Tunia: Discrimination Land

Channeler: A.S.

My dearest brothers and sisters,

This is Tunia speaking. I love you so very much.

Today I will tell you a story that is likely going to make you quite uncomfortable. However, there is an important point to this story, as will be revealed later in the message. Or perhaps you will realize the point yourself during the story.

Imagine there is a land called Discrimination Land.

In Discrimination Land, it is socially acceptable to say in public that black people are the source of society’s problems.

In Discrimination Land, even government officials sometimes joke that white people are superior to black people in some way. People don’t get in trouble for making these jokes. In fact, many white people see it as charming when someone jokes that white people are superior to black people in some way. If a black person were to speak out against this, it would be the black person speaking out who would be seen as doing something inappropriate.

Conversely, in Discrimination Land, white people are less accepting of jokes about black people being superior to white people in some way. White people are generally fine with jokes about black people being stupid, but not with jokes about white people being stupid.

In Discrimination Land, some black people are loved and respected, including by white people. However, just an average black person, without anything special going for him, is sometimes treated as suspicious until proven innocent, just because he’s black. It is socially acceptable to say that you crossed the street because you saw a black person walking towards you and you felt unsafe.

Most people subconsciously see black people as inherently not having any value and as only having value if they can do or produce things. Meanwhile, most people subconsciously see white people as inherently having value. Consequently, there are a lot of resources and organizations that are openly saying that they are only helping white people, while there are very few black-only resources and organizations. There is also much more government funding for help-only-white-people organizations than for help-only-black-people organizations.

In Discrimination Land, social clubs for exclusively white people are seen as completely legitimate and understandable. It is seen as obvious that some white people want to be in a space where there are no black people present. Meanwhile, social clubs for exclusively black people are seen as suspicious and potentially problematic. The only legitimate kind of black-people-only club would be one in which black people are explicitly there to better themselves in some way. But just a black-people-only club where black people can hang out with each other and talk and have a drink and perhaps play some chess, oh no no no, a number of white people see that as very bad. Even though white people also think that it is completely acceptable and understandable for a white person to want to be in a space where there are explicitly no black people allowed.

In Discrimination Land, courts and police are theoretically supposed to be fair. However if there is a conflict between a white and a black person, cops and courts are usually strongly biased in favor of the white person. And everyone knows this.

White people also get measurably lighter punishment for the same crime than black people do. This is seen as a good thing, because black people are seen as inherently more violent, and thus as deserving of harsher punishment if they commit a crime. Few people care that even if black people really are more violent in general, that doesn’t mean that it’s fair for an individual black person to receive a harsher punishment for the same crime than an individual white person would.

White people like to talk about equality. However, if there was a referendum on whether practical measures should be implemented to make sure that courts gave equal punishment to white and black offenders, many and perhaps most white people would secretly vote against these measures.

Many white people like that white people get lighter punishment for the same crime. Some white people don’t like this, but also don’t do anything, even though if the moderate white people took a bit of action then this unfairness would be resolved quite quickly.

That’s a pattern in general: you have the white people who openly say that it is good that they have privilege over black people in certain areas, such as being preferentially hired. These white people will often actively work to defend or even extend their privilege, and they will actively work to hurt black activists. And then you have the moderate white people, who acknowledge that it is unfair, but they don’t take any action to change things and they also don’t support initiatives by black activists. And so, the discrimination continues.

White people may be willing to help an individual black person if that individual is particularly well-liked or seen as valuable. However, if black people as a group have a problem, then white people generally only give lip service to the idea of helping black people. Meanwhile, white people feel that black people should tangibly and practically help white people.

Even if the problem that black people face is clear systemic discrimination against them, white people will generally only give lip service to the idea of helping them. However, if white people feel that they are being disadvantaged in any small way whatsoever, then white people will mobilize and take action and ask for tangible help from black people.

In Discrimination Land, many businesses will prioritize hiring white people over black people, either as official policy or secretly. Again, some white people openly like this, and some white people don’t like it but they also don’t lift a finger to change the situation.

Similarly, there are also quite a few scholarships for exclusively white people, even though white people are already more likely to attend university.

It is not socially acceptable to be a black people’s rights activist. Even the more moderate white people often oppose black people’s rights activists.

In Discrimination Land, far more black people kill themselves than white people. But no one really cares. Usually, people just say that it’s up to black people to change this.

In Discrimination Land, black people do the vast majority of the hard, tough, dangerous, dirty work that is needed to keep society running. Far more black people die at work than white people. White people do safer and relatively more comfortable work, with fewer and more convenient hours. These kinds of comfortable office jobs often discriminate against black people during the hiring process.

Are white people grateful that black people do the hard, uncomfortable, demanding jobs that are needed to keep society running? Usually not. It’s more common that white people work fewer hours and do more convenient and comfortable work, and then complain that black people earn more money. Even though white people make as much as black people if they work the same hours at the same job.

