Channel: A.S.
Note from the channeler: apparently one common Pleiadian greeting is just standing in front of each other and looking into each other’s eyes. That way, it’s easy to read the other person’s mind and energy, and be read by them.
Pleiadians have learned that some Earth humans think this is a bit weird or intense. Although in their defense, it’s less creepy when the person doing it radiates love and calm.
From their perspective, it is weird that we immediately start talking to each other and not take a moment of time to observe the new person’s energy, and give them a chance to observe ours.
So if you have had a dream or vision with a Pleiadian just calmly looking at you and not saying anything, well, that is one common greeting in their culture.
On to Hakann’s message.
My dearest brothers and sisters,
This is Hakann speaking. I greet you in peace and love.
In your world, the concept of an ingroup and an outgroup is well-known. The idea here is that your ingroup are people who belong to your metaphorical tribe, and you are willing to help them. And your outgroup are people who don’t belong to your metaphorical tribe, and they are potential enemies and you certainly don’t need to go out of your way to help them.
Today, I would like to expand on that idea a bit.
In reality, it’s not so black and white that people perceive others as either the ingroup or the outgroup. Instead, most people assign different levels of humanity to different people.
People often assign full humanity to people in their ingroup. So for an individual right-winger, this could be other right-wingers. Some right-winger will assign full humanity to a black gay right-winger, while other right-wingers will not assign full humanity to a black gay right-winger.
Then there are people who are assigned a large amount of humanity, but not full humanity. So some right-wingers will merely assign a large amount of humanity to a black gay right-winger, but not full humanity. Also, a right-winger might assign a large amount of humanity, but not full humanity to a moderate left-winger.
Then there are people who are assigned a small amount of humanity. A right-winger might assign only a small amount of humanity to an activist left-winger who intentionally blocks traffic to protest climate change, for example.
And a right-winger might assign zero humanity to for example a terrorist who wants to kill large numbers of Americans.
Note that this depends on the person. An individual right-winger might assign different levels of humanity to different groups than what I just listed.
Different right-wingers might also assign quite different levels of humanity to illegal immigrants. And yes, I do think that some right-wingers assign less humanity to illegal immigrants than I personally would like.
How someone thinks people in certain groups should be treated often depends on how much humanity they assign to those groups.
So for example, an individual right-winger might be fine with a terrorist being tortured for information.
The individual right-winger may not think that an activist left-winger who blocks traffic should be tortured, but they may be fine with them being treated roughly by police and maybe getting some bruises in the process.
The individual right-winger might think that a moderate left-winger doesn’t deserve to be treated roughly by police. But then again, the individual right-winger might not be willing to altruistically help a moderate left-winger with car trouble.
And the individual right-winger may be willing to altruistically help another right-winger with car trouble.
Again, these are just examples of how one individual right-winger might look at things.
Hopefully you get the underlying point: different people assign different levels of humanity to groups of other people, and consequently treat them differently and are okay with different kinds of treatments for those people.
The exact same thing goes for the left. They, too, assign different levels of humanity to different groups, and consequently are fine with certain people and groups being treated in ways that they wouldn’t tolerate in other cases.
For example, if New York city was on the Southern border, then the left would suddenly be more concerned with illegal immigration. Because then people they assign full humanity to, New Yorkers, are in trouble and not just people that the left assigns less humanity to, namely Texans.
Or as another example: many people on the left are mostly fine with Trump being convicted in a quite unfair trial, even in the context where other people aren’t being dragged in front of a court. Why is the left fine with this? That’s because many left-wingers assign little humanity to Trump.
However, imagine if this situation had happened the other way around, four years ago. So imagine that Trump was still president and imagine that Biden, and only Biden, gets dragged in front of a court and unfairly convicted while being a presidential candidate. Democrats wouldn’t have tolerated that at all. Why? Because left-wingers assign full humanity to Biden, but not to Trump.
The right loves to accuse the left of not having principles, but I think it’s more accurate to say that the left doesn’t assign a lot of humanity to Trump and to Trump supporters. That’s why they’re fine with things like the Trump trial.
This isn’t exclusive to the left. The right also often doesn’t extend their principles to people whom they don’t assign a lot of humanity to. Hence the right might be fine with terrorists being tortured, or with Israel committing an in my opinion genocide against Palestinians. Why? Because some people on the right assign far more humanity to Israelis than to Palestinians.
If someone is fine with someone else being treated unfairly, then I wouldn’t start out by thinking that they’re either uninformed about the injustice, or that they’re hypocritical, or that they lack principles. I would start out by wondering: just how much humanity is this person assigning to the people who are being mistreated?
After all, the vast majority of people are fine if people whom they don’t assign a lot of humanity to, are mistreated. This is also why groups of perfectly fine people on your world suddenly seem to turn into genocide-supporting monsters if a group is dehumanized enough.
