Channel: A.S.
My dearest brothers and sisters,
This is Tunia speaking. I love you so very much.
From my perspective, most Earth people underestimate how wise and smart and perceptive children can be. After all, anyone who has had children will notice that sometimes they make very sharp observations that cut to the heart of the matter.
I think Earth children are too often treated condescendingly and like they’re dumb. Now sure, it’s not good to literally treat a child like you would treat an adult. Children obviously do have less developed brains than adults do.
Still, consider for example baby talk (saying “gooh gooh gah gah”). Baby talk doesn’t actually help the baby learn your language. It’s much better to just talk to them normally, as you would talk to an adult. They will learn much more from that than from baby talk.
Furthermore, it’s better for babies psychologically if you talk to them like they’re sort of an equal, rather than talking to them like they’re a moron. Which is more or less what someone is doing when they engage in baby talk.
While children are different, some children are also able to engage with far more complex material than you might realize is possible. The recommended and normal types of material and books that you let children interact with at a given age is almost like a lowest common denominator. Some children can engage with substantially more complex material than that, at least in some specific fields. So don’t just give them the so-called age-appropriate stuff, but also let them briefly try out or study various more complex things, and see if they can pick it up or if they enjoy it.
This is especially true for the often high-vibration and talented children that are coming in now.
Of course, your education system needs drastic reform.
One point here is that it can be profoundly damaging to a child to force him or her to sit still in a classroom and only give them work that is too easy for them.
Another point is that children should be much more free to explore various things and then to spend a substantial amount of time on things that they’re actually interested in, rather than forcing them to learn a standard school curriculum.
Furthermore, children are often very well in tune with their bodies, in tune with subtle energies and in tune with non-physical beings. They’re typically much better at this than their parents are — but then tragically, school and parents typically train them to only focus on physical matter, and to live by the clock.
How amazing would it be if children were given a brief lesson on energy healing during their childhoods? Many children can pick that up more quickly than adults can.
So, my hope is that on New Earth: children are respected more, are given more freedom than they currently have and are given more opportunities to learn and explore things, including advanced and spiritual topics.
And one important step towards that is for adults to realize that children can actually be quite smart, wise and spiritually capable. And that it’s good to briefly let them look at material that an average Earth adult might consider to be too complex at that age. Some of the material might indeed be too complex, but who knows, maybe the child is talented in a specific field and they can delve into relatively advanced material quite quickly.
With all my love and respect,
Your star sister,
Tunia
** Source
** These messages are exclusively submitted to Eraoflight.com by the channeler. If you wish to share them elsewhere, please include a link back to the original post
If you want to meet like-minded Earth humans, please see https://eraoflight.com/2024/06/19/hakann-local-meetings-for-those-seeking-first-contact-with-benevolent-ets/
If you want to learn about a useful healing modality, please see https://eraoflight.com/2025/01/11/hakann-onion-healing/
Totally agree
Thank you
Love
Mt
Thanks to Tunia for the reasonable suggestion, this topic reminds me of something related.
I think the Internet and personal smart devices need a more sophisticated rating system, and it’s obvious that children and teenagers should not be able to access the entire Internet. But I mainly want to point out that the general rating system is imperfect only up to “18+”, even for pornographic content. In addition, it’s obvious that some adults and even the elderly today are still not mentally mature enough to deal well with the complex situations of human society, which is partly due to the manipulation from black hats and gray hats, deliberately keeping the people ignorant and naive. In theory, there should be levels like “24+”, “36+”, and “50+” above “18+”, which is easy to understand when life expectancy is greatly extended, and the degree of retention of past life experience can also be calculated as part of age. And “50+” can be the highest level, which may involve some content such as how to make a deal with real demons, how to develop evil moderately, and how to transform and play with human nature and social ethics. Of course, some content can only be provided to very professional and senior people, and cannot be opened to the public, the public can only have a basic understanding of the degree of concealment.
I’m sorry but that sounds awful. Prescribing limits for what kind of information should be available to whom is not aligned with principles of a free society.
I understand your concern with ‘protection’, but it’s under that guise that most unjust dictatorial governances have thrived upon the world for millennia, censoring all information that could threaten the ‘power’ of our ‘protectors’ over us.
Offering responsibility for what you learn – for whatever knowledge, at whatever age – seems like a far more natural attitude. We have developed an artificial fear of knowledge because irresponsible galactic races have unknowingly replicated their weaknesses in our society.
Despite their efforts, the ultimate technology is based in love – a concept beyond their grasp – and therefore cannot be used in a ultimately harmful way. They are very very clever though, dominated by AI, and will use whatever means possible to induce collective submission and perversion to suit their empty goals.
You may not agree with everything I’m going to say, but part of what I mean is that, if you compare some very professional confidential information to a book, the “50+” of the public may not know the specific contents of the book, but they should know the table of contents of the book. The “50+” of the public should know what types and how much information is concealed. This is similar to my attitude towards technology control. As long as the corresponding level of awareness is reached, the corresponding technology can be mastered. If everyone in society is comprehensively and fully developed, then everyone can access all the information in the social information library, that’s good.
The problem and the danger remain : who gets to decide for others what is appropriate, or just ? Who gets to decide if one has the proper level of consciousness ? I don’t want to live in such a society.
