Trudeau Moves Ahead on WEF’s Nitrogen Reduction Plan That Sparked Dutch Farmer Uprising

The Canadian government is moving ahead on the World Economic Forum-inspired plan to reduce nitrogen emissions from fertilizer use in the name of fighting climate change.

Following a meeting of federal and provincial officials on Friday, the Alberta and Saskatchewan Ministers of Agriculture expressed “profound disappointment” over Trudeau’s decision to attempt to reduce nitrogen emissions from fertilizer.

“We’re really concerned with this arbitrary goal,” Saskatchewan Minister of Agriculture David Marit said. “The Trudeau government has apparently moved on from their attack on the oil and gas industry and set their sights on Saskatchewan farmers.”

“This has been the most expensive crop anyone has put in, following a very difficult year on the prairies,” Alberta Minister of Agriculture Nate Horner said. “The world is looking for Canada to increase production and be a solution to global food shortages. The Federal government needs to display that they understand this. They owe it to our producers.”

Ontario’s Lisa Thompson said after the meeting, “Provinces were disappointed by the lack of flexibility and consultation regarding the federal target.”

However, some Canadian officials insist farmers will “embrace” the climate change policy.

From the Toronto Sun:

Federal minister Marie-Claude Bibeau called the government’s target ambitious but claims it’s one that farmers will embrace.

“I’m meeting with many farmers in the field. I know how much they care for the environment and how much they invest in new practices and new technologies to reduce their emissions as much as possible,” Bibeau said . “The idea is to produce the most sustainable food in the world.”

Farm groups, like the Western Canadian Wheat Growers , have said the federal plan will reduce crop output, reduce income for farm families and increase food prices in Canadian grocery stores.

The Canadian government is planning to implement a 30% reduction in nitrogen emissions by 2030, the same proposal as the Dutch government that has resulted in ongoing mass protests by Dutch farmers.

In response, the Canadian farmers are beginning to mobilize to support Dutch farmers and protest of Canada’s upcoming Great Reset scheme.

If the Dutch farmer protest is any indication, the mass resistance brewing in Canada should yield a similar show of defiance against the globalist-captured Canadian government.

**Source

7 Replies to “Trudeau Moves Ahead on WEF’s Nitrogen Reduction Plan That Sparked Dutch Farmer Uprising”

  1. MERLE HARTZLER

    When did Trudeau get his authority to act as a dictator. What law is he basing his babble on?

    Reply
  2. Val Hammer

    The REAL Trudeau has already been dealt with. What you are seeing is an actor, probably the third or fourth variant thereof. Canadians though, are still in a deep deep slumber.

    Reply
    1. Gustavo Frein

      So who is replacing him? White Hats? If he is a White Hat clone why does he carry out the dark agenda?

      What proof do you have of this allegation?

      Reply
  3. Gustavo Frein

    We can protest all we want. The only thing vile scum like Trudeau understand is a rope around their neck.

    Reply
    1. rht smythe

      GUSTAVO………….What proof do you have of this allegation that Trudeau only understands a rope around their necks?

      Surely..you are NOT claiming to be able to read minds, are you?!?!!?

      How is it that YOU would you know what they do or do not understand? That is a silly statement to CLAIM you know what other people do or do not understand… I laugh at it. Were you just talking out of your ass?

      Where did you get this knowledge of what they understand and dont???

      Can you post the entire List of everything they understand and the entire list of what they DONT know?

      DONT be so quick to call out PROOF from others when you do the same thing another poster was doing!

      Can you SEE your own hypocrisy?

      Reply
      1. Gustavo Frein

        This is so utterly ridiculous, sophomoric and lacking intelligence I really should not reply.

        No genius, I was not laying claim to have the ability to read minds. I was not speaking literally but metaphorically. People with a low IQ can’t often see the distinction.

        Essentially, metaphorically speaking, I was saying creatures like Trudeau who use force to impose tyranny on others will only be removed or made to stop by the imposition of force upon them.

        Now that I have laid it out for you in very simple terms, do you understand my point? Or did I use too many polysylabic words?

        Reply

Leave a Reply to Gustavo FreinCancel reply