The LA Times is one of the mouthpieces of the globalists that we like to refer to as the New World Order. And when this puppet newspaper writes about the potential dangers associated with the threat posed by major corporations, we should all sit up and take notice. Recently, the LA Times, through both overt and covert means revealed the dangers of the new 5G network to human health and safety.
Although the LA Times tip-toes around the issued of the extreme dangers associated with the new 5G network, these excerpts from the LA Times on the lethal dangers of this new network, clearly show the dangers:
Is 5G technology dangerous? Early data shows a slight increase of tumors in male rats exposed to cellphone radiation
“… wireless companies prepare to launch the next generation of service, there are new questions about the possible health risks from radiation emitted by cellphones and the transmitters that carry the signals…”
“…the launch of super-fast 5G technology over the next several years will dramatically increase the number of transmitters sending signals to cellphones and a host of new Internet-enabled devices, including smart appliances and autonomous vehicles. And the move to the new technology comes after unsettling findings from a long-awaited federal government study of the cancer risk from cellphone use.”
“National Toxicology Program researchers released preliminary data in May that showed small increases in tumors in male rats exposed to cellphone radiation…”(Editor’s Note: If you are the one who gets the cancerous tumors in your body, does that constitute a small risk?).
“The rats were exposed to nine hours of radiation daily, in 10-minutes-on, 10-minutes-off intervals, over their whole bodies for two years. The researchers found increased incidences of rare brain and heart tumors starting at about the federally allowable level of cellphone radiation for brain exposure, with greater incidences at about two and four times those levels.”(Editor’s Note: Under the 5G network installation plan, the human “rats” will be exposed, not for 9 hours, but we will all be exposed for 24/7/365. And if the effects are cumulative, as researchers like Virginia Farver believe to be true, the cancer risk rises exponentially. Even if we take the statistics at face value for the aforementioned study, why would anyone knowingly expose themselves to a variable that increases cancer risk by 200-400%?).
“…the American Cancer Society said marked “a paradigm shift in our understanding of radiation and cancer risk,” reignited debate about the potential harmful effects of cellphones on human health…”(Editor’s note: In a manner similar to how we inform the public about the inherent risk of cigarettes, which includes a warning label prominently displayed on the container housing the product, shouldn’t we require the same for something that increases our cancer risk by 200-400% and has captured the attention of the American Cancer Society? Has “informed consent” taken a backseat with regard to the cell phone industry and its army of congressional lobbyists?).
Last month, the U.S. became the first nation to allocate a large swath of airwaves for 5G. Those services could be available to consumers by 2020, offering transmission speeds at least 10 times faster than today’s 4G.
“The Federal Communications Commission voted unanimously to allow wireless providers access to high-frequency airwaves that have had limited uses because they can’t carry data very far.”(Editor’s note: Can’t carry data “VERY FAR”? What kind of pseudoscience and illogical reasoning is this with regard to justifying the use of a product with an unproven safety record? Please be mindful that the FCC granted their permission for this highly questionable process without looking at, or conducting, even one scientific study. The public safety be damned. Again, deferring to the research of Virginia Farver, as she states, “that the regulatory agencies that are supposed to protect the public from the excesses of this industry, are bought and paid for as are the city councils who are givengrants to encourage the sell-0ut of their citizens).
Technological advances have made it possible to expand consumer wireless services into those airwaves. But to use the spectrum, wireless companies will have to install thousands of small base stations — some just the size of smoke detectors — on utility poles and buildings to pass the signals along.(Editor’s Note: This LA Times reporter make this whole process sound so innocuous and harmless as he minimizes the threat be referring to the small size of the devices needed to pass along the signal. In a recent interview, I conducted with noted researcher, Virginia Farver, she stated that the city councils of Broomfield and Ft. Collins, Colorado, have approved the installation of these devices every quarter mile in densely populated areas. With this kind of market penetration, every citizen within these localities will be exposed to this radiation, that increases cancer risk by 200-400%, on a 24/7/365 basis. For these people and soon the rest of us, there will nowhere to run and nowhere to hide from this omnipresent danger).
“There were about 308,000 wireless antennas on cell towers and buildings at the end of last year, double the number there were in 2002, according to CTIA, a leading wireless trade group.”
“It’s unclear how many smaller base stations would be needed for 5G service. But it’s widely believed that there would need to be exponentially more because of the limited distance the signals can travel. One researcher estimated a station would be needed for every 12 homes in a dense urban area. (Editor’s Note: This is the Broomfield, CO., city council’s notion of community suicide, a 5G tower every quarter mile (12 homes in a densely populated neighborhood). There are other research considerations that are going unanswered. How does this technology impact pregnant women and their unborn babies? What impact will the 5G network have on the plasticity of young people’s developing brains? How does this impact the circadian rhythms of sleep?).
“There is a big concern with the previous technology and it’s just being made worse with 5G,” said Kevin Mottus, outreach director for the California Brain Tumor Assn., who attend the FCC meeting and unsuccessfully attempted to ask officials about the health effects.” (Editor’s Note: In Broomfield and Ft. Collins, public comment is not allowed).
“These are microwave transmitters and the closer you are to them, the more problems,” he said.
“Desiree Jaworski, executive director of the Center for Safer Wireless, a nonprofit organization that educates the public about the potential hazards of wireless radiation, said 5G signals will be harder for people to avoid.”
“Right now, you don’t have to live next to a cell tower. If you’re concerned about it, you can move away,” she said. “But once they have these cell antennas everywhere, you won’t be able to do that.”
Why Is This Dangerous Technology Being Forced Upon America?
In my radio interview with Virginia Farver, we explored this question. We both agree, that there are two components to underlying motivations associated with the use of such a dangerous product.
- This is corporate America, using governmental power which allows them to imperil public safety at the expense of corporate profits. The communications industry spends hundreds of millions in order to buy Congress and the White House. “Greed is good”.
- The other obvious reason for the employment of something so obviously dangerous and lethal speaks to the fact that this is a depopulation scheme.
I asked Farver which of the two beliefs she subscribed to. We both agree that both agendas are in play at the same time. Clearly, stockholders are going to be happy with each quarterly report because of the extreme market penetration. However, the real power behind the scenes, the Ted Turner’s, the David Rockefeller’s, and the George Soros’, will profit from humanity’s demise.
It would be necessary to manage the behaviors of the human lab rats if they were to have any thought of rebelling against their planned demise. Therefore, there is a third simultaneous agenda and that has to do with behavior modification. If one can manipulate behavior through electromagnetic signals, the population can be made to be docile and willing march towards their demise with uttering a word in protest.
I have previously written very detailed articles on the behavior modification techniques developed by such pioneers as Jose Delgado. Further, Nick Begich has covered these electronically controlled behavioral modification devices (i.e. voice to skull technology and Project HAARP). If one doubts the veracity of the claims made here in this article, I would strongly encourage reviewing the work of Delgado and Begich. And even a more detailed report on the technology can be found here.
I strongly encourage the reader to listen to my recent interview with Virginia Farver. This interview is chilling in its effect, but summarizes with more detail than is presented here.
The stark reality is this, if people, in overwhelming numbers do not speak up now, it will soon be too late to stop this assault upon humanity.