Any perceived unfairness against white people is complained about bitterly by some white people, even if that unfairness doesn’t actually exist.

In Discrimination Land, if a ship is sinking and there are too few spots on the rescue boat, people think that black people should willingly give up their spots to white people and accept their death. A number of white people also think that if war breaks out, that the government should draft black people but not white people to go fight. Meanwhile, people talk about black privilege.

In Discrimination Land, more research money is spent on a kind of cancer that primarily affects white people, and far less research money is spent on a kind of cancer that only affects black people. Despite this, many white people insist that they are victims and that society is rigged to benefit black people.

Sometimes the term toxic blackness is used. It is not socially acceptable to talk about toxic whiteness.

If black people complain, both black and white people often tell them to “black up”, which means: shut up, don’t complain, don’t show your pain and go do some productive work.

The supposed equality movement for white and black people is called White-ism, and it contains some white people who absolutely hate black people. The more moderate white people in the White-ism movement make no real effort to tell the people in their movement to stop openly saying that they hate black people. They are more concerned with trying to get black people to behave in a way that benefits white people.

Despite the claims that White-ism is a true equality movement that is good for white and black people, White-ism almost never takes tangible action to address clear cases where black people face systemic discrimination.

So, that is what Discrimination Land is like.

It sounds like a horrible dystopia, right?

Well, you may very well be living in Discrimination Land. If you replace “black person” with “man”, and “white person” with “woman,” then the above dystopia is the West as it is, today.

So yes, the entire story was one big metaphor about the West in 2024, with black people standing in for men and white people standing in for women.

People are used to thinking of men as evil privileged oppressors, and think of black people as victims who should be helped. Therefore people are often emotionally fine with men being treated badly, but not with black people being treated badly. That is why his message is so uncomfortable.

However, in the West in 2024, I really don’t think that it is useful to treat men as evil privileged oppressors.

Are there individual men who genuinely are evil privileged oppressors? Yes, there are. But that doesn’t justify treating men as a group in that way. In the West in 2024, average men really don’t have more privilege on the whole than average women do.

Rich men also aren’t rigging society to benefit men — see for example more money being spent on breast cancer research than on prostate cancer research, or there being more women’s university scholarships than men’s university scholarships even though already more women attend university.

I’m not saying that black people and women don’t face discrimination. And yes, there are differences in context between men, black people, women and white people.

Still, if some treatment of black people in this message made you really uncomfortable, then I invite you to consider if it is okay to treat men that way. Because I really don’t think it is helpful to treat people more harshly — in this case men — just because they were born into a certain group.

With respect to some parts of my message, people might want to argue: “it is understandable to treat men more harshly, because men statistically commit more crimes.” Well, poor illiterate immigrants who come from a completely different culture statistically commit more crimes too than native-born citizens, so should we also treat these immigrants more harshly than native-born citizens? See, immediately it becomes uncomfortable again (at least to some people).

Personally, I’m in favor of saying that if anyone commits a crime — be they a man, an immigrant, a Muslim, a Jew, or whoever — then hold that individual accountable. But don’t treat the entire group harshly just because that group as a whole is allegedly more likely to do bad things. Hence, don’t give an individual man a harsher sentence for the same crime than a woman, just because men as a group are seen as more violent than women.

Now yes, despite all this, I completely acknowledge that society is harsh and unfair and awful towards women. And I am sorry, my beautiful sisters, you indeed deserve to be treated so much better than you are. However, average men aren’t treated any better by society than you are. Saying that the problem is the patriarchy is in practice often just a roundabout way of engaging in White-ism, to use my earlier metaphor for feminism.

The solution for women isn’t fighting men, or trying to out-compete men or trying to demasculinize men.

The solution for women is to come together with men and to actually work together for the common good — and that includes doing more than giving lip service to the idea of changing areas where women are unfairly privileged over men.

From my perspective, it’s a bit shocking that some women have great ideals and are very warm towards men they like, but are cold and callous and uncaring towards average men, and wouldn’t even vote to end pro-female discrimination if someone created a referendum for that. Obviously this isn’t true for all women, but it is true for a substantial number of women.

Think back to Discrimination Land earlier. Do you think that there can be a white person who has reached the highest levels of spiritual attainment, who never spends a little effort to help a black person and who never speaks out against the unfairness that benefits her group and hurts black people? I don’t think so. I think in this case, such a white person is either still dealing with her own trauma (fair enough), or she is in separation consciousness. Because if she genuinely was in unity consciousness and indeed saw black people — men — as being part of herself, then she would at least occasionally spend a little effort to help a man or speak out on their behalf.

Or alternatively, you can adopt the traditional feminine mindset, where your role as a woman is to be modest and respectful towards all non-criminal men, and to obey and support and love and cherish and provide housekeeping and sex to your husband, and to give your husband authority over your family and over society. As a traditional woman, don’t divorce your husband just because you’re not happy and then take half his stuff. If you fulfill the traditional feminine role, then it’s not inconsistent to have the attitude that men should fix their own problems, and fix the problems of society besides.

