva

    Raksha, I agree with your last comment except I do believe that “The Plan” comes from a single unified source at the top
    and the rest do their best to go along with it.

    Also I mean no disrespect. They are infinitely superior to us but we are working together and they should at least listen to us.

    Sometimes I read a higher message and I think to myself: are they looking at the right planet?

    As I sit here and look at the the morning light coming through my window I can see that everything is already different but the snoozers don’t see it.

    They need stronger evidence. That’s what I’m asking for.

    May be I should just ask for patience.

    Reply
    1. A.S.

      “They are infinitely superior to us”

      Pleiadians don’t believe they’re infinitely superior to Earth humans.

      Frankly, if I was a Pleiadian, I’d be hesitant to go meet another human who thought I was infinitely superior to them.

      Reply
  25. Raksha

    On a side note, this is something I’ve been meaning to share for a while. We often use expressions like “Ashtar said this” or “Ashtar said that.” But in reality, many different people are channeling Ashtar, and I believe that any channeling involves the receiver just as much as the source.

    We all have our own biases and natural resonance with certain spiritual material over others. That’s why I think it’s important to avoid the trap of speaking as if there were a single, unified version of “the Plan,” one definitive “Ashtar,” or one homogeneous group of “Galactics.”

    When quoting a channeled source, it seems more accurate — and more honest — to include the name of the channeler as part of the reference.

    Reply
    1. Shapeshifter

      So you’re pretty much low-key confirming that every channeler is by default biased, therefore unreliable. Thus, there is no “single source of truth” when it comes to Galactics. Which further implies they’re either lying to us or omitting important intel we should have known by now, all due to “the enemy mustn’t know”. And then they redirect the blame to us, the ground crew, by gaslighting us with “love and light” and telling us to “have discernment” (in the middle of a WAR) and do things that amount to nothing in the physical plane (where the real battle is happening).

      Pretty dickish if you ask me. I’d rather have my wallet robbed by a prostitute, it’ll feel way less traitorous.

      Reply
      1. Raksha

        I’m saying that every source of information is relative — except, perhaps, the one we can access within ourselves, if we are open enough.

        I’m not implying that channelings have no value. Rather, I’m suggesting that they are, to some extent, inherently distorted — and therefore serve as a valuable tool for discernment.

        This, in my view, follows from the first Law.

        The danger is to ascribe absolute truth to an external messenger.

        Reply
        1. A.S.

          If you want to know the absolute truth, don’t read a channeled message. Instead sit under a tree and breathe.

          Reply
          1. A.S.

            I once considered sending in a message that just said “Be” and that was the entire message.

          2. Raksha

            RA once joked, we only have one basic thing to say, but since you would quickly grew bored with it, we are trying to reiterate the same thing over and over with different words and complexities.

        2. Shapeshifter

          I find that to be “giving the benefit of the doubt to a bunch of con artists”. It’s way easier to just be honest, like it already (allegedly) is in so-said “Pleiadian society”. This isn’t a school exam for us to spend unnecessary energy with “discerning” (or “attributing absolute truth” either like you said).

          Why does nobody question the “light and love” rhetoric? Why do those who do are cast aside? This isn’t “light and love”, it’s spiritual bullying.

          Reply
          1. Raksha

            RA explain that the truth must be offered without proof. If truth was to be offered with proof, what was the point to come under the veil of forgetting to begin with ? Of course, this is just another perspective.

      2. Viktor

        There’s no 100% reliable medium. All information comes through the prism of their subconscious. When Ashtar was asked why this was, he said, “God/Source allowed us this particular method of communicating with earthlings.” The information in the messages is so sparse in specifics because, according to Ashtar, “Where can we find an earthling who is both highly spiritual and a highly intelligent scientist?” And they can only communicate with people of sufficiently high spirituality. Therefore, there are few specifics, plus the subconscious distorts the information. Some messages stated that this was intentionally done by God/Source as a lesson to teach people to “separate the wheat from the chaff.”

        Reply
      3. Anutara

        Shapeshifter. You’ve accomplished your task. Well done. However, some people need to experience the corresponding victimhood themselves to learn from it. That’s their free will.

        Reply
      4. A.S.

        I’m a channeler and I think all channelers are biased and not 100% reliable — including myself.

        Obviously I think I’m mostly reliable and accurate, otherwise I wouldn’t publish my channelings, but I’m not 100% reliable / accurate.

        Reply
    2. Viktor

      //When quoting a channeled source, it seems more accurate—and more honest—to include the name of the channeler as part of the reference.// – if this is a stone in my garden, I indicated the Medial Peace Circle in Berlin 1955-1965.

      Reply
        1. Viktor

          More precisely, it was called Medialer Friedenskreis Berlin. It was headed by Herbert Viktor Speer. His daughters served as contactees/channelers.

          Reply
  26. Jiva

    I just don’t like their plan. I disagree with it. It’s one sided.

    This could be fun. But it ain’t. They say we are “boots on the ground” but they talk to us like we are chihuahuas. (“Dear ones “and all that)

    Boots on the ground need help on the ground. Back us up. Treat us like the lions you want us to be.

    I would love to be concerned with only the Spiritual all the time but there is a material mess down here that needs to be cleaned up first.

    We will clean it up from a spiritual standpoint but we need some material help.

    Seems only fair.

    Let’s work together – as Lions!

