Channel: A.S.
My dear Earth friends,
I am happy that I can share a message with you once again.
Today I would like to discuss a trap that Earth people frequently fall into, and a trap that I have repeatedly fallen into.
The trap is assuming that anyone who disagrees with you, is automatically dumber than you are.
Or alternatively, that a person who disagrees with you is less informed than you are, or is less spiritually evolved than you are, or is morally inferior to you (they’re virtue-signalling, or racist, et cetera).
This is really convenient for the ego, because it lets it maintain the self image that you’re the smartest, or the most informed, or the most spiritually evolved, or the most morally upstanding person.
And you’re certainly better than that person who disagrees with you, who is clearly dumber or less informed or less evolved or less moral than you are.
Your ego really likes feeling superior to others, and it likes thinking that your current worldview is correct and indeed is superior to the worldview of others.
But the problem, of course, is that sometimes a person who disagrees with you actually isn’t dumber, or otherwise inferior to you.
In fact, it’s a common ego defense to label smarter or better-informed or more evolved people than yourself as actually being inferior to yourself.
However, doing so means that you learn a lot less things than you could be learning, and you miss opportunities to dispel illusions and misconceptions you might have. And most likely you have those.
One example of this phenomenon is: imagine a person on the other political side. Notice how you’re probably picturing someone who is likely inferior to you in some way. Even though there certainly are people on the other political side who are smarter than you, who are more well-read than you, who donate more money to charity than you, who spend more time doing volunteer work, et cetera.
That very thought, that some people on the other political side are superior to you in some way, may be vaguely uncomfortable to you.
Is that vaguely uncomfortable for you? I invite you to take a moment to feel your body.
That’s the crux: your ego is trying to meet your surface-level needs, and immediate psychological well-being is one of them. Hence people’s tendencies to assume that people who disagree with them are inferior to them.
Yes, this contributes to the resistance of sleepers to wake up.
But spiritual people do it too. A lot of spiritual people are implicitly assuming that people who disagree with them are just less spiritually evolved than them and therefore wrong. They don’t say that out loud, but that’s what a lot of spiritual people secretly think.
Or spiritual people might make self-serving rules that then “prove” that they’re superior to others. For example, a vegan might think that anyone who isn’t a vegan automatically isn’t as spiritually advanced as them. (I’m not saying all vegans think like this, I’m saying some do.)
Or a dedicated yoga practitioner might think that anyone who isn’t doing yoga or something similar automatically isn’t as spiritually advanced as them.
Or someone might think that anyone who meditates less or does fewer spiritual retreats automatically isn’t as spiritually advanced as them.
Or a person with a following might think that anyone who doesn’t have at least as big a following as they do, automatically isn’t as spiritually advanced as them.
Or a spiritual person might suppress and ignore everything that isn’t happy, and share only the most happy and most spiritual moments on social media, and act in a stereotypically spiritual way. And then that person might think that anyone who isn’t as good at performing spirituality as them automatically isn’t as spiritually evolved as they are.
Even though actual spiritual masters aren’t just someone who conforms really closely to the spiritual stereotype. Actual masters are typically non-standard in some way, or have some non-standard belief or beliefs.
So, how do we avoid this trap where people assume that everyone who has a different worldview than them, is inferior to them?
First of all, you are good enough already, even if someone else is smarter or more informed than you are. Smarter or better-informed or more spiritually advanced people than you existing doesn’t somehow make you “not good enough.”
In fact, the ability to open-mindedly listen to people with different perspectives, and to occasionally learn from people and change your mind, is a quality in and of itself. It’s only the ego that thinks that never changing your opinion is somehow strong or good.
If we’re talking about politics: don’t only look at the dumbest and most extreme people on the other side. Yes that is egoically pleasing, but there are smart, well-informed, reasonable people on the other side too.
Yes, almost certainly there are uninformed and morally reprehensible people on the other political side who have very dumb reasons for being on that political side. But that doesn’t mean that everyone on that political side is like that. Just because some people on the other political side are idiots or evil, doesn’t mean that they’re all like that.
Try to be fair. So don’t just blindly accept any argument that supports your worldview, even if it may be unreliable or poorly argued, while being extremely critical about any argument that doesn’t fit your worldview.
Similarly, don’t just blindly accept any argument that makes you feel good, even if it may be unreliable or poorly argued, while being extremely critical about any argument that makes you feel bad.
And acknowledge that people are different, and it’s not always the case that if only that other person was as smart or well-read or as spiritually advanced or as moral as you were, that they’d think exactly like you did.
People who disagree with you aren’t just a dumber clone of yourself.
Instead, different people are actually different. Other people might genuinely think in different ways. They’re not just exactly you, except dumber.
They’re not just exactly you, except less spiritually evolved.