Hence, dehumanizing language and dehumanizing propaganda and dehumanizing news is a very good predictor of that group being treated poorly. In fact it’s well-known on your world that dehumanization is one step towards genocide.
Now I’m absolutely not saying that right-wingers in America are being or are going to get genocided. I am just saying that it’s less about principles and more about degrees of humanity that are being assigned to groups. And that if you dehumanize a certain group, then otherwise perfectly normal people will suddenly think it’s fine if the now-dehumanized group gets treated poorly.
This also means that if news networks and prominent people consistently speak in dehumanizing or quasi-dehumanizing terms about certain groups of people, then that can create an environment where people are fine with that group being mistreated. This is something that both the left and the right should be careful about.
Labels are unfortunately effective at this. If someone says “Tom should be censored” then most people would disagree. But if someone says “Tom is a far-right extremist, he should be censored” then many people suddenly agree, even if Tom isn’t actually a far-right extremist in the first place. Such is the power of labels.
Political debate in the US is often so fruitless and frustrating because left and right assign different levels of humanity to different groups. For example, the right generally assigns less humanity to illegal immigrants than the left does, which contributes to the left accusing the right of being racists.
And the left often assigns less humanity to Trump supporters than Trump supporters assign to average left-wingers, because Trump supporters think that left-wingers are “still Americans after all.” This contributes to some people on the right seeing the left as crazy and out of control and unprincipled and amoral and hypocritical.
Often if there’s a political discussion that seems to go nowhere, the fundamental problem is that the left and right assign different levels of humanity to the group in question.
And this isn’t only about the political left versus the political right. You also see this in, for example, the fact that the average American cares much more about the death of Americans than they care about the death of, let’s say, Iraqis. This is because many Americans don’t assign full humanity to Iraqis.
Similarly, lots of women don’t assign full humanity to average men, in large part because of past oppression and because some men still mistreat women. And that’s why more or less zero women are protesting against men receiving harsher sentences for the same crime than women do. Meanwhile millions of women would be marching in protest if courts consistently gave harsher sentences to women than to men for the same crime.
Of course, even if men are more violent, that doesn’t mean that it’s fair to give a harsher sentence to a man than to a woman for the same crime. But that is currently happening consistently.
So why aren’t women protesting against anti-male systemic discrimination in courts, while women would absolutely protest against anti-female systemic discrimination in courts?
As I said, it’s because lots of women don’t assign full humanity to average men.
Now, sure, women will assign full humanity to men they know and like. However, average unknown men are potential creeps, potential predators, potential harassers, potential racists, potential incels, potential Trump voters, et cetera. It’s to the point where some women apparently assign more humanity to a bear than to a man, saying they would rather meet a bear in the forest than meet a man.
On one hand, I have compassion for Earth women because indeed far too many women get assaulted by men.
On the other hand, the vast majority of men aren’t doing anything wrong, and they don’t deserve being subject to systemic discrimination and arguably being subject to collective punishment.
Imagine saying to an ethnic group of immigrants that all of them are considered to be suspicious until proven innocent because statistically they commit more crimes, and that’s why cops and courts and hiring processes are going to openly discriminate against them. Imagine saying to an ethnic group of immigrants that it was up to the good people in the group to correct the behavior of the bad ones, and that systemic discrimination against the entire group would continue so long as the bad apples in that group remained active. Everyone would see that as monstrously unfair and very counterproductive.
Similarly, treating men in this way is monstrously unfair and very counterproductive too.
So, what is the solution to people only assigning limited amounts of humanity to others?
It is: people should work on raising their own level of consciousness and meeting their own needs and dealing with their own fear and pain. As you do that, you might succeed at assigning more and more humanity to more and more people, and in time even include more and more people into your definition of “I.” You become a more civilized human being that way.
Ideally, assign full humanity to everyone, even if you feel economically or physically threatened by immigrants, or if you feel physically threatened by men, et cetera. And hence, ideally, speak up if people you dislike get systemically treated in a way that you wouldn’t tolerate if it happened to people who you do like.
Also, part of the solution is empathy. And part of the solution is listening to the other group of people. Because if groups listen to each other, then generally they will assign a higher level of humanity to each other afterwards, which means that they then think the other group needs to be treated at least reasonably well. So listening to each other matters, even if you completely disagree.
I hope this was helpful.
I love you and wish you a very good week.
Your star brother,
Hakann
If you are interested in local meetings with other people also seeking first contact with benevolent ETs, then please see https://eraoflight.com/2024/06/19/hakann-local-meetings-for-those-seeking-first-contact-with-benevolent-ets/ . If you search with control-F for @, then you can quickly find email addresses of those who are organizing local groups. It’s also not too late to post a new (secondary) email address yourself to start a new local group, because we plan to keep linking to that post for the foreseeable future.