    Reply
  27. Ed

    Cobra

    Got it bad

    Usurping Usurpers
    The saga continues

    We
    Have
    This

    Focus
    Flow
    Function

    The Perspective
    Is Everything
    For
    Everyone
    Zero Point
    Tripartite
    Look And See

    We can do be are
    HERE

    AND

    EVERY
    WHERE
    ANY
    THING
    ONE
    MATTER
    BODY
    SOUL
    MIND
    PERSONA
    BEING
    IS

    Even you
    Who “ever”…
    Existing Existence
    Exist Exists

    IN
    TRANCE
    NO
    TRANCE

    AWESOMENESS
    AWARENESS

    WHO CAN RESIST

    SIT
    REST
    TRANSCEND

    … just playing here …
    Watch
    What The Bleep … Do We Know

    Truly
    RAMTHA
    “ is an old friend of mine “

    Yours … too
    When we look
    Inside
    The Black In The Eye
    Of A Dead Ant …

    EXHALT
    YOU
    YES

    Reply
  28. Viktor

    Here’s what Ashtar said between 1955 and 1965 (Mediate Peace Circle in Berlin):

    //Question: It is assumed that the leaders of this humanity are inspired, so that they are somehow guided by GOD. On similar grounds, it is also believed that dark and evil deeds occur by GOD’s will. Is it true that GOD allows this?

    Answer: It is true that people, while present with their souls in matter, are subject to inspiration. Inspiration is telepathy. Inspiration comes not from the planner, but from souls in the spiritual realm. GOD, THE PLANNER, has no influence whatsoever on the leaders of humanity. In this regard, each person has their own free will. They have the ability to do good or evil, as long as people do not interfere. GOD does not hinder people in their actions. But negatively inclined people, if they end up in government, can easily be inspired in a negative way by otherworldly spirits. They are puppets of evil entities because they are inclined toward evil. This is especially true for those with selfish aspirations.

    Question: If the GREAT PLANNER (GOD) is so powerful and benevolent, then no absurdities should arise in nature. But recently, Siamese twins had to be separated. How is this understood?

    Answer: The PLANNER has a counter-planner, who constantly interferes in matters that aren’t his. This is the source of absurdities in nature. But GOD also takes this experience into account for future use. Added to this are the mutations that arise during new attempts. Such mutations are also often quite risky for the PLANNER. But this risk is necessary, because without it, progress is impossible. But life can also become obsolete. Obsolete life forms must be replaced by new ones. Everything is constantly in flux, as humans also experience new laws. You speak of the whims of nature. This is an incorrect expression. Nature does not allow itself whims. There are phases of development that sometimes lead to failure. Great risks can require sacrifice. The PLANNER also constantly learns from all these experiences. Perfection in the Universe is far from achieved. The PLANNER is also constantly evolving. He grows in His Greatness. Therefore, the church’s belief that GOD has always been great and does not change is a misconception.

    Question: If accidents occur during life, we cannot understand why a soul, without any fault, is incarnated as a monster. Perhaps GOD should not have allowed this? This is cruel and unjust. No wonder atheists have lost their faith. A very convincing explanation is needed here.

    Answer: If the CREATOR, whom we call the PLANNER, created the Law of Life, then this Law will inevitably operate. Such a law is based on millions of experiments. It’s not as simple as the Bible says: “GOD spoke and it was so.” Hundreds of thousands of years can pass before even the slightest change in divine law occurs.

    According to GOD’S law, every human or animal body must receive a soul if it is viable. A deformed being can be viable, even if only for a short time. According to divine law, incarnation must follow. Therefore, every viable deformed being can become a vessel for a soul, regardless of how the soul copes with this vessel. This has nothing to do with the cruelty of the PLANNER, nor with HIS will, because HIS will is always directed toward progress, even if sometimes something goes wrong.

    Question: Thus, we have learned that there are things that happen but are not planned by GOD. This changes the persona of GOD, because we imagined HIM differently. So, in many things, GOD is not omnipotent. This is true.

    Answer: The PLANNER also takes failures into account, from which HE learns and which HE tries to prevent. This is the scope of HIS activity. But HE does not concern himself with things that are outside HIS jurisdiction.

    Question: Then we should not be surprised that such brutal wars occur. We must also reconcile ourselves to the fact that some politician, like Ulbricht, can exercise his tyranny without a higher power interfering with it. Are we completely left to our own devices?

    Answer: We are all creations of the PLANNER. Naturally, HE is interested in our well-being. But HE never intervenes personally. HE has assistants. HE gives the task, and others carry it out. HE is the head of the Universe. HE possesses an unimaginably high consciousness. Human consciousness is invisible, and GOD’s consciousness is also invisible, otherwise HIS brain would have to be the size of your sun. Since GOD has no material body, HE does not need a material brain to control it. We are GOD’s servants in the truest sense, and we are trying to help you. You see, you are by no means alone. When your ancestors confused our ancestors with GOD and HIS Angels, it was largely due to their inexperience. Now we have clarified this for you.

    GOD IS THE PLANNER, AND WHEN SOMEONE PLANS, THERE IS ALWAYS AN IDEA AT THE BASE. THAT IDEA CHANGES AND IMPROVES. WHAT IS RECORDED IS PUT INTO ACTION, BUT SOMETHING IS CONSTANTLY FOUND THAT REQUIRES IMPROVEMENT. THERE ARE MISTAKES THAT CANNOT BE FORESEEN IN ADVANCE, BECAUSE THE IDEA BEING PUT INTO ACTION HAS NO ANALOGUE. GOD’S GREATNESS GROWS WITH EXPERIENCE. HE FINDS REMEDIES EVEN FOR CONTINGENCIES THAT WERE NOT FORESEEABLE. THIS IS A DIVINE FORMULA.//

    Reply
  29. Shapeshifter

    Glad to see I’m not being censored here. Let’s see if this one goes through.

    > The logic seems solid, but it implicitly assumes that God functions as a kind of tyrant.

    If mercy does not arrive for us, then yes. The moment to prove me wrong is now (I would be glad to be anyway). All the Galactics have to do is uncloak and land their ships. It is as easy as that.

    > What do they actually owe us?

    Section IV of the Galactic Codex. Read it. Refusal of application equals violation.

    > What right do we have to demand their intervention?

    Those who took part on all three 12:21 Ascension Portal meditations (I am one of those, and I did it under direct attack of the Lurker even) definitely have all the right to demand that the Galactics fulfill their part of the deal.