A mistake I made back in my selfish days was that I thought that psychopathic, cold-blooded, self-interested logic was all there was, and the rest was all just weakness and nonsense.
From my perspective, I could out-logic and out-debate literally anyone.
I disregarded everything that wasn’t psychopathic logic as invalid, and then could win any discussion on my home turf. But of course, I was just looking through a very narrow lens.
I was just subjectively and even irrationally labeling the thing I like as being the one valid thing. But there was never any objective reason for why my thing actually was the only valid thing.
That’s a bit of an extreme example, but different people put different weights on things like rationality versus emotions, on being kind versus speaking the truth, on the importance of safety versus freedom, et cetera. Different people are different.
If you value a certain thing very highly, then it might be easy to think that of course you’re smarter and better informed than everyone else, because after all your worldview is the only one that sufficiently values that thing.
But this doesn’t indicate that other people are dumber than you. It may just mean that other people have different values than you. And their values aren’t automatically worse than your values.
Other people aren’t just dumber clones of yourself.
Also, I would like to talk about one more thing that frankly irritates me, R’Kok, perhaps more than it should.
Many people love Tunia’s messages, and are either fine with or actively enjoy that she occasionally talks about sex.
However, some readers, or listeners, have mentioned that Tunia talks excessively often about sex, after her message: “Tunia: What Pleiadians Are Like”.
Obviously you’re free to have that perspective, yet I would like to give my perspective as well.
I think that if you did a word count on all messages Tunia has ever put out (not just last week’s message), you’d be surprised how few words Tunia actually spends talking about sex.
In most messages she doesn’t mention sex at all. And in the others the sex talk either serves a larger purpose, or it’s just jokes or stories on the side. However sex isn’t the main point, nor is it most of the word count. It’s not like she’s writing the kama sutra here.
Although note that even in the much more pleasure-focused kama sutra, people have in their head that that book is just one sex position after the other. When in reality, the kama sutra isn’t predominantly about sex positions.
I guess that if a spiritual book or person talks about sex, especially a woman, that’s apparently so scandalous and sticks in the mind so clearly that people think that it’s all or mostly about sex. Even though it’s not.
Sex is an important part of life, so why would it be bad for sex to also be a part of her messages?
When Tunia jokes “After a century of being with him, I’m still working my husband’s penis like I’m a slave driver” then some people still remember that sentence almost two years later. But do people remember any other sentence from that seventeen-page message? Probably not.
[Channeler’s note: Tunia interrupts me to communicate that that sentence was not, in fact, a joke. Now, back to R’Kok.]
And then you can wonder if it’s the spiritual book or person that is weird about sex, or if it’s the average Earth person or Earth society that is weird about sex.
Who determines what is excessive sex talk, after all? It’s not like Tunia is hurting anyone, it’s not like sex or human bodies are bad, and it’s not like her being different from the norm is automatically bad.
So then, I say to those people who are a bit triggered by Tunia’s sex talk: as always it’s good to look inwards before you point the finger outwards.
Do you have “sex is shameful” or “bodies are bad” or “women aren’t allowed to be openly horny” or “women must be modest” programming?
Or maybe you’re in pain that most Pleiadians are having a great time while you’re down on Earth? Which would be a completely understandable feeling, but if that’s alive in you, then it’s good to be aware of that and to observe it.
Or is sexuality something you judge in yourself, or are you unhappy about your own sex life? Again, I empathize, but if so it would be good to observe it.
Personally, when I left my selfish days behind me and I left my fellow reptilians and joined the Pleiadians, I was very repressed and angry and ashamed and stuck in my head.
For me, it required a Pleiadian woman, who was just consistently and authentically herself, to eventually help me break out of my own shell and out of my own head and out of my own prison of mental constructs and illusions and nonsense.
I called her a bitch a few times, because she triggered me, but really she was just being herself and wasn’t hurting anyone. Well, she was hurting me, but then again she really wasn’t.
I’ve since apologized to her.
She was alive for me to apologize to her, but she chose to pass on before I was able to actually get over my own nonsense enough to realize that I appreciated her, that I cared for her, and that her authentic weirdness had inspired me and had taught me a great deal.
It is one of the regrets in my life that I wasn’t able to get over my own nonsense in time for me to be able to express to her that she actually meant a lot to me. That she was more to me than “well, you’re not a bitch. Sorry.”
Those were the last words of any substance that I ever said to her. I exchanged a few words with her a couple of times after that, but I didn’t say anything meaningful those times. Pathetic.
Maybe I’m projecting, but maybe Tunia, or some other Pleiadian woman, can be the authentic teacher who helps you get over some of your nonsense. Not by any particular technique of hers, but just by her being her own authentic weird self. And sometimes maybe by triggering the heck out of you.
Good. Get triggered.
Get triggered to hell and back.
