Channel: A.S.
My dearest brothers and sisters,
This is Hakann speaking. I greet you in peace and love.
You probably already know the principle that before you start arguing against someone, or before giving someone unsolicited advice, it’s good to first fully understand their perspective.
So if someone is doing or advocating for something that just seems completely illogical to you, then it’s good to try and understand their perspective better. After all, while obviously some perspectives aren’t very useful or accurate, usually there’s at least some kind of logic or some valid desire or some kernel of truth behind a perspective that other people hold.
And if you can’t find a way to take that other person’s kernel of truth or that desire on board, then it won’t be helpful to just think of their perspective as evil or stupid, and to try to steamroll them in a debate. Even if you win the debate, you will have probably hardened the position of the other person and increased division.
What’s not helpful to do, yet what happens unfortunately often, is to stereotype the other person’s position into an easy to attack strawman and then to attack that. Or to label the person themselves negatively, as for example a fascist or communist, attacking the person rather than the argument.
Okay, so what’s better is to first understand their perspective, and to have a nuanced view of the advantages and disadvantages of their perspective and of your perspective. After all, it’s rarely the case that your perspective is 100% perfect and the other person’s perspective is completely wrong.
I think you probably knew all of this already, at least on some level.
Now I would like to add something that may be new information:
Ideally, before you argue with someone or give them unsolicited advice, you don’t just try to understand their perspective in a nuanced and fair way. You also try to understand what life has been like for them, and how that could perhaps have shaped their views.
And you try to understand how your own views have been shaped by the life and experiences you have had.
If you don’t know the other person, you could share briefly how your life has been and how that has contributed to you having the views you currently hold. And you can ask them how their life has been and how that could perhaps have contributed to the views they currently hold, in their view.
After all, many people like to think that they simply hold the objectively correct view and others are wrong. And certainly, people are different, people have different souls and missions here on Earth, et cetera. Yet, it’s certainly also true that the life you have had has significantly impacted the views you currently hold.
In fact, if you think a certain person is wrong, well it’s possible that if you had led their life, then you would now have their worldview. That’s not always the case, but it certainly can be the case.
Because of that, it’s useful to understand the broad outlines of how a person’s life has been, before you start arguing against their position or giving them unsolicited advice.
If you understand their life, you might also learn if there have been any events that have been so impactful in their life that just arguing directly against their viewpoint will never convince them. But once you understand them, perhaps you can offer them alternative ways of meeting their needs, or perhaps you can suggest alternative ways to construct a society in which people do get their needs met.
For example, suppose someone grew up in crippling poverty, and has certain very specific, very strong political opinions as a result. Then if you learn this, you may realize that this person will never agree to any way of structuring society in which the poor aren’t helped — and indeed, wanting to help the poor is a noble desire. But in this case, perhaps you can have a productive discussion about what the most effective ways are of building a society in which everyone can have a good life — because there are several options here.
And if for example you grew up in a well-off family and don’t have “everyone should be able to have a good life” as a priority in your own mental construct of what an ideal society would be like, well, maybe you can reflect that if you had grown up in crippling poverty yourself, perhaps you would have different or at least slightly different opinions today.
The previous example discussed a situation where someone’s suffering was real, but perhaps their proposed societal solution wasn’t optimal. (Or perhaps it was.)
What can also be the case is that someone’s suffering is real, but they misidentified the cause of their suffering. In the best case, you might be able to change someone’s mind here, or at least plant seeds that will someday change someone’s mind — but you can’t make that argument without acknowledging that yes, they did have a very tough time. Because that is real.
Obviously these are just examples to illustrate how useful it can be to understand another person’s life in broad strokes, before you try to argue against them or give them unsolicited advice.
Sharing the broad outlines of your lives can also help create empathy and dismantle stereotypes.
Now, it’s possible that the other person will say that yes indeed, your views were shaped by the life you have had so far — but that they hold their own views because they’re smart and good people, and have decided to adopt the one ideology that is true and virtuous. In this case, it may be best to just not have an argument with them.
it’s also possible that the other person will demand understanding and empathy, but will not be willing to give you understanding or empathy. In this case, it may be best to just not have an argument with them. Even if you “win” the argument, the world probably will not be a better place afterwards, because you will only have hardened them in their position.
Unfortunately, productive arguments are rare, and sometimes the only winning move is to not have an argument at all.
As R’Kok said recently: Earth people are love-starved. So instead of arguing with them, you could also just listen to them and express love to them. If someone is unreasonable, showing them love can be very effective, if you have it in you.
Or you can of course just take a walk in nature, with the other person or by yourself, or you can meditate, et cetera.
I hope this helps.
I love and deeply respect you, and I hope to physically meet some of you later this year — it’s not guaranteed, it depends on the free-will choices that Earth humans make, but it is likely.
Your star brother,
Hakann
** Source
** These messages are exclusively submitted to Eraoflight.com by the channeler. If you wish to share them elsewhere, please include a link back to the original post
If you want to meet like-minded Earth humans, please see https://eraoflight.com/2024/06/19/hakann-local-meetings-for-those-seeking-first-contact-with-benevolent-ets/
If you want to learn about a useful healing modality, please see https://eraoflight.com/2025/01/11/hakann-onion-healing/
Christ allowed me to read about 3 or 4 paragraphs and then reminded me of the subtleties of the gatekeepers. I can’t actually even stand the energy when coming to this site any more tbh (sorry 🤷🏻♀️) but I follow my CoreNavigation wherever instructed.
