There is Only One You in the Entire Cosmos

Greetings! From heart to heart in this moment we speak, I am KejRaj!

There are billions of stars and planets just in our local Universe, with trillions of souls.

Now, all the souls that exist, throughout the cosmos, in all the dimensions, including You, not two single souls are exactly alike.

Your light, qualities, love, and overall composition may be 99% the same. However, it is the 1%, the unique Spiritual Signature that each soul has that is unlike that of another.

There is only one You. Trillions of souls in the Universe, and every each one of these soul’s has a unique energy code, which emits its own unique frequency, unlike any other soul. A special extraordinary tone and note to the Universal orchestra.

There is only one You in the entire cosmos.

This is your individuality. You will be and have this eternally, in every dimension. You may dance with many, merge in groups, in love and sacred unions, grow and expand infinitely. However, you will never lose your spiritual individuality. You are an eternal and unique spark of All That Is.

Blessings!

29 Replies to “There is Only One You in the Entire Cosmos”

  1. Ed

    Thank You KejRaj
    Thank You ALL
    QUANTUM LOVE

    STARSEEDS OF GAIA, YOU DEFEATED 7 SHADOW BEINGS — NOW EVEN DARKNESS FEARS YOU | THE PLEIADIANS
    294 views · 6 hours ago
    #SpiritualAwakening #PleiadianMessages #HigherConsciousness
    …more

    Voices of the Pleiades
    4.59K

    Yes…
    😘💎💓

    Reply
  2. Inquisitioner

    How can you say there’s only “one” of us when Galactics keep saying there are multiple “us”es (e.g. Higher Self) out there? You people keep contradicting yourselves big time. No wonder nobody takes you seriously.

    Reply
    1. Raksha

      There is no contradiction. We are multi-faceted, multi-dimensional, and all facets of the Divine Creator are unique. It seems to me you did not care to read with an open-mind and open-heart.

      Reply
      1. Inquisitor

        If we are multidimensional then we are not only “one” in the cosmos, as whoever posted this seems to imply. But then I’m the one who didn’t care to read… you people reek of cult-like mentality. No rationale. No brain. No soul. Only “love and light”. You do realize we’re in the middle of an intel war right?

        Reply
        1. Gwydyon

          Does „in the end All is One“ conflict with “there is a war going on between Dark and Light which calls for discernment“?

          Reply
          1. Inquisitor

            “There is Only One You in the Entire Cosmos” conflicts directly with “You Are A Multi-Dimensional Being”, which implies there are multiple of you. “Multiple” is not “One”. Which part of this is so hard for you people to understand?

          2. Raksha

            Kj said, to my understanding, that there is one unique YOU. This is not contradictory with the notion that there are many facets of YOU. Each remains Unique. Uniqueness was the point of the message, as I understand it.

    2. A.S.

      Under the scientific paradigm, if two statements are in contradiction, one must be discarded — as you’re indicating.

      But if we’re doing spirituality, it’s more useful to see statements as tools, all of which have varying utility and places where it’s good to apply them. And it’s good to have a well-filled toolkit with lots of tools, and to know when to apply which. Hence two seemingly contradictory statements are just two different tools, to be employed in different situations.

      To illustrate this, a spiritual principle is “we’re all one.” But when dealing with life situations or average people, you simply cannot talk or act like this consistently. Hence those are two different tools.

      Jesus / Yeshua talked about “turn the other cheek”, and the Buddha taught nonviolence. That’s a fantastic tool for some situations. And in another situation, someone is about to end a group of children, and the proper action is to end the person doing that before he can end the children.

      etc

      Or if this doesn’t satisfy you: you can think of the “one” as the outermost Russian doll, and our higher self is one of the Russian dolls inside it.

      Reply
      1. Inquisitor

        That’s the point. I see a lot of cultists here just parroting “love and light” and forgetting we’re in the middle of an intel war. Nothing can be trusted except visible, physical displays of UFOs in the sky. What I’m asking is for you people to open the Matroshka, perceive reality as it is and take action. This is not Woodstock.

        Reply
        1. the_complaint_department

          You’re not asking, you’re demanding impolitely; and of a group you exclude yourself from, tried your best to insult, and which didn’t ask you for help. Good luck with that.

          Reply
        2. A.S.

          “Nothing can be trusted except visible, physical displays of UFOs in the sky.”

          Now you’re operating from a slightly different scientific paradigm, where statements must be discarded if they aren’t proven by experiment or direct observation.

          Reply
          1. Inquisitor

            How can you believe something you can’t even see? This is literally cult-like mentality. No different than “believing in God” or “Trust me bro”.

            Do some research about the Epicurean paradox. I’ve yet to meet a single soul in this planet that is able to refute that with actual arguments that make any kind of sense.

          2. Nixael

            Everyone constructs their consciousness as they wish. That’s what free will is for. Some believe the Earth is spherical, others flat. Some believe in God, others don’t. Of course, debate is possible, but arguments are unnecessary. Imposing your beliefs on others is also unnecessary.

            Answer: You also don’t see the shape of the Earth, but you hold onto some concept and you have in your consciousness its shape.