Get triggered until your castle of nonsense collapses in on itself.
And I pray that when your castle of nonsense finally collapses, and you finally get over yourself, that woman will still be alive for you to be able to express to her just how much she means to you.
I’m projecting, I’m triggered, and I’m crying.
Uh, end of message.
** Source
** These messages are exclusively submitted to Eraoflight.com by the channeler. If you wish to share them elsewhere, please include a link back to the original post
If you want to meet like-minded Earth humans, please see https://eraoflight.com/2024/06/19/hakann-local-meetings-for-those-seeking-first-contact-with-benevolent-ets/
If you want to learn about a useful healing modality, please see https://eraoflight.com/2025/01/11/hakann-onion-healing/
Thank you R’kok, you lend a very, human aspect, to things, for which it seems, that all, of us, must get over, let go, and be at peace. I really do appreciate, the triumvirate, of you, Hakann, and Tunia. Sharing these things has a way, of uniting us together, and just being part, of that is a good, thing. I cannot wait, to meet all, of you, and be, in your company, for that reunion, in a sense, so long, in coming.
… for the record, that particular sentence from Tunia stuck with me because I the image of a ‘pile driver’ made much more sense than ‘slave driver’ in my head.
Not that I’ve had any previous reference about it, I just bring it up because sometimes precision is more important than depth –
(…) ok not helping myself right now, good day all.
Just sometimes.
Good night to you. Sorry, but you gave the rod and insisted that someone use it. I feel obliged. 😁
Thanks R’kok, I do like your messages which feel to me to be a bit more raw.
While much is said and observed about the myriad of ways they can become incredibly disfunctional, Egos are a necessary component in the development of the psyche (Soul). Through contrast and conflict, it develops and sustains a sense of Identity that would otherwise never retain shape and structure.
The disfunction you describe here happens when the Ego uses itself as a comparison model for something bigger than itself. It HAS to happen to a certain degree – as children learning anything new often do – but it eventually ‘hardens’ in areas that should be more flexible (similar to certain physical diseases) and hampers soul growth in the ‘diversity’ front.
The tricky part is that even my perspective here is limited by my current comprehension of what these words mean; so even if we exchange them very carefully, we are still basically relying on each other’s egos for translating all contact. It’s ultimately up to each one to ‘disarm’ their personal triggers, which as you suggested, is far more likely to happen once our identity and self-worth grows independent of it.
About the second part, some considerations:
– It seems as if you got a bit triggered “about people getting triggered”, which tends to resolve by simply realizing it. Fairly possible it was only part of making your point, but no harm in checking.
– The sex topic is taboo by artificial design, no word count or rational argument can change that. We are literally being FARMED into ignorance about the creative capacity of sexual energy so it can be harnessed by LESS creative beings who keep us trapped as generators of our own prison cells. Ingenious and evil indeed, but also a soul challenge to overcome.
Our disgust about this scenario is often made to project in ANYONE who tries to break us free from it, in a bizarre mix of rage, fear and baseless dogmatic ‘moralism’ towards others. You are probably more than well-aware of that, but I find it in order to have it verbalized at least as a mean to assume responsibility for my own interest in the subject.
[Tunia’s interruption was funnier that an actual joke, I think it’s about the group dynamic]
– Whoever this Pleiadian woman was, you are in the most unique position to pass on her compassion in the face of far worse rudeness and rejection from a whole lot more people in the times ahead; who will likely not be alive in time to thank you either. It’s stupid, but a comfort nonetheless, so cheers.
Thank you, R’Kok!
Some of the messages from this channeler with his “Pleiadians,” give me a feeling like they want to be our older brothers/sisters and are in continual Teaching Mode.
If and when we meet I don’t want to be their perpetual student. Sure I’m willing to pick up a few things but I’m looking for liberation not another guru. We are not your little pupils. Bear THAT in mind.
Yeah, amazing comment.
Pleiadians are different. But I do think you’re right that a not insignificant number of Pleiadians, including Pleiadians I channel, are too much in teaching mode.
And you’re completely right: the point of the galactic reunion isn’t that they’ll be the teachers and we’ll be the pupils.
They’ve seen your comment and they’ll reflect on it and perhaps have talks on their side about this.
The galactics I channel were already thinking that last week’s and this week’s more personal elements felt resonant and more interesting than channelings that were just pure spiritual teaching. So they were considering more casual / interpersonal / hanging out with peers or friends kinds of channelings (or at least having that be more of an element in the messages they send via me).
But I think you’re right that it goes deeper than that and it’s not just what channelings they send me, but also just their general attitude and outlook and approach towards us Earth humans. Which is of course more important.
So, great comment. Thanks.
As for my personal channelings: I currently have six written-out channelings in the upcoming messages queue (why six? Because there’s a four-parter among them, which nudged me to channel well ahead.)