It’s fine to expect men to fix society and fulfill the traditional male role — if you fulfill the traditional female role. Because if you expect men to be the ones to take responsibility to fix society, then you must give them authority over society. It doesn’t make sense to expect someone to take responsibility without giving them authority.

The other option is to adopt the modern position that men and women should be equal and have equal roles. Well, in this case — you want men to help women out and you want men to address things that are structurally unfair towards women, right? Well, if you want equality, that means that women should also actively help men out and actively work to fix structural unfairness towards men.

It doesn’t really work to say “oh yeah, I agree, but some other woman should do that” or “it’s not my responsibility to help men” because almost all women are saying that. If courts or hiring practices blatantly discriminated against women, then women also wouldn’t accept it if nearly all men said “oh yeah, I agree, but some other man should fix that” or “it’s not my responsibility to help women.”

If women killed themselves three to four times as much as men, or if 92% of workplace deaths occur to women, then women would expect men to immediately help them, right? And indeed, men would immediately take action in that situation. Well, in reality, men kill themselves three to four times as much as women do, and 92% of workplace deaths happen to men. So, it would be good if women could start helping men — I know life isn’t all sunshine and roses for women either, but women don’t face the level of systemic discrimination that men do.

Even the more moderate and reasonable women usually don’t support male men’s rights activists, even the ones who make very reasonable requests. Hence, men can’t change this by themselves. Moreover, it’s not a very enlightened perspective to be in a group with unfair privilege and to say that it’s up to the discriminated-against people to change that.

I’m not saying that every woman must dedicate her life to men’s rights. I’m just suggesting that women occasionally speak up against the unfairness, or occasionally spend a little effort to help average individual men.

Men have been a lot better in the last hundred years with listening to women and agreeing to reasonable requests, than women have been about listening to average men and agreeing to reasonable requests. Maybe that was appropriate in the past, back when women genuinely didn’t have certain rights. But it’s not appropriate anymore, because average men really aren’t unfairly privileged anymore. The number of men in certain highly paid positions is just a result of more men choosing to study certain subjects and more men choosing to work 60+ hours per week.

If you would protest against companies preferentially hiring white people, but wouldn’t protest against preferential hiring of women, then you might have some victim mentality or anti-man resentment to work through.

If women demanded an end to female-only hiring quotas for example, it would go away immediately. And the day that women actually take some real-world action to help average men, might very well be the day that your society starts healing. Until that happens, your society might very well keep declining.

Average men are the workhorse of society. So long as the workhorse keeps being neglected and beaten and told to fix its own problems, I think your society will just keep getting worse (so long as there is no big intervention). If everyone sees it as not their responsibility to help the workhorse, then everyone suffers, because you all need the workhorse to work, and the workhorse is currently sick and can’t do it alone and needs love and care.

Let’s say that the supply of money in a society remains stable, however the workhorse of society is severely ill and as a result fewer goods are produced. Well, now the same amount of money is chasing fewer goods, and hence prices go up. And hence there is inflation. So yes, reckless amounts of new money are being created, but part of the inflation also comes from the workhorse of society — average men — struggling so much, and no one helping the horse.

The good news is that even relatively small actions can make a big difference. I understand that not everyone has the energy to organize an anti-male-discrimination demonstration. But even just being kind to an average man (and not only being kind towards the exceptional men), or giving men a compliment, or listening to them can make their month.

This channeler still remembers that a random woman gave him a glass of water a decade ago when he was outside working during a hot day. Seemingly average men are very unused to receiving kind gestures from random women. Men are also so unused to being appreciated that they often remember compliments for years, or for the rest of their lives. So, you can help a man a lot with not much effort.

Even just a little appreciation and kindness goes a long way.

I wish you a very good week.

With love,

Your star sister,
Tunia

Note from the channeler: I was touched by this one-minute youtube video from psychiatrist Alok Kanojia (“Dr K“):: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/PCtpYTiyoP0

For Era of Light

**Source

**These channelings are exclusively submitted to Eraoflight.com by the channeler. If you wish to share them elsewhere, please include a link back to the original post.

50 Replies to “Tunia: Discrimination Land”

  1. Nameless

    Basically, being of the same race means there is a high probability of having the same behavior, same thoughts, same interests, same words, same questions, and same opinions. The probability of having the same experience.
    Basically, if the basic consciousness of humans that you are talking about is commonly considered to be the same species and is shared, the probability of that happening should be high.
    If you don’t experience the same behavior, same interests, same thoughts, same questions, and same words as humans, that means there’s something different, right?

    Reply
    1. the_complaint_department

      It is rather difficult to follow your train of thought, the chosen words seem to me rather dispassionate and out of sync with the emotional content they suggest. Since the answers for most of your questions were already addressed by other articles from this channel, I’ll try to cover them briefly and leave further examination to your own research.