          3. Acc

            We can simply calculate that the Earth is a sphere; this has nothing to do with consciousness.

            The ancient Greek scholar compared the difference in the Sun’s shadow angle at noon between two cities and found it to be about 7.2° (1/50 of a full circle).

            By multiplying the distance between the cities by 50 to get Earth’s circumference and using C=πD, he calculated Earth’s diameter to be about 12,700 km.

            We need things that we can see, visible, physical displays of UFOs in the sky or event.
            We don’t need the aliens indifferent to the suffering of Earthlings and blaming them entirely.
            We don’t need apsychic message from indifferent and Lack of empathy.

          4. Raksha

            About the Epicurean paradox. It is easily resolved if one consider that benevolance can express itself in the giving of Free will. So the addition of Free will resolves the paradox.

            Also, an UFO display could very well be an illusion or an hologram, just sayin’.

          5. Klaudia

            “The problem is easily solved if one considers that benevolence can be expressed in granting free will. Therefore, adding free will resolves the paradox.”

            Your calculation only works if one knows that free will has never existed. Paradoxical? Not at all.

            Anyone who still hasn’t understood these days WHY God HAD TO ALLOW all this cruel madness in order for HIS BEINGNESS to express itself, understands even less about Mathematics than I do, and that’s hardly possible.❤️

          6. the_complaint_department

            Actually Klaudia, despite the paradox; telling others ‘there is no free will’ instead of ‘there is no cruel madness’ is where free will hides. Quantum stuff.

            It is a cruel madness that many facets of ‘God’, including Epicurus, arrogantly continue to choose, proving both existences are intrinsically linked.

            It’s not complicated math, equations can have two right answers too.

          7. Klaudia

            “Actually t_c_d My Master” always manages to explain to me, without words, exactly WHY I wrote what I did.

            But of course, that wouldn’t have been possible without “your” words.😊

        3. Viktor

          Was das Thema Vertrauen angeht, haben Sie teilweise Recht. Ich habe schon oft UFOs gesehen, aber niemand ist je ausgestiegen oder hat etwas gesagt. Daher kann man unmöglich mit absoluter Sicherheit sagen, dass gechannelte Botschaften von Außerirdischen stammen, oder zumindest nicht alle, bei Weitem nicht alle. Menschen betrügen gern und fälschen solche Botschaften wahrscheinlich, um ihre Ziele zu verfolgen. Doch schon zwischen 1955 und 1965 fragten Menschen Ashtar: „Warum kommunizieren Sie durch einen Channeler, anstatt zu landen und direkt mit ihm zu sprechen?“ Ashtar antwortete: „Dieser ‚Gott‘ hat ihnen erlaubt, speziell (und nur) in dieser Form mit der Menschheit zu kommunizieren.“ Natürlich gibt es viele Fälle, in denen Kontaktpersonen UFOs gesehen und persönlich mit Außerirdischen kommuniziert haben (vielleicht waren das Ausnahmen oder Regelverstöße), aber allgemeiner Massenkontakt ist verboten.

          Warum glaube ich Ashtars frühen Botschaften größtenteils? Weil er Dinge beschrieb, die ein gewöhnlicher Channeler unmöglich wissen konnte (unter anderem, dass es das erste Mal war, keine Wiederholung), und nur Menschen mit persönlichem Kontakt Bescheid wissen. Wenn jemand behauptet, ein UFO gesehen zu haben, beweist das nichts, da es außer seiner Aussage keine Beweise gibt und daher niemand verpflichtet ist, ihm zu glauben. Ein UFO zu sehen, „Gott“ zu sehen und an die Wahrheit gechannelter Texte von „Aliens“ zu glauben, ist für die meisten Menschen dasselbe.

          Selbst wenn viele oder die meisten gechannelten Texte nicht von echten Außerirdischen stammen und gefälscht sind, sind ihre Verfasser dennoch gezwungen, die ursprünglichen Ideen und Konzepte, die auch in den ursprünglichen Botschaften vorhanden waren, immer wieder zu wiederholen. Das heißt, sie können immer noch einen Funken Wahrheit enthalten. Natürlich bedeutet die Suche nach diesen Körnchen Wahrheit, ständig „die Spreu vom Weizen zu trennen“, mit einem hohen Risiko, getäuscht zu werden und sich von den manipulativen Ideen (der Agenda) bestimmter Channeler die eigene Weltanschauung verzerren zu lassen und zu deren Fanatiker zu werden. Allerdings stehen den Menschen keine anderen Informationsquellen zu diesem Thema zur Verfügung.

          Reply
          1. Gwydyon

            I think in a war like this we need to utilize our intuition. The separation paradigm is a strong tool to keep humanity controlled. They/we are easier to drive against each other then. The unity consciousness is the antidote for this imo. Of course when it turns into naive „Love and Light, all is perfect, just look away from darkness and it’s not there anymore“ it serves again the dark’s interest.

            So if you want to wake up those under the pink Love and Light spell better look closely first. The more you understand the people the more open they will react to you.

Leave a Reply to RakshaCancel reply