Right now five of those six are still a bit “classically teaching style.” Perhaps the galactics can still add some personal elements to it, but for the next one and a half months, the messages will still be mostly in the old style.
After that, maybe we’ll have more casual / hanging out with friends type of channelings, although galactics I channel are currently busy discussing that and we don’t quite know yet.
The more personal messages make you Pleiadians also so much more relatable and thereby easier to connect with telepathically what is just wonderful. I don’t mind a good teaching when it helps to break free from certain matrix programmings, but “the etheric perfect E.T. beings” is also one of those programmings. What I would mind much more and disappoint me was finding out after galactic reunion that information has been omitted or altered in some way to make it “better digestable” (what I would identify as a “teacher’s syndrome”). So if for example there are also questionable sides of the Galactic Confederation which has been portrayed solely positive in this place so far, just give us the most accurate picture. We want and need truth in every aspect and deserve it.
Haha, I still remember, ages ago, when Tunia said she has a strong marriage, because she likes to keep Hakonn’s stomach full, and his balls empty 😂 gasp🫢
(I wasn’t offended, I thought it was funny and true. I know those around me, who’d still be offended, if they were open to reading “stuffy” woo woo spiritual messages) 🤭
Agreed, it’s taken a lot of discomfort (honesty) to reduce my arrogance and self validating programs.
I wonder how the mind runs those programs at the same exact time as low self esteem and low confidence?
Ick! No one answer that please, the answer is obvious; insanity😂
Cry, R’Kok, cry, they say it’s good for the soul… Many times, it’s the only action one has left.😌💎
Dear R’Kok, as a muslim woman in Indonesia… do you know how much I want to see the real world outside the Earth. Muslim women live like robot, get married with someone we don’t love, stay at home, have children. Well.. some women have better life but it’s all matrix 3D illusion. And I stay here wearing hijab, pray in the mosque but in my heart I visualize reunion with brothers and sisters from another planets or star systems. It feels so long…
Amy, I don’t know you, but I feel proud of you, keeping your true self, while conforming outwardly.
On the surface, my life couldn’t be more different. But I feel a kinship with your words, my controllers have been supervisors, coworkers and family, instead.
I do believe events are accelerating, and that we’ll be free.
I’ve made progress by having compassion for myself, I find it softens the personalities around me♥️💎
I think to the average Earth people, the sexual concepts of the Pleiadians are more advanced, more beyond nature, and unmanipulated, while the sexual concepts of the average Earth people are manipulated a lot on the basis of being more inclined towards nature, and due to the different social conditions, the natural tendency of genes even the definition of nature here is a little different from the Pleiadians’. Being more natural is not necessarily better, because ordinary genes are simple, delayed regulation aimed at as many successful reproductions as possible, which will make the relationship, including sex life, less ideal. For example, on Earth, the genes may have a slight tendency to ‘think’ that, male’s sleeping around or even rape is good, and female’s sex apathy or even sex shame is good, and then social culture may develop some programming for this, and these programming are distorted and manipulated by negative forces. On the other hand, technological humans are aware of the natural tendencies of genes, can make behavioral ‘parameter compensations’, use technological means to bypass some influence of genes, even modify their genes, and the Earth people have only recently acquired or restored a relatively high level of technological awareness.
Although it’s not a big problem, I feel there may be a little dissonance, and here is how I understand it: the average Earth people feels uncomfortable with both nature-based, non-manipulated sexual concepts, as well as nature-surpassed, more advanced sexual concepts. To some extent, some Pleiadians interpret certain nature-surpassed, more advanced sexual concepts as nature-based, non-manipulated sexual concepts, imply that if the Earth people are not manipulated, they will quickly accept these sexual concepts as normal, which causes some Earth people to feel additional discomfort, although they may hardly explain where is the dissonance clearly. Perhaps these three discomforts are confused to some extent by both sides, and if the distinction is made between which sexual concepts are natural, which sexual concepts are negatively manipulated, and which sexual concepts are more advanced optimizations, this dissonance can be eliminated.
Of course, personally I don’t think the sexual concepts of the Pleiadians are obviously advanced or radical, but at this stage I generally don’t talk about sexual concepts publicly, to avoid causing jump influence to other’s thoughts.
From all that I’ve heard here from Tunia, their ‘sexual concepts’ seem pretty much like ours as far as genes ‘think’ primitively, we are only more culturally prone to ‘romance’ things both in it’s positive and negative aspects. It just feels alien to us because it’s, well, literally seen through alien eyes.
But I’m not so keen on that perspective regarding our current notion of tech, I believe our most promising prospect for advance lies in “understanding co-creation of own genetics through conscious intent” instead. And after simple true healing, we may find that ‘improvements’ are not really desired at all.