Also, the implication of your message seems to be that bodily age equals wisdom.
While age can certainly contribute to psychological maturity, I would be cautious about making such a rigid correlation.
The model you propose also implies a form of victim-consciousness — the idea that certain experts or so-called wise individuals should decide what is best for the herd.
In higher densities, it’s true that wise beings may have a broader perspective and valuable insights to offer the collective.
However, you mentioned that in a fully developed society, such restrictions would no longer be necessary.
Therefore, your proposal may only serve to consolidate more power in the hands of individuals who are not necessarily of high consciousness, while infantilizing the rest of the population.
I would also add that in our current situation, plenty of information is available — but unless it’s endorsed by the mainstream, many people simply don’t care.
In that sense, free will is already being fully respected.
So why would you want to restrict access to information even further?
And I’m really not trying to pick on you, not at all. It’s just that you brought up some interesting topics.
Porn should be banned for minors though, but in France at last, you just have to click “I am over 18”. Most of all, parents should be more responsible. But responsability or consciousness is not something that you can force by law. But then, today, a woman was arrested in UK by the police because she confiscated the Ipads of her daugthers… So… more repression is not the way.
First off, thank you for indulging this debate.
The thing is I believe that what you describe is already in place, except there is no need for an entity to enforce it. The ‘book’ with all the knowledge and power in the universe is the universe itself: it’s not ‘secretive’ in nature, we are actually only limited by our ability to ‘read’ it. And it’s not an ability I would so directly correlate with ‘soul age’, ‘awareness’ or ‘consciousness’ , however you choose to measure it. You could say that Source or Nature enforces it through perfect Laws: to understand them, abide and enforce them is ultimately the same thing.
Obviously we have specific situations in mind when considering these topics, such as whether our spiritual advance has ever been in true correlation to the knowledge we possessed – but even those apparent disparities can be explained within the context of those same Laws, if we have the spirit to ask the right questions.
There are various reasons for this. First, informations about the specific implementation principles of some black magics and advanced weapons obviously need to be restricted. Some professional knowledge that is not dangerous in itself may not be suitable for ordinary people to obtain directly, because it’s not good or even safe to skip the understanding or experience of certain intermediate links or peripheral factors and directly obtain certain target information. In addition, before a person obtains certain information or experience, it’s better to have a more balanced knowledge background and more balanced and richer social experience, which is part of the origin of age restrictions. Age restrictions are about easy-to-operate, high-probability reliable security boundaries, so standard age boundaries are involved when restricting certain information, but they are not involved, or should not be involved, when promoting the dissemination of general information. Age restrictions are not a completely ideal method. When set reasonably, they are just very simple and high-probability appropriate, so people may be more concerned about other really serious social problems.
Besides，I’m simply expressing this: of course, society needs to make efforts to bridge the gap in consciousness and intelligence among its members, but if this gap is a fact that already exists, ordinary people usually have the ability and self-knowledge to identify a group that is better than the average. If individual differences are obvious and this identification is effective, then it’s better to allow better people to obtain appropriately larger management rights than to let everyone vote fairly on many things. The appropriateness here requires the society to test, even a very conservative attempt is more optimized and cost-effective than simple referendums.
Absolutely, if making this identification was as easy and straightforward for ordinary people as you say, we could have an utopian society right now.
But I don’t see how we are not ALREADY testing your proposition as it is, and it doesn’t seem to be working so well: ‘free societies’ supposedly elected these people who hold information privileges and power that they freely choose not to share due to ‘national security’ concerns.
Would you really believe and be satisfied if they told you: “Oh, there is a simple way to generate free clean energy cheaply; but we can’t trust you or the public not to build bombs with it” ?
It’s quite reasonable to believe in that, what is not okay – and I’m just pointing it out – is failing to acknowledge that it is already happening, quite obviously so – and it’s probably not a coincidence.
To add my personal opinion: collectively and individually, we already have more than enough power and knowledge to elegantly deliver a much more satisfying version of society than we currently have, and adding more before certain progresses are made would be counter-productive in that sense.
A message to Tunia. I would like you to tell me about the current trend of allowing a marriage system where men and women can have multiple spouses and the abolition of the marriage system in social systems, next time or in the future. Is this trend mainly related to the acceleration of the Earth’s ascension process or the interaction of the Earth’s ascension? Is it related to the acceleration of the Age of Aquarius or the Age of Air? If this social system is accepted, will the standards of spiritual law change? Will such a society actually work on Earth? How many people will be decent in a free sex society and how many will fall into the hell of lust? I would like you to talk about what kind of society would be best to prevent people from falling into the hell of lust in a free sex society from falling into the hell of lust. This is the first time we have seen such a trend in society on Earth, so if we fall into depravity and become Sodom and Gomorrah, it would be a case of putting the cart before the horse. Some people say that if we talk like this, humanity will become Sodom and Gomorrah. I would like you to talk about these things from the perspective of the Pleiadians. Thank you very much.
I agree. I think children are smarter than adults think. I don’t think adults understand children. I think we should educate children to bring out their potential, not suppress it.
Yes I hated school.
We should just let kids study what they’re interested in.
Amen