Canada’s Climate Lockdown Pilot Scheme

By Kit Knightly | Source

Six days ago, the Canadian province of Nova Scotia announced a total ban on hiking, camping, hunting or other human activity in the forest.

A breach of this new rule is punishable by a fine up to 28,000 Canadian dollars.

Then, yesterday, New Brunswick decided to enforce a similar ban in their forests.

The aim, proponents claim, is to prevent wildfires. However, in years past, a ban on campfires was deemed good enough during wildfire season or periods of drought. A full ban on all human activity is unprecedented.

Nevertheless, there is a rather predictable list of people defending the move with language that’s all too familiar:

It rather feels like a mini-Climate lockdown. A pilot scheme to test the public response. Canada makes an ideal testing ground, they have the buzz of a newly “elected” leader and were at the forefront of Covid measures and compliance.

They’ll be watching to see how people respond to this.

10 Replies to “Canada’s Climate Lockdown Pilot Scheme”

  1. Shota

    The title of this is misleading and fearmongering – it suggests the don’t leave your home type that much of us experienced in the last 5 years. Lockdown is not appropriate for what’s being mooted, and while I too voice concern and cynicism over what’s really happening, I must say it’s not entirely an accurate and responsible line. Please take care.

    Reply
  2. Peppered Beef

    Or it could be just the opposite. On this one particular issue I just feel differently.

    For the past 8-12 weeks there’s been very little rain. FACT. Water supplies have been decreasing and this place IS a tinderbox. FACT. In the past year or so I have also been put on standby as forest fires lit by incredibly stupid people have burned hectares of land around me destroying homes and displacing families. I was there, I saw it. FACT .There are currently several fires around the province that planes and helicopters have been brought in to fight. They fished one pilot out of the lake because his helicopter crashed because it can be a dangerous job. The last thing they want is yet another one.

    On the flip side you have a bunch of people who don’t help the situation but don’t want to be inconvenienced.

    Some of the people who go into the woods ARE careless. I am ALWAYS cleaning up after people who come in to fish at a local lake. If anybody should be close to the environment it should be fishermen. They don’t take their stuff out or clean up after themselves leaving behind their garbage and bottles and other stuff.

    These will probably be the first people to demand their rights.

    You can say this is all a government conspiracy but on this I see people trying to make the best of a bad situation and trying not to make the same mistake in the same situation that burned entire subdivisions. That would be dumb now wouldn’t it?

    Just not seeing this one.

    Reply
    1. Diamond Lil

      Oh wow, Pep, there’s another side to this coin 😳

      Yes, people are A wholes. 🫠

      There’s a pond I occasionally have the chance to see, the locals ARE callous, laugh like hyenas when they drop fishing lures and drinks into the pond.

      They don’t supervise their toddlers, I’m surprised entire families don’t fall in, they behave so ignorantly.

      👏👏👏 this babe’s been schooled

      I’ve become used too used to evil big brother; there’s lots of people who go camping, without any further instruction than “the Brady Bunch goes Camping” reruns. ⛺️🔥🌲

      💎♥️😆

      Reply
      1. Raksha

        Part 1 (running tests) :

        Well, I live in a region very dry, very hot, and susceptible of fire. And I know for a fact that people are stupid and irresponsible and do not care.

        Now, is the solution to everything : more control and more governmental power ? This looks more dangerous than burning forests in my eyes.

        Reply
    2. Raksha

      You can’t force spiritual maturity unto people with laws. Well, you can protect society to an extent with laws, but right now the power structure is both creating crisis and both enforcing control laws. The control is far too much on just about anything.

      Just in my small village I am the only one it seems, to take my dog’s “thing” to put it in a dustbin… so I get your point, I do.

      Human nature never changes. Absolute control is not the way.

      Reply
      1. Raksha

        Alright, now I know for a fact that my message did not go through because instead of “dog’s thing” i said dog’s “S…”. Kejraj, the algorythm is too extreme. At least explain the rules, so that we may know. Rules should be clear.

        Reply
  3. Francis Bacon

    Similar to a prohibition against leaving your house, in order to protect you from skin burns due to UV radiation (and traffic accidents – and a number of other dire threats that being outside your house might possibly expose you to). I do have the impression this is not only corrupt, globalist controlled politicians testing people. It is also God testing people: How much pressure do you need before you wake up and realize the politicians are under the control of powers that want to enslave you, and then act accordingly and either vote in new politicians or simply ignore their laws en masse?

    Reply
    1. Diamond Lil

      I hope they flagrantly defy this order, in massive numbers, with their arms linked together.

      I mean thousands, a few dozen rebels would have, and have had, their lives bulldozed by their rulers.

      I feel very badly offering such far fetched advice, though.

      I’ve nothing but Luv n Light to help them with ☹️💎
      This is life in a rigged voting system.

      Reply

Leave a Reply to Peppered BeefCancel reply