We can send spacecraft to the Moon, build supercomputers, and harness the energy of the Sun; but somehow we still cannot create an economic system that actually serves everyone.
Instead, millions spend their lives working just to survive, while a small number accumulate extraordinary wealth from their labor.
Maybe the real measure of human progress is no how far we can travel into space, but whether we can build a society where no one has to spend their entire life simply trying to survive. ~KejRaj
Yes, there is a potential framework for humanity and the planet, and it has been around for 30 years, although the majority of the content has been received in the last 20 years.
It is called a Greenprint4LIFE and it addresses many of the biggest questions, while also offering a framework for community re-creation, including governance, economy, judicial/legal, education, health and much more.
https://greenprint4life.earth
Since this website generally has strong right-wing, conspiratorial spin…. you guys are so close… so… ridiculously close to re-discover what liberals were all about. And hey, one more thing…. Take a closer look at some EU countries that used to be under influence of Soviet Union. They do have paid maternity leave spanning months, they do have state-sponsored healthcare…. and they don’t feel like there’s communist boot back on their neck. Meanwhile in USA people work themselves into hysteria and paint non-conservatives as Satan incarnate. And then expect some deux-ex-machina event that flips the switch and suddenly everyone would be taken care of.
I’m not sure what you mean by “what liberals were all about,” but I don’t think the New Age community’s drift to the right is mainly about traditional politics or economics.
To me, the real dividing line today is globalization vs. nationalism. That’s the current terrain.
But you’re right about the “switch.” And personally, I don’t see either left-wingers or right-wingers as inherently righteous or satanic.
After decades in more liberal New England but retired now in a Red state (Louisiana), I can say firsthand that Liberals are MUCH better at:
+Healthcare (Affordable Care Act, Medicaid expansion, etc.)
+Feeding children, pregnant women and the poor (SNAP and WIC, which also supports farmers)
+Protecting Nature (clean air/water/land, wilderness and animals)
+Supporting Clean energy, rather than polluting oil and coal
+Or as my in-law, a respected Catholic Cajun dentist here points out often on Facebook – Liberal policies align much more closely to the teachings of Christ.
“Space” travel is bogus anyway.
Yes. Resource driven economy perhaps? Humans don’t like sharing. Sociopathic cultures and toxic individualism. Apathy.
It was the ability to share that created communities in the first place. The problem isn’t them, but us. Our willingness to share, to respect ourselves enough to insist on what we deserve, to not just lament the problem but intentionally design our inner vs. our outer space so we can create solutions. That is key.
What is the handlers never intended for there to be peace and prosperity because they benefit from fragmentation, disparity and war? So the system is designed to pull everyone in either extreme. It seems to me the frontier to be scaled, as much as outer space may hold possibilities, is learning how to balance our world so there is enough for all. Those at the high end should be required to give back a certain percentage to raise the available currency in circulation, as the system is so ill-designed to always create debt. We are many and if we were to find common ground, our perspectives and thoughts would take us far beyond outer space! Escaping is not the answer. Solving our problem is, and it takes intentional effort to not see our fellow humans as potential enemies but possible friends. Of course that takes congruent action. Religion has divided. It is time to rise above the dogma and not allow the system to rob you of your potentials. United we win, divided we fail.
Control thru chaos and artificial lack ..manmade illnesses manmade storms .. earthquakes .. wars famine all of it is about fear and control. The great earth experiment has failed really why galactics had to intervene to stop them from killing 90% of humanity and enslaving the rest. Now is Q real will our military finally defend We The People .. we shall see who is who.. lock and load just in case it’s all been a psy op …sorry kejraj but we really don’t know for sure it’s 2026 and all the so called experts had us ascended before 2025 pole shift …3 waves in fact…always a delay
The real disservice to humanity is having the answer in place and not allowing those who have been ready for years to move forward.
Exactly. Now all we have to do is rid the world of those doing the “not allowing.” More and more we are seeing AI not allowing, pushing organic humans around with endless mind looping nonsense. Phones are the trap and people are willingly holding them in their hands every day. Shut it off for a week and see what life looks like outside of Plato’s cave. You’ll find everything becomes very limited, your life basically shuts down to zero point, and the blessed silence you hear is life outside the matrix. Only the brave get to enter the brave New World.
Clones, hybrids, and NPCs do not want changes that would drive progress toward 5D. Naturally, they do want changes that impose even greater control and obedience.
The problem is that at people’s current level of consciousness and with the Earth as it is, people don’t just want to have enough for themselves. Instead they want to have more than others so that they’re higher-status than others and get more affection than others and have access to better mating opportunities than others.
“It is not enough that I should succeed – others must fail”
So the current system, where a lot of people are poor, is working exactly as intended. And while yes, the dark controllers exist and like people being poor, normal non-cabal people also like others being poorer and lower-status than them. Maybe they’re willing to uplift others from very poor to moderately poor, but there’s substantial research out there saying that people don’t generally like it when previously-lower status people get up to their level.
How to solve this?
Option 1: raise people’s consciousness
Option 2: unleash technologies that make abundance so wide-spread that there’s no keeping that metaphorical genie in the bottle
True individuals with a soul and heightened consciousness are in the minority. Yet, they are the only ones ready for change. It is impossible to raise the consciousness of programmed NPC-like individuals.
Sure a number of people are beyond hope, but there are people out there with a soul and with the potential to grow who simply haven’t actualized themselves yet.
If you met 20-year old me, there’s a decent chance you would have labeled me as a programmed NPC-like individual, because at that time I was.
Politicians are enacting increasingly strict laws, but will a non-politician who has discovered their potential change the world? Will they create the kind of financial system that KejRaj—and I, for that matter—dream of?
I note KejRaj used the word ‘economic’, not ‘financial’. Maybe the distinction matters in order to enact any change.
In a scenario where concealing the truth becomes absolutely impossible, strict laws are useless and ultimately a time-buying diversion.
I’m betting on option #2 as a means to #1 for the vast majority of people, but kudos on staying loyal to #1.
>Communism
>National Socialism
Seems like we need a Nikola Tesla of economics, otherwise we may have just more fighting between the latter and the former. Economics is a hot topic that many spiritual movements base themselves upon, which promotes bloodbaths based on economics. So, what I’m getting at is perhaps a gentle introduction to something that doesn’t necessarily identify with either might be pertinent. Though NS functioned quite well without the world piling on top of it too. China likes to espouse its success as well, but it too is authoritarian. Choosing either will probably lead to more conflicts if implemention is pushed beyond what the populations are willing to accept. Touchy. But culture seems to be rapidly evolving at this time so we can more than likely get a solution to more equitable economics soon in more places than one.