      Pleiadeans are one of many galactic races invested in earth humans development. They have enough technology to do anything you and many others believe would be awesome and solve all our problems (and enough intelligence and wisdom to actually do it without using any technology at all), and VERY solid understanding of what careless intervention leads to (research ‘Fall of Atlantis’).

      We fail to acknowledge our faults from the past, and play victims of circumstance. Arrogantly, pathetically, all the time. They are sorry for us because of that, not because they believe Source was ever unfair to us. The anger you speak of and from, is because your mind insists ‘fairness’ has to be a certain way. Our hearts know what is fair, but we’re indoctrinated to overrule them with fear and ego survival logic.

      The apparently superficial topics brought up here are actually connected to the roots of all our problems. The human psyche is a living organism constantly trying to heal from deep wounds: they will stand out like sore thumbs in casual conversation, but tackle them directly and they will close up and persist.

      Just listening to others respectfully and being heard helps us heal, even when we fail to realize it or disagree about a certain topic: it’s the exchange of energy. It’s an external reference. And for the collective human, this is what is being offered here: a genuine external reference. Try beaming some love up to the stars and stop denying the replies you feel as ‘make-believe from your head’.

      In truth, galactic souls of different origins already walk among us and do this job unbeknownst to themselves – for protection against well-informed-and-powered but ill-meaning people who are also part of the game. As a species we are perceived by the Galactics as bearers of a very rich genetic diversity and a relatively cohesive and unified collective (un)consciousness that is deeply united with Gaia, who were entrusted with reaching the answer for an important part of the galactic equation.

      So when we discuss our problems and views here in this board, we are genuine representatives of conflicted groups within our planet. Our thoughts and feelings towards each other don’t have to directly reach our leaders to influence the fate of the planet and eventually the galaxy: the truth is not out there, it is in here.

      Finally, your thoughts -however sincere- don’t seem ready to hear the answer that yes, these people you so obviously consider invaders and responsible for our problems are indeed human and were given equal chances to learn, and to deny them the knowledge we can indeed lovingly kick their asses without external assistance does not honor either of our humanities – and only pushes our galactic responsibility to do so to another planet, another time – and God forbid – another Atlantis.

      Reply
      1. nameless

        Thank you for your sincere reply.
        Are you in any way with a delusional person?
        They may look similar.
        It’s like calling a bad world a good world.
        I don’t think your answer ultimately contributes to the solution.
        Is your world good?
        Why are you seeing this article?
        Are you solving the problem?
        You probably chose the good world with your free will.
        And you probably asked for help. Yes?
        Has your life changed for the better?
        What do you think about humanity repeating mistakes?
        What if it’s not the aliens’ fault but humanity’s fault?
        Conversely, what if it’s not humanity’s fault but the aliens’ fault?
        Shouldn’t the problem be solved by aliens?
        Is it bad to speak calmly?
        It doesn’t seem bad for you to judge calmly, too.
        The Earth is full of scammers.
        You are not the channeler who wrote this, but you always reply.
        Your writing also seems quite cold to me.
        I don’t care if your writing is cold or not.
        I just hope it can be accomplished or resolved.

        Reply
      2. nameless

        May your life be happy in a good world, without suffering and with good beings. And unless you’re some kind of bad guy.
        This is my hope.
        You know that there are a lot of scammers in channeling posts, right?
        Please be careful.

        Reply
        1. nameless

          What do you think about the races that have ignored the darkness for over 2000 years, claiming to know the truth?
          Do you think they are incompetent? Do you think they don’t care?

          Reply
  2. Nameless

    Let’s unite with other good and capable races to defend and eliminate the corrupt and deceiver invaders that plague the Earth. If you judge that your race is human, won’t you act and speak like me? I don’t know if your species doesn’t care about details, doesn’t pay attention to detail, or doesn’t have technical skills, but if you were a human, you would have been attacked and tortured. Don’t you think it’s so strange that they don’t even care about human freedom and the liberation of the Earth? Especially since they don’t even speak or write. They don’t picket anything. Who do these people think they are? Do you really think they are human? Even if a human being is tortured, attacked, and committed a crime that only humans suffer from, if he pretends not to know and lies even though he knows the situation, do you think he is a human being?

    Reply
    1. Nameless

      If they were human, don’t you think they would think, act, and say the same things as me?
      What if they suffer the same thing as me? I guess the questions you had about your species were similar.

      Reply
      1. Nameless

        Your kind, the majority on Earth, look at them and think of them as if they were human beings. That’s a mistake. How can beings who are subjected to severe torture afford such freedom? Shouldn’t they have written like me?

        Reply
        1. Nameless

          Your races
          See them, the majority on the planet, and think of them like humans.
          That’s a mistake.
          Assuming that they are seriously tortured on Earth, Can they act leisurely?
          Wouldn’t they have written like this like me?

