Written by: A.S.On some points there’s no consensus on what is true and what is false about Pleiadians. Why? Because most people aren’t able to just discern / know what is true and what isn’t.
As an illustration: a third of the spiritual community is convinced that they have true inner knowing that Trump’s a good guy, and a third of the spiritual community is convinced that they have true inner knowing that Trump’s a bad guy. Whichever side is right, there’s a huge number of people out there who are labeling their own emotions as “true inner knowing.”
As another illustration, here are my opinions about the channel / hub “GFL station”:
https://www.youtube.com/@
At the same time, for example https://gflstation.com/the-
—-
“Soft disclosure normalizes the premise. Medium disclosure teaches the mechanisms. Look closer still at the machinery your screenwriters keep describing with such suspicious accuracy, Paycheck’s oracle-machine dismantled by its own builders upon realizing the seeing itself births the catastrophe, Minority Report’s futures viewed and policed, Devs’ deterministic screen kept in corporate secrecy, the obdurate past of 11.22.63 physically shoving back against its editors and repairing each wound they cut, Loki’s Time Variance Authority pruning unruly branches outside of time to protect one sacred trunk, Interstellar’s father falling beyond a dark star who discovers the helpful beings reaching through the walls of moments are his own descendants, guiding him home, and stack beside them The Philadelphia Experiment of nineteen eighty-four dramatizing the Eldridge by name, The Final Countdown sailing a carrier back to Pearl Harbor’s eve, Stargate and its long television descendants teaching a ring network with factions and custody, Donnie Darko sacrificing a broken branch so the trunk survives, Frequency mending a murder-line across a father’s radio, Déjà Vu, Tenet, Primer, Groundhog Day, on and on across ten decades.“
—-
For what it’s worth, https://app.gptzero.me/
Plus if you look in GFL station’s archives you will see the youtube channel started in 2024, right when “make a youtube channel filled with AI created messages” became a viable business strategy.
Also, GFL station’s narrative contradicts itself if you look at their old videos:
In April 2025, https://www.youtube.com/
In July 2025, https://www.youtube.com/
In December 2025, https://www.youtube.com/
In June 2026, https://www.youtube.com/
“A Natural Separation Is Occurring.” Wait, didn’t the split happen in April 2025, then also in July 2025, then also in early 2026?
“A Natural Separation Is Occurring.” Wait, didn’t the split happen in April 2025, then also in July 2025, then also in early 2026?In July 2026, https://www.youtube.com/
Furthermore, their youtube videos (not just a few specific ones) contain in the description: “DISCLAIMER: all GFL content is created for entertainment purposes ONLY.” Well if you’re convinced you’re channeling Ashtar, and the video isn’t saying anything illegal / defamatory, then why put that under your video? It seems disrespectful to Ashtar and your audience. Plenty of channelers publish channelings on Youtube without that disclaimer, and don’t get into trouble.
However if you put out AI-generated “channeled” messages behind a patreon paywall… yeah, then you may want to have such a “for entertainment purposes ONLY” disclaimer.
Then there’s GFL station’s clickbait headlines and the strong focus on monetization.
So, it’s my opinion that about 159k people are convinced that an AI youtube channel is posting genuine channelings.
And undoubtedly there are more fake or heavily distorted messages out there that some people are nonetheless sincerely buying into.
It’s a huge ego trap to think “well those misguided people are falling for fake channelings. Of course, I have discernment, and I’ve figured out what the genuine channelings are.” But the thing is, those other people think that you’re the misguided one, and they’re the ones who’ve found the true channelings (which contradict the ones you believe).
And sure, some fake channelings are easy to spot. In some cases you probably can genuinely identify fake stuff. Yet, other fake / heavily distorted channelings are genuinely hard to identify.
So, what to do?
Well, if you’re able to access genuine intuition or talk to your soul, then listen to that. However, most people can’t do this — they’ve just deluded themselves into thinking they can, and they just label whatever emotionally pleases them as “resonant and therefore true.” But that doesn’t actually point to the truth.
Even if you can’t access intuition or your soul, you should still listen to your emotions and your gut feelings and what resonates. It’s useful data. Still, your emotions / gut / “what resonates” can steer you away from painful truths, and towards pleasant lies.
An easy way to get compliments in the spiritual community is to write “follow your resonance / discernment / guidance / heart and you will KNOW what is true.” But the fact is, if the average person tries this, it could work but there’s also a decent chance they’ll fervently start believing in nonsense.
People shouldn’t teach spiritual novices that whatever resonates with them is the objective truth. And most people are spiritual novices. Some people who think they’re not spiritual novices — are still spiritual novices. (It’s an easy trap to fall into. There was a period of several years when I thought I wasn’t a spiritual novice anymore, but looking back, I still was.)