    > Who is responsible for the current situation and for the level of suffering present on this planet? Which groups have voluntarily participated in amplifying control and suffering? And to what extent do other groups have the duty or responsibility to correct the situation?

    Those who are stalling with the liberation, i.e. the Pleiadians, are literally violating the entirety of Section I for as long as they delay. Too much female energy, seriously lacking on masculine energy like the Andromedans and Arcturians who definitely want to intervene ASAP (and would have if not for half a dozen insecure individuals who want to minmax the probabilities of success). It got to a point where Hakann had to listen to a REPTILIAN to be able to make a decision (apparently that didn’t work as well as it should).

    > What is humanity’s share of responsibility? Even if humanity has been heavily influenced, what portion of responsibility remains its own?

    As of right now (post-Cobra’s latest meaningful update), none. We did all we could. Now the ball is on the Galactics’ court.

    > If the Galactics genuinely wish to help us, what criteria, contradictions, consequences, and potential side effects would be legitimate to consider before intervening?

    “Source told you to intervene. If you don’t, that’s insubordination, and you will be reported.” That’s all the motivation they need.

    > What is the role of evil and suffering within creation?

    None. It’s a Lurker side-effect.

    > Could the Infinite Creator be incompetent or imperfect? Could this all be the result of some cosmic mistake that requires correction? If so, why hasn’t the Creator — or its galactic aspects — already intervened in a decisive “Epic Fury” operation?

    Yes, yes, and “because the Pleiadians asked for more time”.

    > Or could it be that all of this has a meaning? That many other criteria, beyond simple comfort, are at play? Could it be that we are merely prisoners of malevolent puppet masters, abandoned to divine indifference or impotence?

    That’s what the Pleiadians say. I don’t buy it. Cobra stated several times that we’re at a point where free will is NOT a deciding factor for the Event anymore. Thus the responsibility is not ours (the ground crew) anymore. It’s on the Galactics.

    Reply
    1. Raksha

      I appreciate your participation. I just find myself not resonating at all with the Cobra metaphysics which are underlying your whole message.

      Reply
      1. the_complaint_department

        Raksha, I think this person and Rose kind of reflect the general argument of people you sought to debate with in the article, and they are making a genuine attempt – sooner or later, ‘Cobra metaphysics’ will have to be brought onto the table.

        The problem is Cobra’s answers rely on these technical elements that his followers sometimes mention (“It’s all because of the ‘lurker’, which can only be fixed with tachions or ‘atvor’ technology” 🙄) that you can only nod or shake your head to…

        It’s very possible that Cobra himself or some plant in his movement has steered a significant amount of people into believing ‘free will is not relevant for the event anymore, you’ve already done your part’ and well; you can see where that logic leads to.

        Reply
        1. Shapeshifter

          This is the point. Either Cobra’s rhetoric is real or it ain’t. The only way to confirm that is Galactics uncloaking and landing ships.

          I want the truth as much as you, but I see a major imbalance in rhetorics over this entire website – you’re all choosing the “light and love” rhetoric, which didn’t do a single thing for any of us.

          I could argue you’re all being deceived by a bunch of charlatans (“channelers”) as much as you argue I am being deceived by Cobra. Difference is I may actually agree with your point if physical intervention doesn’t happen this year, while you will probably keep on pushing the same tired button of “you’re just not doing enough”.

          Try asking anyone in the battlefield of war to “do your part” while they avoid being mauled by ICBMs.

          Reply
          1. the_complaint_department

            Ce qui est amusant, c’est que la seule fois où j’ai vraiment été touché par les paroles de Cobra, c’était lorsqu’elles parlaient de « lumière et d’amour », comme vous le dites. Les enseignements méditatifs qu’il a autrefois promus étaient tout à fait légitimes et ont même eu un impact plus important sur moi que tout ce que vous trouverez ici.

            (Au fait, je pense que vous vouliez dire Ashtar, et non Hakann, dans votre commentaire.)

            Mais peu m’importe qu’ils se manifestent cette année ou jamais : il n’a jamais été question pour l’équipe sur le terrain de baisser sa garde et de dépendre d’une aide extérieure.

            Ce que vous ne comprenez peut-être pas, c’est que ces messages canalisés d’« amour et de lumière » ne sont pas des promesses, mais l’accomplissement même. Nous méritons notre récompense dans le présent ; tout ce qui se manifestera dans le futur n’est qu’un bonus, et croire en autre chose, c’est confier son espoir à des tiers incapables de le tenir.

        2. Raksha

          Indeed, John. What I observe is that Cobra’s metaphysics often leaves people feeling disempowered, frustrated, and at times even angry or resentful.

          To be fair, even truths grounded in love can trigger such reactions. But in Cobra’s framework, the universe is portrayed as a vast, anomalous, and fundamentally unfair mess — and that’s something I simply cannot resonate with.

          Reply
    2. A.S.

      I certainly agree that the Pleiadians have been too indecisive. I channeled Ashtar admitting as much.

      However if I look at things from your / Cobra’s worldview where intervening today is the obviously correct move, it’s a bit weird that there hasn’t been a single group of positive galactics (e.g. Arcturians) who decided “screw those Pleiadians, we’re landing / arresting black hats / hijacking tv broadcasts / blanketing the skies with spaceships ourselves.”

      If Pleiadians are passive and excessively feminine and excessively anti-military-intervention, then it seems weird to believe that they could stop Arcturians from intervening who presumably are more-masculine, more-action-oriented and an older race.

      To me it sounds more logical that the “intervene today or not” choice is actually close, and that’s why there isn’t a single race of positive galactics who are landing. And sure, you could still argue that they’re wrong not to land today, but if it’s close, it at least makes logical sense.