          Reply
  3. Nameless

    Tunia To be honest, I often don’t understand your race. In many ways. Don’t races with Elohim-level abilities help liberate humans on Earth? What happened to your species deciding? If you don’t have the skills, you can ask for help. I am very disappointed that you do not distinguish between humans and other races on Earth. In particular, it seems that your species’ long-range technology is not good, so it seems necessary to improve it. I think your race is, in some ways, very unfair. Especially for humans. There is something about your species’ way of thinking that causes anger in humans. It is an abnormal unfairness that causes herbivores and carnivores to be raised in the same space, but is said to be good for both, and continues to be eaten. Isn’t your species partly responsible for putting the two in a cage together? If it is not partly your species’ fault, then run to a competent, good species for help.

    Reply
    1. Nameless

      To be honest, I would be more curious about your racial battles, improving the global situation, freedom, human liberation, etc., rather than your posts about dividing left and right, your love stories, or posts about racial discrimination between women, men, blacks, and whites. Basically, I’m not interested in these posts. No, you won’t see it very well.
      They say your species looks forward to people who are interested in articles from this perspective and write opinions. Who do you really think are these people who take interest in such things while in the middle of a battle and waste their time without even talking about the main point?
      And I’m looking forward to their reactions…. I think that kind of discrimination is bad, but well, it would be nice if people on Earth could be enlightened by your writing. Then there will be no need to fight. Of course they are problematic.

      Reply
      1. Nameless

        Nowadays, your channeler writes a lot of articles on such topics, but in fact, the probability of problematic people seeing such articles here is very low. And I don’t engage in such acts of discrimination, so you don’t have to worry.
        I know very well that their strange ideology and discrimination issues are bad, and unlike you, I honestly don’t even expect the discrimination to get better. You could at least round these people up and have them indoctrinate you, but I don’t think your kind would do that. I’ve already surpassed that for a long time.
        There is no use talking only to people you know. Talking about a problem to people who don’t have a problem doesn’t work with people who have a problem.
        Are you going to gather people with problems, give a speech, and persuade them to stop crime and discrimination? Be careful not to fall victim to their crimes.

        Reply
        1. Nameless

          Well, if they were good beings, they could have been interested in places like this. Why did your race and mine end up in war and crime?

          Reply
  4. Matteo Brustolon

    Mmm the discrimination between expeptional men and average you did is, to me, a big discrimination itself too… Of course I know what you mean, but in the end, to me, sounds harsh… For the rest nice pov, thank You.. it is really a hard time sometimes, even with me, that I consider “average advanced”spiritually XD, the thought of suicide comes in mind as a solution, and everytime at the end I know it doesn’t work..the biggest help is , as always, go within.. and maybe a hug.. yes

    Much love to You all pleiadians
    M.

    Reply
    1. Klaudia

      Thx Matteo, I not only agree with “a big discrimination itself too” I even believe THAT was intentionally… only I’ve got no clue why.

      Reply
        1. Matteo Brustolon

          Indeed I consider myself one of the most powerful creature in the Universe :D.. and that’s always what makes me go on and on and on in a world of misunderstanding. Love and consideration for ourselves is so important

          Reply
      1. Matteo Brustolon

        Who knows.. and if this was just a smart trick to trigger this answer from me… and then from You? A big hug Klaudia!
        Love from Italy
        Matteo

        Reply
  5. Starseed Life

    I left CA and moved to CO. It’s very much Discrimination Land and the darkest place I’ve ever been. Eternally grateful to the Universe for the incoming consequences and repercussions that “Flip the Hourglass” and restore the Balance.

    Reply
  6. ttutone

    I honestly thought we have evolved past discrimination. I do not connect with ‘Tunia’s message and it does almost seem to bring some dark meaning or agenda. I may have read it wrong but it didn’t vibe with me. Just my humble opinion.

    Reply
    1. John R

      All of these problems/traumas always and ever happen in the cabal dominated Euro, Can/US/Aus zones and orher places that historically mimic them or are affected by this (utterly hapless) demonic ‘ideology’.

      Step outside this self righteous left brained worshipping ‘maelstrom’ and you will even now find that people are just literally people getting along regardless of skin colour/race/religion.

      If you happen to need a plumber there is always someone you can find. Same with a builder, healer, guide, incence maker, etc, ad infinitum. Or become one of the above without fanfare, posturing, finger pointing and other ‘do gooder’ traits that always divide and never bring peace.

      Reply
  7. Diamond Lil

    How odd that Tunia has based her entire message on msm agenda bwain washings. That means she, too, is suggestible enough to have become bwain washed, about what she sees on msm tv, from her spaceship! Wow! I just don’t believe the bulk of humanity is that dumb or hateful-just disempowered and voiceless.

    Reply
    1. the_complaint_department

      Sorry, I don’t see it and I resent the implications. Can you back up your claim objectively? Thanks.

      Reply
      1. Mrs. Graham

        You don’t see it?