If you think “I had inner knowing this one time, and I later got undeniable proof that it was true” — okay, that very well could be true. Genuine inner knowing does exist. However, that proves you had true inner knowing once or a few times, not that you can always know what’s true and what’s false.
If you are able to always know what’s true and what’s false, then why aren’t you making millions on the site Polymarket? That’s a site where you can bet on all sorts of things, and where you could make literal millions if you could flawlessly tell truth from falsehood.
Hence most people can’t just access genuine intuition on demand. Then for those people, how can they know what’s true?
Some channelers might want to say “well I’ve had these experiences, and these two sources agree with what I’m saying, and I firmly believe I’m right, and also you can’t prove that I’m wrong.” Sure, but if that’s sufficient proof, then thousands of channelers are all “proven to be right” even though they’re saying contradictory things. It’s not practically helpful.
“I’ve had a dream / flash of insight / inner knowing / revelation that [a certain thing] will happen” isn’t sufficient proof either, because if you accept that as proof, then you have to believe several contradicting narratives at once. I’m not saying this is necessarily all nonsense, but often it’s just a situation where people see ONE possible future but instead think they’ve seen THE future.
So, what should we do?
Well, an underrated approach is to reason from first principles.
First principles are basic, foundational truths. We can then use logic to derive conclusions from those first principles. In this context, there’s little that we can 100% mathematically prove, hence our first principles are things we’re pretty sure about.
Namely, here are our two first principles:
1: The time of our liberation / meeting with galactics has been repeatedly delayed (the “soon – delay” pattern)
2: There are galactics walking and flying around on Earth
Are we 100% sure about these two first principles? No, but we’re pretty sure about them because a huge number of channelers, contactees, whistleblowers, scientists, Quantum Healing Hypnosis, etc people all agree on this.
Plus, if you reject these first principles, then we’re basically back to “everyone just believes what resonates for them” which, as we’ve established, isn’t reliable for most people.
My channelings have done the “soon – delay” pattern, by predicting that people’s lives would substantially improve before the end of 2025, which didn’t happen. I apologize for that.
Note that even many sources which claim not to give dates, still show the soon – delay pattern if you read their old message. For example, Cobra from 2012portal.blogspot.com also shows the “soon-delay” pattern:
– In 2012 he posted that First Contact will happen some time after the end of 2012: https://2012portal.
– In 2016 he posted that the ascension window closes by 2025: https://2012portal.
—–
Okay, so what’s the point of discussing these two first principles?
Well, they’re actually surprisingly effective at helping you evaluate theories about what’s likely going on.
For example, consider the theory “we’re waiting for the arrival of nibiru / for a pole shift.” Is this likely? Well no, because if that was the case, we wouldn’t see the “soon – delay” pattern. Galactics would just do some physics and wouldn’t give us “soon” messages for over a decade which then don’t come to pass.
Or consider the theory “galactics aren’t allowed to intervene.” Is this plausible? Well no, because they are walking and flying around and showing themselves and sometimes talking to us. So clearly they can intervene. And if you want to argue those things don’t count as intervening, then why aren’t they doing a whole lot more flying around / meeting people than they’re doing now?
Or consider the theory “well galactics simply have to beat astral entities first / have to wait for the energy or for our consciousness or people’s consent to reach a certain level. Then they’ll land.” Is that plausible? Well maybe that’s part of the situation, but if that was all that was going on, you wouldn’t see the repeated “soon => delay” pattern. Then you’d just have Pleiadian scientists drawing a graph and having a pretty good idea when they’ll land, rather than constantly going “soon => delay.”
Or consider the theory: “they are landing, just in higher-vibration timelines than the ones we’re in.” Is that plausible? At most that’s part of the situation. It can’t be the whole story because galactics are lowering our vibration with the “soon => delay” pattern. It would be evil (which I don’t think they are), or sub-optimal from their side to lower our vibration with “soon => delay” messages that then keep us in a lower timeline where we can’t meet them.
In my mind, the only thing that really makes sense if we reason from first principles is some kind of flaw with galactic leadership / Ashtar. If he’s a good person but also indecisive or struggling under the weight of responsibility, then that’s the only thing I can think of that actually would lead to a “soon => delay” pattern.
And it would explain things if average Pleiadians just aren’t thinking that much about Earth / are only “moderately good”, and as such there’s no large amount of popular pressure on Ashtar to land already.
I know some people don’t emotionally like that explanation, but what proof do you have that Ashtar actually is this perfect being? Isn’t that just people emotionally liking the idea of a perfect savior coming down to take care of them?