      (Personally I don’t feel I have enough information and wisdom and detachment to be able to say whether they should land today. I think Ashtar’s argument has some weight: “if we land now, humanity’s mode of solving any problem will just become ‘beg galactics for help’; humanity needs to stand on their own feet a bit more first.”)

      Also note that it’s actually in Pleiadian interests for them to land ASAP. That they’re holding off suggest that it’s not just pure passivity on their part. Sure, they might still be excessively conservative, they might still be making a mistake, but it’s a conscious choice on their end — and apparently no other positive galactic race is going against that.

      Reply
      1. Shapeshifter

        > it’s a bit weird that there hasn’t been a single group of positive galactics (e.g. Arcturians) who decided “screw those Pleiadians, we’re landing”

        That’s the funny part, I actually agree with you. Something is fishy. It also further reinforces my point. It’s either sheer incompetence or they’re minmaxing it. I don’t see any other way out of this. “Light and love” it *isn’t*.

        > I think Ashtar’s argument has some weight: “if we land now, humanity’s mode of solving any problem will just become ‘beg galactics for help’; humanity needs to stand on their own feet a bit more first.”

        Hard disagree. Humanity isn’t that dumb. It’s just deeply traumatized. And you remove said trauma by removing the Lurker. It’s at a very minimal percentage right now, enough that it could be considered “safe to uncloak and land”. Question is why don’t the Galactics see it this way. To me they’re completely out of touch with reality as it is down here. Jiva said it best, we’re not chihuahuas.

        How can you “stand up for yourself” in a dystopic 1984-esque prison? It’s a catch-22.

        > Also note that it’s actually in Pleiadian interests for them to land ASAP. That they’re holding off suggest that it’s not just pure passivity on their part.

        I’ll believe it when I see those ships uncloaked and landing. That’s really the only real answer they can give. Anything else they do is a “choice” towards prolonging 3D suffering and further violation of the Galactic Codex.

        Reply
        1. A.S.

          Out of genuine curiosity, what do you mean by “minmaxing it”?

          In this context, do you mean something like “they’re unreasonably unwilling to accept the small risk that comes with landing today, and hence they’re wrongly delaying to make a small risk even smaller”?

          That’s something that could be true, and it’s fair to point to that. Although let me know if I’m misinterpreting you.

          Reply
          1. Shapeshifter

            > what do you mean by “minmaxing it”?

            As far as I can understand, there’s a perceived “threshold” for the Event to be triggered “safely”. Said threshold seems to be “when enough of the Lurker has been cleared”. By (fairly) recent Cobra intel, said percentage is currently “less than 1%” (probably “0.1x%” by now, as per further speculation/calculation from one of the commenters in their blog). Further intel confirms the surface is the only place left to clear (30 meters above and below the surface are clear, top/strangelet bombs are gone, Chimera’s gone, Archons are gone, all that’s left is the “physical leftovers” of the Lurker – currently incarnated minions, cabalists, etc. who are ad-libbing the whole thing because they lost contact with their main source of power, which does not exist anymore in any other density, 4D 5D etc.).

            My question is, “what is the threshold?”. Anyone with a sound mind (and Pareto’s principle in mind) would argue we’re extremely safe by now. Yet Galactics keep stalling. My theory is they actually want to reach “0.00000000…0%”, but they’re not taking into account the law of diminishing returns. Thus, literally “minmaxing” the numbers as per the very definition of the word.

            If that is the case, I could consider that “prolonging unnecessary suffering on Earth”, because we could have been liberated way earlier without any significant downsides or side-effects. Thus, a clear violation of the Galactic Codex (Sections I and IV in their entirety as I see it).

            So we’re at an impasse – either Cobra’s intel is bogus, or we’re dealing with completely out of touch extraterrestrial lunatics. The only answer for that question, to me, is the uncloaking and landing of the ships.

          2. A.S.

            I see. Thanks for the explanation.

            I don’t know about the exact percentages. I’d be surprised if they were literally unwilling to risk an 0.1% chance (then, why aren’t the Arcturians willing to take that risk)?

            But you may very well be right that if Ashtar today fully transparently said “here are the exact percentages and scenarios, and based on this we’re not yet intervening” that most people on this site would disagree with Ashtar and quite possibly get angry at him. So, overall fair point.

            I guess then one could accuse Ashtar of not allowing us the free will to make our own choices — but then he could retort that the current unborn people of Earth also have a stake in this, and that if the choice was purely up to currently-alive people on Earth then the interests of the unborn would be trampled.

            I wouldn’t call the galactics lunatics, but they may be out of touch and possibly excessively cautious / indecisive / something like that.

            In any case, I’m not arguing that the galactics shouldn’t land. I’ve asked them to land several times. But on the other hand, I also don’t think that us Earth humans are perfectly objective evaluators of the question on whether they should land today — we clearly have our biases and interests too. Ultimately, I just don’t know enough.

      2. Raksha

        I agree. Without meaning to sound condescending to anyone, it can come across as somewhat arrogant to assume we know better than the Universe.

        After all, we are currently operating within one of the lower levels of a vast evolutionary spectrum. Higher-density beings, as described, would possess immense wisdom, tools, and capabilities — making something like a mass landing relatively effortless for them.

        So if such an event has not occurred, the most reasonable conclusion may simply be that the timing is not yet aligned.

        Reply
        1. A.S.

          You can argue it both ways. You can argue that us Earth humans aren’t wise enough. Or you can argue that Pleiadians don’t really understand what life is like here on Earth, and if they did, they’d intervene today.

          Though I guess it is pretty telling that, to my knowledge, no one has channeled archangel Michael saying “those Pleiadians are too passive; you’re right, they should intervene today.” Even though archangel Michael is a warrior / protector angel who presumably isn’t all “love and light detachment.”

          Which points in the direction of the Pleiadians either being right not to land today, or at least that that choice is understandable and defensible.