        Here’s the thing- look at predominantly white countries like Norway or Scotland or what the United States USED to be. Look at the marvelous structures we built. Look at the safe, clean, advanced societies white people created. Look at how we thrived for a very long time because all of the people who lived in those predominantly white societies all had high IQ’s, read a lot of books, and worked extremely hard to build themselves amazing countries to live in. We don’t throw trash everywhere. We didn’t sleep on the street. We didn’t rob each other.

        Now look at Africa. Africa, TO THIS DAY, resents that white people came to them and helped them get clean drinking water (because it makes them look bad that they couldn’t do it for themselves I guess). Black Africans literally murdered all the white farmers, took their land, then too late, realized they didn’t know how to farm (and they’d murdered all the people who did) so they suffered a famine of epic proportions.

        Mainstream media talking points say, “Love these people. Accept them into your country. They just want a better opportunity.”

        What they are REALLY saying is, “Let that person break into your house and steal the food and nice clothing you worked so hard to buy for yourself. They just want a better life. TOLERATE THIS.”

        America is now importing third-world refugees into our country who A. Don’t speak our language. B. Are murdering our women and children and police officers and blaming a “language barrier” as the reason why they did it. C. Are claiming thousands of dollars per month in free money and getting free housing. And D. Are enjoying all of this on WHITE TAXPAYER DIMES, while we have HOMELESS VETERANS. ON THE STREET.

        All of the predominantly white countries who have imported the third world now find themselves up to their eyeballs in mass-stabbings, rapes, and trash all over their city. Why?

        Because people who were raised in the Third World just take whatever they want instead of being polite and working their way for it the way predominantly white societies have.

        It’s not about the skin color. It’s about the culture. Notice that there are also huge swaths of Muslims immigrating into the US and now telling white suburban homeowners that they are offended by us having dogs, so please keep our dogs away from them. Excuse me? You move into OUR country and have the audacity to change the way WE live?

        Do I have sympathy that there are war-torn refugees whose homes are ruined? Absolutely. Do I understand that we should help those people? Sure. Let’s help them rebuild THEIR OWN COUNTRIES.

        But remember what I said about Zimbabwe’s black residents murdering all the white farmers just to take what they had, and then starving themselves in the process. Look it up.

        You can’t reason with a person who can’t understand why just taking what others built is wrong.

        Last, when just 15% of the population (the black population in America) commits 50% of the crime, it’s getting awfully hard to say “The law is kinder to white people.” No, the law is kind to RICH people. A white man steps in and chokes out a madman threatening women on a subway, and gets convicted of manslaughter. A black man does THE EXACT SAME THING MONTHS LATER, and gets no jail time. And what’s messed up is that I can’t even find the second story anymore. All you hear about is the white guy who did it.

        Did you hear about the immigrant who murdered a cop in NYC, got away clean, and then flipped off the news cameras as he walked away without jail time?

        The law is currently skewed against WHITES.

        Black people can commit all the crime in the world and then still cry victim when they are prosecuted for it. Meanwhile white men will go to jail for 2 or 3x the time a black man will for the same crimes right now. And that’s being done in the name of fAiRnEsS.

        Am I saying white people are best? Nope. Am I white supremacist? Nope. Am I, however, a student of history, and know that all the cathedrals in predominantly white countries like Scotland and England and Norway were built by genius white minds? Yes.

        White people evolved to live in cold climates which means we build magnificent buildings to live in and live inside half the year reading books and getting smarter. We are overwhelmingly kind, patient, and courteous people who put other people ahead of ourselves. Which means that quality in us is being exploited to tolerate things like migrants being bussed into our cities and murdering our children. LAKEN RILEY FOR EXAMPLE.

        I hope this answers your question.

        Reply
        1. the_complaint_department

          I see… Well, I believe ‘white people’ were not exactly helping poor third world countries get clean drinking water or teaching them how to farm in the past few centuries: it’s not really something I gathered from MSM topics or history books from high IQ people, but merely from observing the shadows (unacknowledged unconscious behaviors) of their culture at the individual level. It’s not as pretty as their architecture.

          If that was DL’s point, I think Tunia was only making an analogy with black/white polarization to make the MSM men/women polarization’s incoherence more visible. Either way, thank you for your overwhelmingly kind, patient, and courteous response to a poor thirsty third world country man.

          Reply
          1. Mrs. Graham

            Respectfully….You really, truly don’t believe white people have helped third world nations get clean water or teach them how to farm for the past few centuries?

            What exactly do you think white people got labeled “colonizers” for?

            For dropping by Africa for vacations?

            Or is it because white people have overwhelmingly, over and over, and over, and over, tried to help more impoverished nations…

            and still get crapped on for it?

            Look up what a Kenyan politician said about Mr. Beast, who recently brought many impoverished Africans clean water. Hint: he wasn’t happy.

            “It perpetuated the stereotype that Africa is ‘dependent on handouts”

            So even when we DO help the less fortunate, they are somehow upset about it anyway.

            I’m also well-aware that some rich buttheads pillaged parts of Africa for resources, but white people as a whole did not do that. A handful of rich jerks did. Another topic for another day.