For Era of Light
**Source
**These channelings are exclusively submitted to Eraoflight.com by the channeler. If you wish to share them elsewhere, please include a link back to the original post.
At this point, it’s not channeling. But entities. To the channeler, please get clean and clear for the clarity of the message. Entities instead of Pleiadians can speak through you if you are not careful. Have a SRT clearing, especially if you heavily consumed alcohol in the past. This will remove entities pretending to be Pleiadians.
I am sure that genuine concern for the channeller could find more loving venues of expression than veiled criticism on the comment section.
Just chatting, this is just my casual imagination. Maybe the Galactic Federation should arrest almost all the people on Earth. Ordinary people on Earth should not be arrested for guilt and be imprisoned, but rather for mental disorder and cognitive dissonance, and should be sent to mental hospital. Ordinary people on Earth should be informed that they actually don’t have the ability to cope with a super-large-scale society, because in such a society, the chain of evil is long enough, social responsibility is diluted enough, the Prisoner’s Dilemma is hidden enough, and technology is complex enough, so that in personal vision, people often feel that the society is just slightly off track, but in fact the situation is over. The train has turned 270° on a macro scale and will eventually hit itself. Therefore, people are arranged to live in small communities in mental sanatoriums to review and examine the dangers and absurdities of the old society. A small community where all members know each other, which ordinary people can handle. Then integrate multiple small communities or expand the community size.
The only problem is some patients often confuse glimpses of casual imagination with what they comprehend of what is already taking place.
There you go once again A.S. You ‘ol pot stirrer. What goes around, comes around, (now virtually instantly) regardless of I.Q.
I fear I must be in the minority of humans/starseeds who thinks that everything hakaan mentioned about how groups of people treat each other is wrong. It amazes me and saddens me how divisive people and I think most humans would be horrified at how petty there actions are. Sure we can say the archon dracos reptilian are the source no pun intended behind everything wrong with society. But humanity really needs to evolve and treat each other as equal regardless of anything else.
Forget labels for a moment, what about if people say, “Tom has censored Bob, he should be censored for that”, does that challenge your sense of justice a bit further? “Do unto others as you want done to you” is not preclusive of “Do unto others as they want done to them”
I agree that re-humanizing all that we unduly consider non-human is the way to go, and that your prescription for raising one’s own consciousness and having their needs met is the (only) path to that goal.
Even if everyone agreed with that on the surface level, the debate would only shift to what ARE human needs and how to prioritize meeting them; so until everyone is rid of their projections in that regard we are not adult enough as a species to discuss the next step!
Could Hakaan just tell us about the progress of the gray hats? Thats all we really care about at this point.
Things are way too messed up for anyone to take these things to heart.
I trusted this source. Now Im questioning it. These Pleiadians havent said anything useful in many months. Wheres R’Kok? At least he never gave us this fluffy bullshite.
If your trust on a source is conditional to your personal use for their input, all more the reason for taking these things to heart?
The gray hats sure didn’t.
His insight was very relatable due to our hybrid culture and I miss it too, but I can’t say I found it any less fluffy.
Please do tell us how much humanity we should assign to someone who is trying to rob us, Hakann.
Do lecture us more on how people who break into our house and steal our food and rape our women should be treated.
While I agree every human is deserving of love and respect and it’s their ACTIONS that make us judge them differently, I draw the line at letting this country get invaded and saying “We just need to love these people.” They already proved they’re criminals by not waiting in line and coming here legally (which requires an oath to the country). If they truly were a benefit to our country instead of literally an invader who has broken into our house, they’d ring the doorbell and ask to be let in rather than breaking a window.
It’s not America’s fault other third-world countries war with each other and can’t come together to build anything. It certainly isn’t our responsibility to pay for every single migrant who hops the fence and then gets free hotel rooms while we have homeless veterans in the street.
The VA has been caught paying for health benefits of illegal aliens. According to “Hakann” we should just keep doing that. Where is the love for the veterans who actually earned that healthcare benefit?
Let that sink in.
Where is the love for the people who ACTUALLY WORKED for the things that illegals are being given for free, Hakann?
“It’s not America’s fault other third-world countries war with each other and can’t come together to build anything.”
‘America’ probably has an ‘intel agency’ with that precise goal as it’s own statement of purpose. It’s called ‘defending American interests across the globe’.
So because that intel agency (a handful of thirty thousand or less people) are a cancer upon America, America’s citizens are at fault?
Because a handful of corrupt banker trillionaires keep America funding the endless wars through taxation and bomb other countries, it’s the citizens of America at fault, and we should just put up with violent migrants being dumped into our neighborhoods and collecting benefits OUR tax dollars paid for?