          Ultimately it’s two huge and hard-to-compare things being weighed up. How do you weigh up billions of people’s suffering versus the risk of instability / the landing backfiring because it’s too soon? It’s almost comparing apples to the square root of -1. How do you compare those things?

          Reply
          1. Raksha

            I’ll answer honestly. According to my own biases and distortions, if “Epic Fury” has not been unleashed, then there are likely good reasons for it. The Pleiadians are not acting in isolation; they do not operate in a vacuum.

            I trust that the Universe is moving in the direction that is most appropriate overall. That’s not to say that every aspect of it always acts perfectly, but rather that the Plan itself is highly intricate. And if the “easy way” has not been enacted yet, then perhaps that, in itself, is meaningful.

          2. Shapeshifter

            The Galactic Codex itself should be enough of a comparison. If you’ll let me. “Each sentient being has an unalienable and unconditional right to…”

            * Section I: Positive life experience – we are in the middle of a war, people are dying and the Galactics are not doing a thing (in the physical plane, where the war actually is). That’s the polar opposite of a “positive life experience”
            * Section I/1: Physical and spiritual abundance – we live in a scarcity-based reality on both fields (people starve to death and are brainwashed by religion), and the Galactics haven’t triggered the so-called “Financial Reset” yet. I see no medbeds, no tokamaks, no matter replicators, no anti-grav technology. That’s the polar opposite of “abundance”
            * Section I/2: Ascension – unless you try to convince me that “physical death is the only way to ascend” (because if it was, everybody could just kill themselves and the problem would be solved), I’m not seeing any “ascension” happening here due to lack of action from the Galactics (“suffering” is not a tool for growth, it’s a Lurker-induced disease)
            * Section I/3: Merge with other beings in proportion with their position in the Soul family – twin flame reunions supposedly “can only happen after the Event”, which is being gatekeeped by guess who…
            * Section I/4: All information – this should go without saying… we’re all blind cave salamanders here and it’s been proven the Galactics are purposefully withholding information under several bogus excuses
            * Section I/5: Freedom – goes without saying. Our “free will” is being ignored by the Galactics. Either that or their way of counting free will vectors is completely botched
            * Section II: Be divided and protected from the negative actions of other sentient beings – again, we’re at war. I’m pretty sure nobody asked for grocery prices increasing ten-fold due to several megalomaniacs playing real-life Worms Armageddon

            And them there’s Section III (in short words) – “those who chose to live against the principles of the Galactic Codex will be thrown into the Galactic Central Sun”. Should I consider those Galactics who are stalling with the Earth liberation plan as “beings who chose to live against this principle”? If so, they’re cooked. In a literal sense.

            And Section IV, the one I keep repeating every damn time – “Galactics have the right to intervene when the Codex is violated”. But what if they’re the ones violating it? Who watches the watchmen? We’re surely asking for help since forever (Section IV/1) and they do have the military force to do so (Section IV/2). Yet here we are. Radio silence.

            People are already suffering without intervention. Why does “the thought of intervening too soon” scare them so much? They’re not the ones dying every day. What could possibly be so much worse than what we’re already going through? Unless they themselves KNOW there are consequences for their (lack of) actions. Someone has to be held accountable, and that someone is not the Earth ground crew. I rest my case.

          3. Raksha

            There is a difference, Shapeshifter. In the Ra material, Free Will is the cornerstone. There is no need for a codex or any form of enforcement, because at the deepest level, it simply cannot be violated. What can occur, however, is what Ra calls a “greeting.” And the response to that greeting always remains a choice.

            As for Cobra, I’m not familiar with every detail. I’ve read some of his material, but never felt the need to go much deeper. Correct me if I’m wrong, but his framework seems to begin relatively late in the process. Does he address the underlying Unity? Because if there is true Unity, then the idea of a random, fundamentally malevolent anomaly becomes difficult to reconcile.

            Personally, I find Cobra’s use of highly technical jargon excessive. As John said, you either nod along or you disengage. His information doesn’t seem easily accessible to intuition or to a more heart-centered form of discernment.

            The underlying themes I perceive are those of disempowerment, victimhood, hidden forces acting on our behalf, and constantly shifting timelines — where delays are explained by new obstacles and where higher beings appear unable to act. It can make for compelling science fiction, but from my perspective, it lacks depth or soul.

            To me, fundamental truths tend to be simple, while complexity arises afterward. And I don’t perceive that kind of foundational clarity in Cobra’s framework.

          4. the_complaint_department

            To be REALLY honest, I believe those people evoking the Codex to judge Galactics would not survive a judgement by the same standards.

            The best you can do is help them order their own arguments as clear as possible, without external arguments, until it’s faults become so obvious you can claim them as proof of the opposite.

  30. Rose

    “Evil” is overrated as a spur to spiritual development. Those who feel no compassion for others or reject self-restraint in their interactions with others violate the “free will” of others. Can it be, then, that only evil beings have “free will”? Beyond all the pointless discussions ending in logical cul-de-sacs, I cut to the chase: the majority of life forms on our earth are crying out for and demanding assistance (justice) to stop and remove the evil beings doing all the harm we’re seeing: cannibal elites, masonic military “adventures” that threaten all of us; AI-sponsoring globalists clear cutting forests; digging, drilling into the foundations of our world, filling the skies with chemtrails and the heavens with thousands of EM polluting satellites, 5G, DEWs, pharma killer vaxes and toxic “medicines,” poison food, poison water and on and on. Did any of “us” give our “OK” for this (other than using cellphones, being naive enough to allow white-coated jabbers to kill them)? No.

    Further, the vast majority of us are without the means, methods, access, and connections to properly defend ourselves from these omnipresent, ubiquitous, remorseless killers. The courts, as I have said elsewhere, are a “crap shoot”: No solid, enduring judgments come out of long, drawn-out “trials” — only interim stop gaps easily overturned by toxic political actors.

