MSM Attacks ‘Sound of Freedom’ Film As ‘Q-Anon Conspiracy Theory’

Posted on by — 4 Comments ↓

Numerous mainstream media outlets disparaged the anti-child trafficking thriller Sound of Freedom as being based on nothing but a “conspiracy theory” linked to “Q Anon.”

Rolling Stone, the Washington Post, CNN and The Guardian all condemned the box office hit, which is based on true events, as a baseless conspiracy born out of the Q Anon movement.

Rolling Stone claimed the film was “designed to appeal to the conscience of a conspiracy-addled boomer.”

WaPo accused the “low-budget” film’s star, Jim Caveizel, who plays former DHS agent and child rescuer Tim Ballard, of “embracing Q Anon,” while the Guardian called it a “paranoid Q-adjacent thriller.”

CNN claimed the drama injected “Q Anon concepts” like child trafficking to induce a “moral panic.”

Why left is appearing to seethe so badly over the true story laid out in Sound of Freedom that exposes the multi-billion child trafficking trade?

Many on social media called out these news networks’ bad-faith reporting in response, with some noting how they took on the opposite tone for the questionable Netflix movie “Cuties” in 2020, which is about a pre-teen girl who starts a “twerking dance squad” in defiance of her parents.

Sound of Freedom producer Eduardo Verástegui warned on Fox News that the establishment is “trying to take this movie away from theaters” because it aims to expose the $150-billion-a-year child trafficking industry.

“I’m just so grateful that people are showing up in theaters. I mean, we have, we have a goal of 2 million people in theaters for 2 million children that will be traffic this year. And we’re very close to, to get to that goal,” he said.

“And this is amazing. And it’s important because if we succeed in the in theaters, then the media is going to talk about this problem. People will not know about this, because there’s a lot of people they don’t know that this is real. They think that this is too far from them. It’s happening next door behind your house. And the more people if more people know about this problem.”

Sound of Freedom greatly outperformed box office expectations, hitting over $14 million on its July 4th opening alone.

Caveizel expressed gratitude to audiences for watching the important film after news emerged it was beating out Disney’s Indiana Jones and The Dial of Destiny in theaters.

Notably, Disney had purchased the rights to Sound of Freedom in 2018 but shelved the release, leading some to speculate that decision was not coincidental.

Be sure to catch Sound of Freedom in a theater near you!

**By Jamie White

**Source

4 Replies to “MSM Attacks ‘Sound of Freedom’ Film As ‘Q-Anon Conspiracy Theory’”

  1. harrrrrie

    What is wrong with MSM and Rolling Stone that they even feel the need to attack a movie. What are they hiding?
    Of course there is trafficking. It’s reported all the time in local news.
    There are huge tunnels all over underneath the United States. When they overlap the missing people map over the tunnel map, most missing people are brought to these tunnels and never seen again. These tunnels need to be continously monitored. The government knows about these tunnels and missing people and does nothing. It makes my stomach sick.

    Reply ↓
  2. Pendragon

    The MSM along with Disney are super terrified of this movie, and the awakening that is occurring. Disney have been trying for 5 years to block this movie been released. Scared much? Now the paid media shills, hell hounds and reality deniers are out in the force. They are too late, eyes widen open.

    Reply ↓
  4. C

    Reminder:
    “4881 Oct 17, 2020 12:36:26 PM EDT
    There is ‘Q’. 1
    There are ‘Anons’. 2
    There is no ‘QANON’. 3
    Media labeling as ‘QANON’ is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] ‘Q’ to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
    WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
    DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
    …”

    “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” – Arthur Schopenhauer

    The push to disparage this film may be another aspect of the psy-op; part of the “pr”; intended to accelerate getting the movies subject matter front and center. Streisand Effect.

    Discernment.

    peace everyOne 🙏🕊

    Reply ↓

Comment