A possible counterargument is “well Jesus was perfect, so why wouldn’t Ashtar be” but the actual flesh-and-blood Jesus wasn’t perfect (even though he was a great man). For example, Mark 11:12-14 says:
“The next day as they were leaving Bethany, Jesus was hungry. Seeing in the distance a fig tree in leaf, he went to find out if it had any fruit. When he reached it, he found nothing but leaves, because it was not the season for figs. Then he said to the tree, “May no one ever eat fruit from you again.””
That’s quite petty and human — which is also a decent proof that it really happened. After all, if you make up a perfect savior, then you wouldn’t make up a story where he sounds silly. That’s called the Criterion of Embarrassment.
Now yes you can argue that non-physical beings, including arguably Jesus after his death, are near-perfect. But they’re not the ones in charge of deciding, for example, when the Pleiadians will land.
So, keep these two first principles in mind. And when you see a theory about what’s going on or why the galactics haven’t landed yet, feel free to test it against those two first principles. It’s not perfect, but “I believe whatever resonates with me” is even less reliable for most people.
So, I hope this was helpful.
With love,
A.S.
“In my mind, the only thing that really makes sense if we reason from first principles is some kind of flaw with galactic leadership / Ashtar. If he’s a good person but also indecisive or struggling under the weight of responsibility, then that’s the only thing I can think of that would actually lead to a “soon => delay” pattern… I know some people don’t emotionally like that explanation, but what proof do you have that Ashtar is actually this perfect being? Isn’t that just people emotionally liking the idea of a perfect savior coming down to take care of them?” –
You rush from one extreme to another. Either perfect or indecisive. In your thoughts, you don’t take into account the lore (general context), which is that the Galactic Federation has been at war with the reptilians across the galaxy for thousands and millions of years. Ashtar himself is only about 20,000+ years old. If Ashtar and the Galactic Federation were perfect, they would have won long ago. However, the war is still ongoing, which means they’re not perfect. If Ashtar and the Galactic Federation were as imperfect and indecisive as you describe them in your channels, like ordinary people on Earth or worse, they would have lost the war long ago. So the truth lies somewhere in the middle. They’re not perfect, but they’re also not as useless as they appear in your channels.
Regarding the dates, as I said earlier, this could be disinformation, given the war. If it’s not disinformation, it’s worth remembering that the very first messages from the 1950s contained no reports of “ascension, mass landing, quantum transition, specific dates (eternal waiting), etc.” All of this appeared later, when people themselves formed a “new age pop culture” that combined Ashtar and Jesus, speculated on quantum themes, and introduced messianic motifs. Of course, if this is true, then the topic of a “cosmic war” is off the table.
So we have two different phenomena: 1. The real UFO phenomenon. 2. The pop culture created around this phenomenon, but possibly not directly related to UFOs. Thus, until UFO pilots officially introduce themselves and tell us about themselves, we won’t know anything for sure.
I wouldn’t be surprised if you came running to kick me off the site again, asking, “Why are you reading here then?” However, I’m seeking the truth, not a fanatic, which is why I’m here. Besides, this isn’t your site, and there’s plenty of other material here.
May I (comment) (a little) here?:)
a. God knows (not me!:)), Ashtar may be ‘indecisive’ (or whatnot). But we have no ‘real way’ to ‘know it’ (as such). We ‘speculate’. – ‘Maybe, maybe not’.:)
b. This ‘soon, then delay’ method reminds me of a rocking technique that is often used to liberate a car that is stuck in mud or snow. If we, Earthlings, are ‘parts of the Creator of All’ (and we are–as far as I know) and if we are co-creators with the Creator of All (and we are–as far as I know), then Ashtar at al. maybe simply are trying to help us (the best way they can–for now?:)) to ‘wake up’ to the idea of e.t. existence and presence (on Earth)?
Every time they ‘push’ us in this direction–more of this energy collects in the human consciousness of Earth. ‘More’ but (so far) not ‘enough’ to pass the ‘conscious level’ of acceptance (I guess). One day it will.