    Thus, the need for “reinforcements” — yes, from those galactics who claim to possess high levels of compassion and have the means to lend aid.

    POSTSCRIPT: We don’t need more “watchers” standing off, cheering our ineffectual efforts to defend ourselves, “raising our vibration” which is tied to our collective screams for assistance — those beings who “stand by” while our world is scoured of life. Helping us to victory will also be a victory for them, as they put their high principles into action. Amen.

    Reply
    1. Raksha

      If there is some form of calling, then no — evil is not acting unilaterally or in violation of free will. Free will cannot be understood solely as personal desire or conscious preference. There is also the more subtle question of pre-incarnative choices.

      The point is: if large-scale intervention has not occurred, there are likely meaningful reasons for that.

      Reply
      1. Shapeshifter

        The question we should be asking is, “what are those reasons?”. All the Galactics say is “it’s too complex for you to understand because it involves many variables”. They’re always evading the answer. That by itself, to me, is a major red flag.

        I would be more understanding of the situation if they were actually honest with us and told us what the real problem is. Shouldn’t this be a mutual sign of respect towards both races as they themselves want us so much to do? “Not treat them as gods, but as fellow kin”?

        If this farce keeps up, all I see happening is the opposite – they’re gonna be treated as tormentors instead. Anyone who’s studied a bit of history know how the French Revolution went down. I’m pretty sure Galactics don’t want that to happen to either us or themselves. But again, the ball is on their court.

        Reply
        1. A.S.

          Some messages have given reasons why the galactics haven’t intervened, without saying “it’s too complex for you to understand”. It’s just that those reasons don’t feel as emotionally resonant to people as their day-to-day suffering (understandable, but still).

          For example, from my message “Ashtar: Our new commitment” (and this certainly isn’t the only message giving such explanations):

          (…)

          Imagine we actually land today:

          First of all, many of your countries are still being run by puppets of the dark controllers. So there’s a real possibility that if we land today, your militaries will literally start shooting at us, or try to arrest us and take us away to dark underground facilities.

          To ensure our safety, we would either have to arrest many of your leaders preemptively, or disable parts of your militaries. Which is what we may end up doing in late 2026. And in late 2026 we expect that Earth humans will accept us doing that, because pretty much everyone will know just how rotten your leaders are. Also in late 2026, likely fewer dark controller puppets will be in power.

          However if we arrested those leaders today, we think that too many people would perceive that as a hostile alien invasion. Believe it or not, but many sleepers still think that their leaders are okay.

          So yes, the 10-12 more months of delay actually matters. We suspect that average people in late 2026 will be substantially more sick of their leaders than they are today. Additionally, the energies on Earth are so high right now that everyone is being nudged quite rapidly into a higher level of consciousness. And the energies during 2026 will be even higher still.

          Also, imagine we land today. Okay, everyone would be amazed, and our meeting would be wonderful.

          And then a few hours after we’ve landed, people, including those not working for the dark controllers, would demand that we force Russia to leave the Donbass (in Ukraine).

          Even though that situation is actually more complicated than “Ukraine good, Russia evil.” Yet, we couldn’t explain that to people who have watched years or even decades of “Russia is evil” propaganda. They’d just denounce us as evil if we’d do anything other than force the Russians to leave the Donbass.

          Reply
        2. A.S.

          (continuing)

          Plus, even if it was fully morally justified to just kill Russian soldiers until they leave the Donbass (which it’s not): do we really want to set that precedent? Because effectively that would mean that us Galactics would impose military rule over Earth. Which we really don’t want to do.

          Similarly, the day we land, people would demand that we remove Jewish settlers from Palestinian lands. But even if we wanted to do that, we could only achieve that using force. So, we’d have to use force on non-soldier Earth humans.

          Also, people will demand that we shoot down US planes when they bomb innocent countries. Should we do that? If yes, half of America will think we’re monsters. If not, half of the rest of the world will think we’re monsters.

          People will demand that we force the US to drop what they would argue are illegal sanctions. But of course, the US doesn’t see those sanctions as illegal. So then, must we play judge, and if we rule against someone, also use military force to enforce our rulings?

          So basically, the day we land, lots of groups are going to demand that we use our military to help them. And some of those groups are going to make unreasonable demands, or demands that directly contradict other group’s demands.

          But if we ignore this, people might literally try to take us hostage or threaten us in order to get us to do what they want. Even people who don’t work for the dark controllers, but who are simply desperate, may try to do that.

          Most people’s focus would shift from “how can we solve Earth’s problems” to “how can we convince these galactics, via threats or begging or diplomacy or kidnapping, to fix our problems for us?”

          This wouldn’t be good for your development as a species.

          Plus you might get more and more dependent on us over time. If we enforce world peace, then men would tell us that divorce court is unfair to them and then we’d have to send galactic judges to go judge every single divorce case too. And then if people don’t comply with our rulings, send out galactic police to enforce it.

          And then what should we do if Earth courts make another ruling, and Earth police try to enforce another ruling? Should we go to war with Earth’s police forces?

          This would be unworkable.

          Reply
        3. Raksha

          Good question. Many different sources have attempted to explain this in various ways. If you’ve read my messages in this thread, you may have noticed that I tend to lean toward the following ideas:

          respect for free will, honoring experiences chosen at the soul level, and avoiding presenting themselves as saviors — especially as long as humanity remains attached to a sense of helplessness.

          I don’t know fore sure, but I can intuit that this is spiritually heavy of consequences for humanity.

          Reply
    2. Viktor

      Hier ist, was Ashtar zwischen 1955 und 1965 sagte (Mediate Peace Circle in Berlin):

      //Frage: Der Zweite Weltkrieg forderte 55 Millionen Tote und 35 Millionen Verwundete. Zusätzlich gelten 5 Millionen Menschen als vermisst und sind vermutlich ebenfalls tot. War es vertretbar, ein solches Opfer zuzulassen, wenn man Friedensmissionare ist und die Macht hat, die irdischen Mächte zu besiegen?