Because a certain tiny-hat wearing country who sucks away more “foreign aid” than any other country has taken over our political system, we should just love the invaders more?
“America” did not do this. That intel agency and that tiny-hat wearing country did this, and we shouldn’t put up with it. If all Americans came together instead of tolerating this drain on our resources and rooted out the real problem, we’d not have it anymore.
It has nothing to do with loving or not loving people. It has everything to do with those two specific groups of people trying to slowly destroy everything beautiful and demoralize us as a country by welcoming invaders into a country they did not build.
Tiny hat wearing country! 🤣
You are hysterical Mrs. Graham
Yes, the cancer is a problem you should address before the infection or who you plan on suing. Thanks for the analogy.
Awareness is ramping up of the problem. I have faith our military will deal with it swiftly.
The tiny hat wearing country is responsible for forcing the immigration into us to try to destroy us. It definitely won’t work.
That being said, sure sick of these “pleiadians” echoing leftwing corrupt media talking points. It’s almost like there’s plants here trying to force us to accept the unacceptable.
Unconditional love is great, but unconditional love is what makes a woman whose child was murdered by someone forgive that someone (to combat racism), and then that someone comes back to murder the mother, too.
Not having it anymore.
“Faith in the military” is allowing the cancer to spread. For decades. They have proof, they have an oath & they ain’t honoring these.
“These pleiadeans” indeed brought us these sad news, but the notion that unconditional love or forgiveness or ‘attributing humanity’ to people precludes the need to arrest or kill them them is entirely in your head.
Only cowards dehumanize their targets.
For my next trick, I’m going to channel a volunteer from the audience. Ahem…
“I never said channeling isn’t real Word Vomit, I just questioned certain people’s capacity to do it. Clearly A.S. has imbued his own political leftism in most of his posts, and we have yet to see a channeling where he doesn’t yap about his own personal sexual frustrations.
And you keep acting like you know everyone inside out for your own amusement, but you don’t have a clue of what you’re talking about, perhaps you are channeling your own ass? Even now you find a way to make this about yourself!
All in this website are tired of watching you take any subject and turn it into an excuse to talk about your dim-witted psychology. In your pompous word salad ramblings, everyone is projecting their egos except for you – the God of Humility…
Why don’t you get a life, you pathetic excuse for a human being?”
(…) Well, sorry about that. Guess I ran into some interference? I’ll stick with my day job for now. Cheers.
Very good Word Vomit! I wasn’t going to post anything, but you clearly are still hurt. I’m sorry I hurt your feelings. Please, go back to your word vomits without any criticism from me. I almost miss your excrementitious, inane babbling.
Please post away, I know the comments section of EOL is all you have….I’m not so cruel to want you to miss a chance to prove your spiritual superiority.
Love and light, Word Vomit.
I strongly dislike having so many illegals in our country but I don’t want anyone to be mistreated.
I want the immigrants to have a good life.
IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY!!!
I need much better treatment amen.
We should assign full humanity to white straight men and help them have a better life.
Amen
Did people watch the Trump Biden debate?
I hope everyone could see that Biden was lying incessantly.
I agree the billionaires and corporations need to pay their share.
I disagreed with everything else he said.
Amen
More Tunia stories and good news about how everyone’s helping us more now.
Amen
With no judgement to the attitude whatsoever; in a vibratory-law-of-attraction context it might delay the kind of contact you possibly expect from outworlders.
Afterall, there certainly are Pleiadians who believe earth humans should have a good life IN THEIR OWN PLANET!!!
Have you seen the video of the Sub-Saharan African in England telling the English people he will put their baby in the microwave unless he gets money?
I don’t think the English people want him in England anymore than the Pleiadeans would want him in the Pleiadeas.
I hope the Pleiadeans don’t succumb to Jewish name calling like European countries have.
Racial differences are real. I don’t belong in the Pleiadeas anymore than a savage African licking a chef knife belongs in England.
Just how much humanity am I to assign such a low IQ violent beast just because he walks on 2 legs?
Can racial similarity get any more proximal than a direct blood relationship? Screw the news and statistics, how much humanity would you assign yourself and your own parents?
It’s a lot easier to assign high degrees of humanity once we admit this standard is currently not worth that much on Earth and that we should all work to raise the bar collectively.
How about Full Humanity for Everyone, and for Everything to Blossom and Bloom as God/Spirit intends !! That was not so shocking now was it?!
Valid point TCD. The world and Universe gets “smaller” every passing day.
Jared, we have illegals in our country because JEWS run our country. They control the financial system. Fake money is their weapon, their means of warfare.
Jews have weaponized immigration to subsume Europe and America.