            All that being said, white people are overwhelmingly Christian. We treat others as we wish to be treated. We were taught right from wrong as children. There’s a reason rich white people take missions to Africa to try and teach them about Jesus’s lessons. There’s a reason why 95% of the money that gets sent to poor, impoverished nations by Christian charities comes from CHRISTIAN WHITE PEOPLE.

            If you’re just “observing from the shadows” the reason why you don’t know more about the amazing, philanthropic work that white people do it’s because the mainstream media- and web searches like Google- do their best to hide that information to make the casual “observer” think that white people are just white supremacist monsters.

            We aren’t.

            And as long as “Tunia” refuses to acknowledge the fact that America (a country my direct ancestor helped found, FYI) is currently being invaded by migrants who contribute NOTHING, and who are running around this country stabbing and raping white women… I think it’s safe to say “Tunia” has an agenda. Look to what that is. Realize what the problem is.

            The state of Maine in the USA has the highest percentage of white people.

            The state of Maine also has the lowest crime.

            Maybe the two aren’t related, but it sure paints a picture, doesn’t it?

            Good day.

          2. the_complaint_department

            Actually, I merely believe Tunia never ever posed a challenge to your perspective – I could, but there is no point for me in pursuing further dissent.

            So I concede that your motivation for the entire replies to me is just as pure as were the intents of white colonists in third world countries, your ancestors, and missionaries teaching about Jesus. Rejoice! Be proud! Thanks for your help!

        2. Lara

          As a white South African, I agree with much of what you say, Mrs. Graham. Well done for saying it.

          Reply
          1. Mrs. Graham

            Thank you.

            It really isn’t about skin color. We’re more intelligent than that.

            It’s about behavior.

            In America, large stores are being shuttered because black people loot them every single week without consequence. You don’t see white people looting stores.

            It’s a problem.

            Take care.

  8. Arthur

    PS
    I wanted to ask Tunisia, A.S. or anyone who knows: What Is the vague story with Kate Middleton? I haven’t even come across any explanations for what’s happening in any of the channeling information.

    Reply
      1. Arthur

        It depends on what the situation revolves around.
        Recently, more and more information has been appearing from cloned bots. And that clones are replacing more and more famous people who are simply killed.
        There are strong suspicions that she was killed, and events developed rapidly, so that her clone was not ready. That’s why they’re pulling. It takes at least 5 months to quickly grow a clone.

        Reply
  9. Collin

    Hi Tunia. Thank you for caring about men. In response to this post I wish to offer my own metaphor:

    Imagine a place called “Either/Or Land”. In this place, a person can either choose one side or the other in any situation they encounter. They are not allowed to choose both sides, and they are not allowed to pick a middle spot.

    In “Either/Or Land”, you either choose to be for women’s rights or for the patriarchy. No middle position is allowed. You choose to be for Israel or for Palestine, with no other alternative. You choose to be for Black Lives Matter or you choose to be a white supremacist. You choose Capitalism or Socialism. You choose Republican or Democrat. You choose work or welfare, etc.

    In “Either/Or Land”, when you make your choice that choice is final and it automatically means those who chose the other option are your enemy. Everything is seen as black and white.

    In “Either/Or Land”, real intelligent debates are not allowed. You either choose one side or the other, and if you have to back up your decision with logic that doesn’t make sense then that is perfectly acceptable so long as you wholly choose one side and view the other side as your enemy. In “Either/Or Land” science and religion can mean whatever you want them to mean.

    If “Either/Or Land” sounds familiar, well it should because that place is Earth. I think that is why we see women hating men (and vice versa), white people hating black people (and vice versa), Republicans hating Democrats (and vice versa), Israelis hating Palestinians (and vice versa), etc. That is why we see whacky science (and religion), nonsensical debates, broad-spectrum hatred, and “us or them” belief structures.

    I believe the dark controllers intentionally set up Earth society in this way to keep people perpetually fighting with each other. If this doesn’t change, then I don’t see how anything on Earth changes.

    Keep up the good fight.

    Peace.

    Reply
  10. Nameless

    When will there be a society free of discrimination and fair?
    There are spiritual people who talk about the lesson of karma, but haven’t those who discriminate experienced the lesson of karma until now? Channeling spiritualists, what do you think about karma?

    Reply
    1. the_complaint_department

      I guess that to depend on society or ‘discriminating others’ to experience freedom and fairness is a karma in itself, and it’s overcome individually first.

      Reply
  11. scotth9510

    I think if white people would stop feeling so insecure about themselves and look at blacks Asians Hispanics etc as being human though looking differently from white people that would help a lot.

    Reply
    1. Mrs. Graham

      1. Look at Japan. They have the safest, cleanest cities in the world. I have huge respect for Asian cultures.
      2. I promise, it’s not insecurity. We are watching invading migrants from Mexico and Africa tear our cities apart and rape our women and murder our children.
      3. Why do you tolerate this?