      ASHTAR: Diese Frage wird aus Ihrer Perspektive gestellt. Aus unserer Sicht erscheinen die Dinge völlig anders. Um diese Situation richtig zu verstehen, ist mehr Wissen erforderlich.

      Ich möchte versuchen, dies zu verdeutlichen. Dieser Planet Erde ist ein Planet der Reinigung. Diejenigen, die auf diesem Planeten inkarniert sind, haben kein sehr hohes spirituelles Niveau. Es ist gerade das Leben in der Materie, unter irdischen Umständen, das sie auf ein höheres Niveau erheben sollte. Der Mensch auf Erden muss lernen, friedlich mit anderen zusammenzuleben. Obwohl der Mensch auf dieser Erde viel lernt und manchmal sein Genie entfaltet, bleibt er in seinem Verhalten und seiner Moral rückständig. Wirtschaftlicher und technischer Erfolg sind nicht die einzigen entscheidenden Faktoren für die Reife des Menschen.

      Wir erforschen die Gründe für diese Unreife. Wir versuchen, Ihnen zu helfen. Doch der Widerstand, auf den wir stoßen, ist enorm. Daher sind Leben und Tod bedeutungslos; spirituelle Reife ist bedeutungslos. Ob ein Mensch früher oder später im Krieg stirbt oder einer Katastrophe zum Opfer fällt, ist unerheblich. In den meisten Fällen kehrt der Mensch auf die eine oder andere Weise ins spirituelle Leben zurück, ohne seinen Charakter verfeinert zu haben.

      Und diese Situation würde sich nicht ändern, selbst wenn die gesamte Menschheit auf Erden mit einem Schlag in die jenseitigen Sphären verbannt würde.

      Daher sehen wir keinen Grund, die vollständige Vernichtung der gesamten Menschheit hinauszuzögern oder zu verhindern.

      Doch Gott hat einen Widersacher, und er wäre hocherfreut, wenn er einen Teil der göttlichen Schöpfung vernichten könnte. Für ihn wäre dies ein Sieg. Höchstwahrscheinlich ist dies genau der Grund, warum wir die globale Zerstörung der Erde verhindern wollen. Am wichtigsten ist jedoch die Absicht, die Menschheit auf Erden durch detaillierte Erklärungen zu veredeln und dadurch den Sinn der Erde zu bestätigen. Das irdische Leben sollte nicht nur der materiellen Entwicklung dienen, sondern auch die spirituelle Reife der Menschen fördern. Diese Reife kann niemals durch erfolgreichen Atheismus oder falsche, scheinheilige Frömmigkeit erreicht werden.

      Von den 55 Millionen Menschen, die im Ersten Weltkrieg ihr Leben verloren, erfuhren fast 54 Millionen keine Läuterung ihrer Seelen. Sie traten in die spirituelle Welt ein, wie sie vor ihrer Inkarnation waren. Sie lernten zu kämpfen, erlernten die Sprache und besaßen Grundkenntnisse in Wissenschaft und Technik. Nur die Religion blieb ihnen völlig unverständlich. Hätten diese 54 Millionen Kriegsopfer überlebt, hätte sich in Bezug auf ihre spirituelle Läuterung wahrscheinlich nichts qualitativ verändert.

      Wenn wir annehmen, dass der Krieg 2 Milliarden Menschenleben forderte, wären fast 2 Milliarden unrein in das Reich Gottes eingegangen. Doch dieselbe Situation bliebe bestehen, selbst wenn diese Menschen eines natürlichen Todes sterben.

      Daher habe ich erkannt, dass es hier um etwas ganz anderes geht und nicht um die enorme Massensterblichkeit, die während eines so schrecklichen Krieges auftritt.

      Jeder Mensch, der durch einen Unfall, eine Kugel oder eine Bombe stirbt, kehrt unversehrt mit seiner Seele in die spirituelle Welt zurück. Nach einiger Zeit kann er wieder auf die Erde zurückkehren, um einen neuen Reinigungsversuch zu unternehmen.//

      Reply
  31. Ed

    RAK
    THE
    SHA

    Is it
    Truly
    You

    Aaaahhh
    BRILLIANCE
    Gotta get those
    Cheep
    Sunglasses
    Brightness
    In
    The
    Delight
    We
    See
    Yes

    And of course
    😘💎💓
    Always looking in…
    💛
    Golden

    Shambala
    Is always in …

    Reply
  32. John

    The epicurean ‘paradox’ is a logic loophole for the self-serving mind, which is not ‘omniscient’ of itself as the active expression of god’s omnipotence AND entirely responsible for what it perceives as benevolent or not.

    God’s omnipotence means it CAN experience multiple paradoxical realities simultaneously, but the ones that effectively DO experience at least one of them are us as linear-processing physical actors.

    Our perception of ‘benevolence’ stems from our parallel-processing extra-physical connection with alternative realities (known as the soul) which constantly guides us to a reality which maximizes god’s Potential.

    Free will only exists at this intermediary ‘band’ were reality potentials brew and collapse, below which consciousness sleeps and above which all works together as one.

    Reply
    1. Ed

      Man o man …

      Big J

      You just opened that
      Box again

      Correction
      Box opens it self
      Again
      And
      Again

      Triple A insurance
      Tripartite
      Wins
      No
      End

      Q1051

      Reply
    2. Raksha

      There are some solid perspectives here. According to Ra, the Law is One, and very little more can be said about ultimate reality itself.

      What they call the Law of Free Will is the first distortion. It allows the Creator — which is everything, and therefore, in a sense, nothing — to experience itself by actualizing potential. Ra also refers to this as the Law of Confusion. Without confusion (or distortion), no true choice would be possible.

      The second distortion is the Law of Love, which enables Creation to remain unified even as it becomes manifest.

