Losing the Plot on COVID

What happens when a population of introverts, hypochondriacs, and obsessive-compulsives is continuously bombarded with messages to seclude and disinfect themselves, for fear that COVID-19 prickle-balls lurk everywhere, waiting to attack?

What happens is that emotionally damaged people start driving bad politics and bad policy.

“Fifteen days to flatten the curve.” That phrase is surely now banned by corporate media, for it reminds us how the supposedly acute health threat of March 2020 was repeatedly re-packaged to keep populations off-balance and out of business not for 15 days, but for 15 months.

Never in modern times has a health issue been so flagrantly politicized, nor wielded as a club, as the Wuhan virus has been. Outside a few rational locales, almost every nation drank the COVID Kool-Aid, competing to see who could enforce the stupidest rules.

Naturally, academia would lead the way:

Among Americans aged 15–24, a total of 587 died of COVID in 2020, according to the CDC, representing about 0.16%, or about 1 in 642, of COVID deaths. If you are young, you have essentially no chance of dying of COVID. The low youth mortality impact from COVID was known by April 2020.

Yet many universities now require these low-risk young people to inject the experimental vaccine or be banished from campus. Did you already catch the WuFlu and have antibodies? Too bad. The great pulsating brains of academia cannot differentiate.

Young people who want to serve their country are also targets: the passive-aggressive command at West Point compels the unvaccinated to sacrifice a week’s vacation to quarantine and then to wear masks in the most ridiculous circumstances imaginable — to harass them and make them look like fools. Military leaders do not care whether the experimental vaccines might do more harm than good, especially on a previously COVID-exposed youth. Take the jab and shut up, cadet; Colonel Suckup needs to PowerPoint his 100% compliance success.

Famed baseball pitcher Anthony Fauci claims that he is Science personified, yet anyone can make simple deductions that have eluded the doctor: there is effectively no difference in COVID rates between regions that went full Stalin on COVID rules and those areas that took a more holistic or decentralized approach to the virus.

Great Britain, with its multiple draconian lockdowns, has a COVID case rate of 6.76% of the population, while Sweden, which mostly left schools and businesses open and went soft-touch on mask mandates, has a case rate of 10.7%. But Sweden’s death rate is 20% lower than the U.K.’s, so what was the point of Britain’s lockdown hysteria?

**Source

4 Replies to “Losing the Plot on COVID”

  1. COVID causes Climate Change

    So let’s say Epstein “committed suicide” in 2020 instead of 2019. They would’ve taken a swab of his fluids, ran a 40 cycle PCR test, found a nanogram of something that might’ve once been a COVID virus and listed him as another COVID casualty. Yes, it’s all bullschiff.

    Reply
    1. Astra Zeneca

      I just started working in a covid test lab. Been out of work for a while and needed the money and wanted to see what they are really doing.

      They do 45 cycles. The lab manager brags that they do more than anyone else so that they can detect the smallest amount of covid. Then at the same time admits that that many cycles will make a positive out of a flu virus or a cold.

      In addition they have to buy in test kits that provide the chemicals required for the pcr test. The test kits are packaged with various vials of test solution. Another company makes them. In the test kit is a negative and a positive. This gives the parameters for whether someone tests positive or not.

      The positive is a small vial of “covid”. Nobody in the lab knows what it really is but it is supposed to be an inactive rna strand of covid (many copies). That provides the positive against which everything else is tested.

      So just to recap, a test kit is bought in, it does 96 samples and in the kit is a sample of covid rna that has been supplied as a positive.

      The extraction and test takes about 4 hours and uses multiple chemicals and heat treatments.

      So I do the pcr tests for real and in my opinion they are 100% fake. The positive in the test kit to make the test solutions is a fake. 45 cycles magnifies a positive from any cold or flu virus anyway.

      It’s not only a case that there’s negative or positive but there’s a, “I’m not sure let’s do it again”.

      It is NOT black and white, it is NOT pass or fail. There is a baseline in the software that needs to be corrected each pcr plate. I’ll say that again, there is a lot of noise in the output and the baseline needs correcting, so positives and negatives are determined by how a lab tech deals with the data output by the pcr machine.

      In the U.K. they are £50 a go. We do 1000 a day, 7 days a week. Thats £50,000 a day or £350,000 a week. It’s big money, very profitable.

      And you know what, the lab techs running the tests sit around watching the computer screen, watching each iteration, looking for ones that are positive.

      “Well, they aren’t going on holiday”, followed by a few laughs is the general response to the data being output.

      Sickening.

      I’ll shine my light and fuck things up as much as I can before I get fired.

      Reply

Leave a Reply to Tiago Veloso Cancel reply