      Reply
      1. Raksha

        I lived in Japan for a year and half. It is indeed very clean and very safe. It is a very homogenous society, both culturally and economically. However it psychologically a very harsh society to live in. Their violence is introjected. This is also the country with the highest suicide rate, I believe.

        About the rest of your argument, I don’t remember the exact statistics but in France and Germany, most of the crimes are indeed committed by migrants. A hard truth to swallow for many. They never asked the people about their immigration policies.

        In the US, the Biden administration is clearly importing voters by handling them money, house etc. They don’t care about the consequences.

        I disagree with you about colonisation though, that clearly impaired the colonized countries to reach their own advancement.

        Reply
        1. Mrs. Graham

          On your last point, you could be right- akin to assisting a butterfly getting out of the cocoon. But if after two thousand years Africans didn’t even figure out chairs or clean water until white “colonizers” came to show them how… Are we supposed to just stand by and wait for them to all starve to death before doing something?

          I suppose just staying out of their business could be an approach… but look at the other comments saying white people did nothing for African or minority countries.

          We can’t win either way, it seems.

          Reply
          1. Raksha

            I don’t think that colonisation was pursued out of empathy.

            It was a course between the powers of the time, to seize control of assets. There may have been some positive collaterals, but when the europeans left, they could never get over it in the end. There is this “Cargo concept” that illustrates that suddenly improving a “primitive society” engenders some difficulties on the long run and is counter-productive. Now, many African countries have all the bad sides of western societies, without the quality of life. And they lost the opportunity to create their own way.

            Also, North Africa was a bright society in the past, astronomy, mathematics, poetry etc.

            But we agree that the immigritation politics of the globalist is nonsense, or rather, it is made on purpose for nefarious ends.

        2. John R

          When the colonists retreated after “Independence” parade, the once colonised country was ‘gifted’ with the cabal influence behind the scenes in its government. This ensured the “freed” country would never return to its oh so “uncivilised ways” and would subconsciously be in indebted to its (historical) ‘overlords’.

          Reply
      2. scotth9510

        I don’t tolerate it but I can’t do anything about it either. Why not ask pResident biden and his band of dim-witted cronies why they ain’t doing anything. Don’t worry in November there’ll be a adult in charge and I’d suggest you stock up on kleenex.

        Reply
  12. Arthur

    “But don’t treat the entire group harshly just because that group as a whole is allegedly more likely to do bad things.”

    I don’t agree here. The statement about probability is correct.
    And practice proves this. These groups have a collective consciousness. They are in their development at the level of collective insects. They always act in national clans, diasporas, like a crowd of gangs.Their perception of themselves comes through “WE, not “I.”” There is no individuality. They become zombies very easily, there is no personal thinking.

    Reply
    1. the_complaint_department

      Good point, but I believe you’re overlooking the fact that there are two distinct moments in ‘development’ when this bundling in group occurs: one prior to the attaining of real individual self-awareness, choice and responsibility and one that occurs later; and whether it’s functional/beneficial or not to belong to a group is entirely a matter of reaching individual awareness.

      Being a zombie is more like having a collective UNconsciousness, it is not really pleasant. As an individual you can’t really objectively “treat the entire group harshly” as Tunia implies, all you can do is choose to look at a person up close and spot the eventual hypocrisy of one who chooses ‘WE’ or ‘I’ for different purposes.

      Reply
  13. Modern society is a joke and not a funny one either

    Women can engage easily in multiple promiscuous encounters or affairs without reprecursion or backlash and often guys get slim picking or first opportunities that arise. It’s really common to see guys go many years without any relationships or their whole lives as virgins. And the economy is not providing well with stability of independence, self sufficiency and abundance for others to provide for themselves let alone others so the family rate has gone down. Why you see so many living with their parents still and unable to buy housing, tied to rent or caught up with bills and other debts strangling their freedom of choices and activities (including future opportunities). If people were to be happier in co companionship, people need to have less promiscuous tendencies and learn to respect and attain mutual devotance. Often it’s hookup culture, hit it and quit it, have sexual affairs without care for responsibility of long term reprecursions. If people were financially stable, loved eachother more developedly and in co communion, they would be wise as to their responsibilities and raising a family and not fear those things such as pregnancy. That and lack of self acceptance, if they have someone who genuinely loves and supports them and have acknowledgement of their importance and significance to others in their environment. There’s a lot of reasons why people would feel disconnected or estranged, ostracized. If society wanted to build better it would start at the heart of economy, providing for families, breaking up monopolies or ownership of land (which never belonged to them genuinely, just a contract thing towards peers and measure of corrupt greed, it belonged to the earth and its inhabitants equally and natives were stolen and killed of their hunting grounds). I’m sure most people in America aren’t even true descendants of those who once inhabited here, which is even sadder. But many might still have past lives and soul memories or experiences, with relation to the landscape and earth around them.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to ArthurCancel reply