      The third distortion is the Law of Light (sometimes understood as sovereignty). This one is more complex and relates to the very structure or design of Creation itself.

      From these three primary distortions — as Ra describe them — an infinite number of lesser distortions arise.

      But Free Will (or Confusion) remains the cornerstone.

      Reply
      1. Raksha

        One may also notice that clear parallels can be drawn between these three laws and the various traditions of sacred trinities found across cultures — such as Father–Son–Holy Spirit (though one might argue it would be more balanced as Mother), or Brahma–Vishnu–Shiva, among others.

        Reply
  33. Nixael

    This isn’t the place for debate, as it’s impossible to express oneself properly, as no comment, even a short one, has been made recently.

    The potential for outside help always exists. It’s not written in stone that it’s forbidden.

    Reply
    1. Nixael

      I think that in times of chaos it is better to look inward for stability rather than engage in external debates or disputes.

      Reply
      1. Raksha

        Looking inward is not incompatible with engaging in healthy debate. And stability is not necessarily the goal of such a discussion

        Reply
  34. Lyra

    You ask important questions, Raksha. And yes, I agree that an understanding of free will is key.

    Blaming the Galactics and/or God (whatever you perceive Him/Her to be) is pointless. Humanity made (or at least contributed heavily) to this mess – and we’re the ones to clean it up. Would any good parent or guardian (by analogy, God or the Galactics) observe a child messing up his room, and then clean it up for him? What would he learn? Would he be strengthened, or weakened?

    From personal observation, many people do not truly want freedom, because freedom involves responsibility. They prefer to live under someone else’s idea of truth, to blame rather than act. From that perspective, the real battle isn’t between good and evil, but between cowardice and courage – between those who choose to take responsibility and act, and those who choose the comfort of chains.

    Debating the “portion of responsibility” of humanity is pointless. If “evil” took root on Earth, even due to outside forces, it is because humanity (whether consciously or unconsciously) left an energetic door open for it to do so.

    If 5D is a frequency, the way out for humanity is to raise its own vibration. We do this by realising Yeshua’s words that “The Kingdom is within”. Both the Kingdom of Light/Heaven, and the kingdom of darkness. You get to choose. Free will. It’s an inside job. Through healing work, whatever is inside WILL eventually manifest outside. As above, so below. As inside, so without. This is how we birth New Earth, one person at a time.

    Reply
    1. A.S.

      Indeed.

      What most people seem to want is:
      – comfort
      – someone to tell them “you’re the good, moral ones; put me in charge and I’ll take care of everything, and you won’t have to do anything”

      Although I don’t think this is humanity’s nature, it’s merely how people respond to feeling overburdened / confused / alienated / traumatized.

      All the same, overburdened / confused / alienated / traumatized people can choose to remain in this state, or can choose to walk the path of healing / growth / self-improvement and eventually outgrow this.

      Reply
      1. Lyra

        Yes! Trauma plays a significant role – and we all have it, to an extent. Healing starts with owning it: “Yes, I was a victim (out of ignorance, childhood circumstances, whatever). But I choose not to remain one.” Easier said that done, I know, and it can feel very unfair. But it’s the way out.

        Thanks, A.S.

        Reply
    2. Raksha

      Good points. I also believe that, regardless of the degree of dark influences humanity may have received — no matter their psychic or technological superiority — humanity still has to “open the door,” so to speak.

      Ra expands extensively on this idea through what they call “greetings.” They also speak about the concept of “calling” — a kind of spiritual openness that allows such influences, whether benevolent or hostile, to enter. Without this calling, no external influence can truly take root.

      Importantly, this calling does not originate from the conscious mind.

      For that reason, I see little value in blaming the Galactics — and even less in blaming those who genuinely care for humanity and are already assisting us, even if not in the exact ways we might expect or prefer.

      Reply
      1. Lyra

        Well said. And it makes sense that “calling” originates from the subconscious — which is hugely shaped by buried trauma. Another pointer to the importance of shadow work and energetic boundaries.

        Thanks, Raksha. Great post that raises important perspectives.

        Reply
        1. Raksha

          Not necessarily the subconscious — though that depends on how we define the term. The calling is better understood as the total “signal” being broadcast, consciously, subconsciously, and at the level of the Soul or Higher Self.

          An open intervention might answer the calling of some, while being a disservice to others. I don’t think that’s how the Universe chooses to operate.

          The good news is that the calling functions like a kind of spiritual or energetic vote. But this “majority” is not quantitative — it is based on spiritual momentum. In other words, it is not necessary for 51% of humanity to be calling for contact with benevolent Galactics.

          Reply
          1. Lyra

            I agree with your statement about “51%” being unnecessary. I think it was Gregg Braden who wrote that we only need the square root of 1% to reach critical mass for ascension. It’s known as the Maharishi Effect — the minimum number of people required to trigger a global shift in consciousness.

            In a world of, say, 8 billion people, 1% is 80 million. The square root of that is roughly 9,000 people.

            Astrologer Pam Gregory suggests the same concept — that very small, “coherent” groups can influence an entire population’s frequency, similar to how a single light bulb can illuminate a dark room.

            That’s a very hopeful scenario.

          2. Raksha

            Ra talked about the Law of Square. Honestly it was too complicated for me to really understand. What I understood is that the momentum is squared based on the original seeding, but the numbers are not fixed, there is no easy to go formula. In other words, it is exponential but also based on the spiritual power of each seeder.

      2. Raksha

        I would also add that, if All is One, then blaming others is ultimately blaming oneself. And if we accept the idea of Starseeds, then blaming the Galactics becomes, in a sense, a double form of self-blame.

        What greater expression of dedication, love, and care for other-selves could there be than the willingness to temporarily set aside a more expanded identity in order to descend so deeply into this complex and often chaotic experience — simply to help alleviate suffering?

        Help, there is.

        Reply

Comment