Lancaster, CA mayor has openly called for a “purge” of the homeless in his area, by rounding them up in one place and feeding them fentanyl. He comes across as proud as he gives glimpse inside his heart and mind of the murders he wants committed against HUMANS. He even quotes the Bible – something about “if they don’t work, they don’t eat”. He has lots of supporters.
This is the EVIL that sits in the vessels that sit in the seats of “authority” in this twisted society – and no doubt, his seat is small potato. Yet, he must feel quite ‘safe’ to advocate such things, as publicly as he is doing. To those that continue to try to convince others to “love and light” it all away, with all these sounds good approaches – We wish you well 🙏
To any others that are no longer buying the bs – ❤️🔥 YOUR CoreNavigation is Calling You Home. There is ONE, and You’re IT.
WE are the “ground crew” and Christ Lives within us. This coming is with a SWORD, not with “words”. One creates crap, the other cuts through it. We each have choice. These other entities are not required as chaperones- you cannot know where they originate, nor lead. ❤️🔥
Take what I’ve stated and run this shiz through your discernment mill – SOURCE wants the attention you’ve been feeding elsewhere. Do not stand in another’s truth, find your own – it’s GodsGifting!
I love you all, and each – even the Humans trapped in cohabitated vessels 🙏
It seems appropriate that you’re against ‘understanding people before arguing with them’ but I’m quite sure ‘Christ’ was against drawing swords to them before reading their articles. I guess we’ll never know!
So you want me to “love” the very same people who want to take everything away from me because they think they’re entitled to rule the planet, and then use the petty excuse of “generational trauma” to make them look more “human”?
Yeah, no. Throw them in the sun first and them we’ll talk about “love”. Some people do not deserve to breathe oxygen. Section II of the Galactic Codex.
In all honesty, I lost hope anyone coming up with “I’m not gonna love those who didn’t love me” arguments is actually looking for a debate: it seems this is something people call “venting” and that it is somehow healthy for them. If that’s your case, save us both the trouble and ignore me: I’m just ‘venting’ too.
BUT if you don’t subscribe to Hakann’s approach in this article, our mutual understanding of life choices and upbringing circumstances won’t help us either, right?
It seems to me that the thought patterns you offer are remarkably similar to those you refer to. I believe that to ‘throw them in the sun’ is, in a way, ‘taking everything away from them’, and that their conditional denial to experience love is the ultimate reason they are being cast out of here – for their own survival – not the scrutiny of some codes, which are likely merely the written version of a formless, more absolute Law.
Based it that alone, I would urge you to reconsider in favor of an unconditionally loving approach, and having the courage to accept a Justice that may or may not take the forms your mind has crystallized it with.
I reached the same conlusion, and therefore I chose to not engage, altought I was itching a bit.
Hi_guys_😁
I was going to write something about the Schumann Resonance being strong, and prompting angry releases.
I felt this channeling related to yesterday’s comments….and the unexpected altercation.
Im surprised to see the channeling inspire two passionate and fiery comments today.
I hadn’t thought of this as a triggering article.
I feel puzzled 😁💎♥️
Maybe this is me, becoming relaxed or observer or something weird like that.
Not sure!
I’ve edited my comment several times, unsure of what I mean to say, and how to say it.
Very odd.
The short comments of praise and approval are much more valued by Management, but the_compliment_department doesn’t require nearly as much funding as we do.
L_O_L
That sounds about right-
All the_compliment_department really needs, is a trendy social influencer, to be escorted to the best tables, in the best restaurants, to eat for free while being photographed 😋🍝🍱🥐
Is their Emoji Icon spot available?
We could have a contest, and vote on one!
….of course, the voters may consist of only me, you, and Raksha…..😂😂😭
If I’m the last old timer standing here, someday, I may have to reply to my own comments, just to feel valued to myself!!!😂😂😂😭😭
♥️💎😂😭😭
🤦♀️
We don’t get a lot of complaints about them and they don’t get a lot of compliments about us. I think Aki works there. They have a lovely pet seal that looks like a shmoo and brings us cheesecake on occasion.
Shmoo it is, then🦭
Cheesecake and croissants and sushi for all! I knew 2 of my previous food emoji were spot on.
Off topic, I’m back to a pleasant neutrality, after the fracas from the other day.
I appreciate_those_that still comment, especially if it’s to me, 😂haha! Spoiled rotten 😏
Who better to take care of a Shmoo, than Aki 😊😊
She’s a dear.
I’m still asking for clarity, less confusion, especially with technology. Mother Nature doesn’t connect me to other Lighties technologically, now, does she???
🤨💎♥️😁😂
Blessings to you Hakann. This was a very informative message and will be very useful when talking with others who have had a much different life situation than I have experienced. Thank you so much for taking the time to present this information to us. We look forward to meeting you face to face in the very near future. Love and Light to all who read this message.
wow fantastic article its started me on a series of conversations with my wife with a view to understanding her better on a topic one very rarely talks about and how previous life experiences can alter ones viewpoint and vice versa, and we thought we knew each other so well after 20 years together, good stuff thank you hakann. love to all.