I don’t like the ‘roll back’ or ‘backsliding’ either, but what to do? .. I am pretty sure that our ‘labor’ here is not Sisyphus’s labor, hehe, — I hope!:) And ‘one day’ we (as a humanity) will ‘break the surface’ of our collective consciousness on this matter. — What is ‘the statistics’ there on that ‘threshold level’: 3 percent or 10 percent?:)
c. My best understanding of this situation is akin to that old saying that ‘though the dogs bark, the caravan moves on’. We clearly have ‘setbacks’ – that is so. But we also have ‘progress’. Otherwise, none of us would be here by now. And, yet, we still are here – ‘pushing it (the e.t. agenda) forward’. ‘Hopeless’? – I don’t think so. – ‘Time consuming’? – It is!:)
But let ‘the dogs (‘the defender souls’)’ ‘get used’ to the caravan (arriving – ‘on our shore’). Eventually they will ‘calm down’ and ‘go around their own business’. And this will be ‘the time’ to ‘land’ — in my humble opinion. I can be wrong (of course). .. I see this ‘barking’ (resistance to e.t. agenda) is a ‘sign’ of ‘landing’. As the ‘pressure’ between our two worldviews ‘equalizes’ (‘over time’), the (actual) contact becomes more and more ‘possible’, is it not so? I think it is! — Forward then! .. And then back again, hehehe.:) – ‘Rocking the rock’! – Or dancing?? – “Two steps forward and then one step back”?:) .. Hmm, this is also a known technique of how our human consciousness learns new things.. (and especially new behaviors). .. Maybe things are ‘exactly where they are supposed to be (right now)’? Even if ‘today’ it IS, shall we say, ‘slightly uncomfortable’?? — And are these ‘the birth pains’ (of the new reality)–as it ‘crashes through’ ‘the old reality’??? Man, ‘interesting times’ to live in (indeed)!:)
You can reason about faith, and you can have faith in reason. What you can’t do is mix them as arguments because you end up having neither.
To make it more clear: I think your apologies and suggestions are misplaced because they are based on the assumption that what works for you will work for everyone else.
For instance, I recall one of your channelees saying that we shouldn’t fear AI because it relies on logic and it logically had no reason to turn against humanity. It was dis-comforting for a lot of people because their primary lens of the universe isn’t logic – while others would gladly leap off a bridge if their GPS told them it was the best route alternative.
Regarding souls more attuned to the Blue Ray than the others, it simply does not make sense to logically question what the Federation represents. This is who you call for protection, the calming, reassuring presence. The idea of Ashtar taking decisiveness classes felt particularly ridiculous to them since we’re talking about someone literally in charge of bringing forth the Will of God, if there is such a thing.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure he has flaws – most people in this density have them – but they likely lean towards the opposite direction, of being ‘overly decisive’. If anything, the guy you channeled felt to me like he knew exactly what he was doing and had things (what he MEANT to have, not what others demand from him) under control.
So the suggestion of using logic axioms to draw conclusions is certainly valid to those more prone to that, but the vast majority isn’t – not because they’re flawed, simply because they’re more primarily aligned to different virtues such as faith.
There’s no need for them to keep saying “we’ll meet soon” and so on. If they live for several hundred years, they have a completely different perspective on time.
I wouldn’t be surprised if everything got pushed back another 10 years or even longer. There’s no point in waiting; it’s better to just get on with life, period.
Unfortunately, you can’t just forget what you’ve learned and fall back asleep after waking up. For me personally, life after waking up has become such a hollow shell, and I don’t really care about anything much anymore.
Back when I didn’t know that life was eternal, I cared more about life, but now that I’m sure I have eternity to play with, what difference does it make where I work, what I do, or who I’m with?
I thought the truth would be more joyful, but it seems empty and meaningless.
So be careful what you wish for, because it might not be what you wanted 😀
As for channelings, I’ve read hundreds of thousands of them over the years, and I have to tell you that most of them are New Age nonsense.
These seem real for many reasons, which I won’t go into detail about in the comments, there’s not enough space here.
I’ve encountered ET stepdowns at least twice. I think there were more, but I didn’t recognize them. They’ve probably learned how to camouflage themselves better to evade my intuitive radar.
I suspect you’ve also crossed paths with one of them in your life but didn’t even realize it.
Why do YOU apologize for the content of your channeled messages? If you didn’t distort it you did everything right. People still are responsible themselves for what to do with messages from channeled persons – who also believed what they said.
Thank you for your well thought out article.
They are all stories outside of yourself. The only story that is important is the one inside yourself.
As You journey deeper into the Stillness within, you see that none of the will, it won’t it, matters.
I would humbly suggest that We cultivate our inner life and leave the speculation to those who haven’t found their way home yet. Blessings to All who journey in this Now
What is going on outside is not important, the most important for ascension is what is going on inside ourselves. What’s going on outside is the play out of the 3D illusion of earth matrix. When you obtain the frequency of ascension, you can ascend at any time. What others (including Pleiadians or other ETs) said is not important, what matters is your inner God knowing.
The cobra intel is the most accurate to what is going on.
Fix earth faster.
Amen 😊👍🎉